A year after federal transport authorities restricted fossil-fuelled vehicles to clear the market for electric vehicles (EVs), domestic insurers are discovering that the road to electrification runs through their balance sheets.
About 100,000 electric vehicles are estimated to be in circulation, less than five percent of the total fleet. Yet this small share has already forced an industry built around petrol cars to confront a harder equation that the premiums permitted under the existing rulebook do not easily match the repair bills landing on claims desks. Despite their marginal share of the fleet on the roads, EVs have already exposed a mismatch between their repair costs and the premiums insurers can charge.
The worry begins with the battery, the costliest part to replace.
According to Belay Tulu, insurance director at the National Bank of Ethiopia (NBE), the high cost of spare parts for EVs makes maintaining cover at the regulated minimum premium level unsustainable for insurers. The fix, he argued, is scale. Premiums fall as the pool of insured vehicles and policyholders grows, the basic principle of spreading risk. For premiums to ease, certain structural constraints should be addressed first, since rates naturally decline when the number of insured objects or persons is high.
The regulators at the NBE fixed minimum insurance rates below which no firm may price, a mandatory floor meant to protect policyholders by keeping insurers solvent and out of underpriced contracts. The rates are categorised by vehicle type (private or commercial) and engine capacity. They typically exclude profit; insurers build their own “motor charts” by adding operating costs and a margin on top.
Compulsory third-party rates, covering liabilities of up to 200,000 Br for property damage and bodily injury, are set separately by the Insurance Fund Office (IFO).
The regulator is also policing how insurers compete. According to Belay, the NBE does not permit price cartels, in which firms set uniform premiums for similar policies across the industry, thereby eliminating competition and turning the market against customers.
“It isn’t acceptable,” Belay told Fortune.
Insurers play down the alarm. According to Kiros Jirane, CEO of Africa Insurance, the first-generation firms, EVs do not introduce a fundamentally different category of physical risk. Electric and fuel-powered vehicles face similar accident conditions. The difference lies in repair costs and parts availability afterwards, above all batteries, which have limited lifespans and are hard to source for brands such as BYD.
“Reports that insurers have refused to cover EVs are ‘talk’ that does not reflect the industry,” he told Fortune.
According to Kiros, although insurers may set higher premiums for a new vehicle category with little claims history, the industry leans on the law of large numbers and internal loss ratios to adjust over time.
“No management-level decision has been made by major insurers to stop writing EV policies,” he said. “Firms continue to fulfil their obligation to restore damaged vehicles to their original condition by paying market value for the required parts.”
However, for those on the front line, such as Samson Bekele, head office branch manager at Zemen Insurance, the learning curve has been steep. Most insurers, his own included, first treated EVs as an unfamiliar category, then grew more comfortable as models such as BYD spread.
“The body structure resembles a petrol car,” he said, “but the battery system and overall functionality set EVs apart.”
Early on, no garages were equipped to service them, and insurers worried whether sealed battery units beneath the vehicles could be repaired after water damage or a crash. Those fears have eased, though parts remain costly, and electronic components such as lighting systems still carry high prices. Occasional difficulty sourcing parts can complicate claims.
As the fleet has grown, pricing has converged. According to Samson, initial premiums were higher, but the rising number of EVs has brought prices closer to those of conventional cars. High-end models such as Tesla, BMW and Audi are treated separately, while BYD parts have become more accessible and relatively affordable. Most insurers now apply the NBE minimum rates for familiar models, though Zemen Insurance uses specific underwriting guidelines for certain Chinese-manufactured vehicles.
The terms reveal where the risk sits. Batteries are handled separately under policy. In a total loss, customers contribute about 25pc to 30pc of battery costs through endorsements, while contributions for battery damage run 10pc to 15pc, depending on severity. Deductibles for accident claims fall between 10,000 Br and 15,000 Br, in line with other vehicles. Claims move faster when a local dealer is available, such as BYD through MOENCO. Without one, customers often source parts themselves.
Where the NBE mandated minimum rate for a vechile sits near 1.01pc, certain EVs reach two percent to 2.5pc depending on risk, though those rates are steadying as familiarity grows.
At Lucy Insurance, pricing matches conventional cars, with one twist. On a paid claim, the customer covers five percent more than standard, leaving conventional owners liable for up to 10pc and EV owners around 15pc.
The market absorbing these additions is itself expanding. As of June last year, the industry counted 22 companies, 14 composite firms, five general insurers and three re-insurers. Their total assets expanded to 78.26 billion Br from 66.84 billion Br a year earlier, and paid-up capital reached 15.85 billion Br, up from 11.69 billion Br. After-tax profit climbed to 7.44 billion Br from 5.77 billion Br, with investment income of 4.44 billion Br.
Motor cover dominates this business, and carries its heaviest losses. It generated gross premiums of 18.74 billion Br, 50.53pc of the industry’s total, up from 14.45 billion Br in 2024. Motor insurance accounted for a little more than half of the industry’s over 36 billion Br in total income. But it paid out 6.19 billion Br in claims, 54.02pc of the industry’s claims share. Even so, the motor insurance service result held at 9.88 billion Br for the year to June 2025, up from 6.26 billion Br.
For industry veterans, to help the industry absorb EVs without distortion, pricing may need to change.
According to Fikru Tsegaye, vice-president of the Society of Insurance Professionals (SIP) and a senior executive at Ethiopian Re-insurance, exceptionally high spare-part costs, driven by import dependency and foreign-currency shortages, have made minimum premiums hard to sustain, for those rates were designed for internal-combustion vehicles. He urged a shift to risk-based pricing that builds in battery value and claims history.
Batteries in EVs account for up to 50pc of a vehicle’s value.
“Policies should define coverage clearly and set fair cost-sharing, including depreciation by battery life,” Fikru told Fortune.
Experts in the industry observed that scarce specialised garages and components often force total-loss declarations even when repair is possible, calling for cooperation among insurers, importers and policymakers to build local repair capacity. The absence of historical risk data for new brands has led to inconsistent premiums, which could be addressed by a centralised industry database.
“Parallel imports without official dealer support add cost and complexity to claims,” Fikru said, urging minimum after-sales requirements for EV importers. “Coordinated action among regulators, insurers and repair providers is essential to build EV-specific underwriting and keep the sector stable as the fleet grows.”
Until that framework arrives, insurers are pricing a fast-growing fleet on scarce and patchy data, one battery claim at a time.
Loading your updates...