FORTUNE+ VIDEO SPONSORED CONTENTS ADVERTORIALS FORTUNE AUDIO Fortune Careers TRADE AFRICA Election 2026 New TIME REMAINING UNTIL ETHIOPIA’S NATIONAL ELECTION 0Days 0Hours 0Minutes 0Seconds

Addis Abeba’s Conscience Should Lay Beyond the Skylines

Addis Abeba has been drawing fresh attention as it changes. Visitors now arrive from across the world, from streamers and athletes to cultural travellers, curious about what the city has become. The rising skyline, the spread of cafés and cultural hubs, and the energy of young professionals have made the diplomatic capital of Africa feel more visible in new ways.

Yet not every visitor comes looking for glamorous lifestyles, posh hotels or polished restaurants. Some arrive with a different kind of curiosity. They want to understand the community, those places rarely dominate postcards or online posts. Yet, they say as much about the city as its towers, traffic and newly fashionable corners now do.

That impulse shaped an encounter last week, when a group of South Koreans came to Addis Abeba. Instead of asking to be taken to one of the city’s top restaurants or tourist attractions, they asked to visit a local orphanage. One of my friends, who served as their translator, suggested the Muday Charity Association (MCA) after visiting it recently herself.

The Charity, one of over 100 across the country supporting more than 21,000 children, was founded by Muday Mitiku in the Kotebe neighbourhood, north of Addis Abeba, in 1999. It began as a school, but Muday saw more students from low-income families struggling without stable family support or necessities. She gradually turned the space into an orphanage, a practical response to what she was seeing. Over time, the organisation expanded to provide food, health services, education and shelter to children and women in need.

Today, about 700 children live there, all under the age of 15. The scale is hard to grasp until visitors stand inside the compound and watch the routines that sustain so many young lives every day. My friend had long heard of the organisation, but had not visited it until recently. That detail stayed with me. And it led to a question that has lingered since.

How often do we visit our local charities ourselves? If tourists asked us to take them to a charity organisation, would we choose a place we had actually visited and understood the work being done? Or would we point to an organisation known only through promotion, word of mouth or social media posts?

These may appear to be simple questions, but they cut deeper than it first seems. They reveal something about how closely we know our own communities, and how often we engage with institutions that work quietly inside them.

Many dreams can seem distant, not because they are impossible, but because people do not know how to move toward them. The accuracy of information, the right people, and the timing often determine whether an ambition feels real or remote. Sometimes what stands between a person and a dream is not ability or willingness, but exposure.

One of my long-standing dreams has been adoption. For years, the only path I could imagine was volunteering at orphanages. Playing with children, taking whatever we had collected through fundraising activities, and spending time with them felt like the nearest step toward something larger. As someone serving in an international youth volunteering service organisation, I have long found community service visits among the most meaningful activities in my life.

Our visits to Muday became some of the most memorable. Part of that was the scale of its work. Over the years, Muday has grown into one of the best-known child-support organisations in Addis Abeba. Its work has been sustained by community partnerships, volunteers, donors, and sponsorship programs that connect children with people who want to support them in meaningful ways.

Recently, after many years in its earlier location, the organisation reached a milestone. The government allocated land for a new facility, and Muday has since built a new space designed to serve better the children who depend on it. The move marks physical growth, but also recognition of the organisation’s long contribution to the community.

During one of our visits, we learned about a sponsorship program that changed how I understood my own dream of adoption. Many people assume that supporting a child means bringing that child into one’s home. Muday offers another path. Through its program, a person can sponsor a child and take part in that child’s life journey while the organisation continues to provide structured care and supervision. The arrangement is also strikingly accessible.

Starting from a contribution of 20 Br a day, or 600 Br a month, which amounts to 7,200 Br a year, someone can become a supporting parent figure in a child’s life. In today’s economy, that may seem like a small sum. But the effect is not small. It offers children something more personal than a general donation. It gives them the sense that someone, somewhere, is rooting for them as an individual. More than financial support, sponsorship is also a form of emotional recognition. It tells a child that she is seen, remembered, and supported beyond the walls of the institution where he lives. It creates a bridge between members of the wider community and children whose futures depend on a shared sense of responsibility.

Learning about the program changed everything. The experience reshaped how I think about responsibility, connection and what it means to take part in someone else’s future. It did not require waiting for a perfect moment or some distant opportunity. It required awareness, willingness and action. I became a mother to an eight-year-old girl.

When visitors come to Addis Abeba and ask to see the community beyond restaurants and hotels, they force a useful shift in perspective. They remind us that the city is defined not only by development projects, entertainment spaces or its growing visibility, but also by institutions that quietly support children, families and vulnerable communities every day.

They also remind us that some of the most important stories are the ones closest to home. The question, perhaps, is not only how often we visit such places, but how often we allow ourselves to imagine being part of them. Supporting an organisation like Muday does not demand extraordinary resources. Sometimes it starts with a visit; at times with a conversation; and often with the simple decision to believe that even a small act can help move someone else closer to a future.

In the end, the lesson these visitors bring may not be what they discover about Addis Abeba. It may be what they help us rediscover about ourselves.

Africa’s Geopolitical Hand Stronger than Ever

The shift from fossil fuels to low-carbon, climate-resilient economies, intertwined with the digital transformation, is not merely an environmental imperative but the organising principle of the next world order. It will inevitably produce winners and losers, and history offers no guarantee that justice will determine which is which.

At the centre of this upheaval lies the global energy transition.

Fortunately, Africa is not without power or agency. Two recent African climate summits, in Nairobi in 2023 and Addis Abeba in 2025, signalled that the continent intends to position itself as a notable contributor to global solutions, not a perpetual supplicant or the epitome of a continent mired in dependent development. This framing may matter, but framing without strategy is mere rhetoric.

The question now is whether Africa, notwithstanding its intent and positioning, can turn its moral high ground and its extraordinary endowments, such as massive renewable-energy potential, large reserves of critical minerals, and a young, growing labour force, into durable geopolitical and economic leverage.

The African Union’s (AU) 2023 induction into the G20 as a permanent member offers the continent a strategic opening that it still needs to capitalise on. The G20 has proven its capacity to shape the multilateral agenda. Language from its communiqués calling for a tripling of renewables commitments, a phase-down of fossil-fuel subsidies, and reforms to the financial architecture has consistently migrated to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) process.

By its very nature, the G20 represents the centre of the global economy, not the periphery.

But lest we forget, the 2002 Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development went further in embedding African priorities into the global policy agenda. Among its most important elements were commitments to electrify the continent (now enshrined in Mission 300, which seeks to connect 300 million people to electricity by 2030), to promote clean cooking, and critically, to address illicit financial flows. Over two decades later, illicit flows, driven largely by extractive industries, drain an estimated 88 billion dollars annually from African economies, a problem that will only intensify as the world scrambles for the minerals that underpin the green transition.

This scramble is positioning Africa at the core of a reconstituted global economy, one that is not driven solely by demand for fossil fuels and a shifting governance architecture that supplants the colonial-type matrices of asymmetrical power relations. Thus, for the first time in the continent’s post-colonial history, it can leverage strategic leadership and the weight of a broader historical transformation to exert control over its own resources and developmental priorities.

Seizing this opportunity calls for a two-pronged strategy. Africa should use multilateralism as a shield, insisting on rules, norms, and principles of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities to protect smaller powers in an anarchic world. At the same time, Africa should use minilateral engagements as a sword, advancing concrete development goals where the rules are still being written.

Within the G20 context, the African Union Commission should pursue integrative opportunities for regional and sub-regional economic development. For example, greater investment is needed to link regional industrialisation in the ARISE Integrated Industrial Platforms and regional transport corridors with the energy-minerals nexus of Africa’s Green Minerals Strategy, the Continental Power System Masterplan, and the African Single Electricity Market.

The G20, and potentially the BRICS+ groupings, offer the type of platform Africa needs at this point in the continent’s socio-economic development trajectory. An African Union presence in BRICS+, even as an observer, would diversify the continent’s global engagement and open channels for infrastructure and climate finance that do not run exclusively through Western-dominated institutions. A technical team drawing on the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) Secretariat, Afreximbank, the African Development Bank (AfDB), the African Group of Negotiators, and the UN Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA) would give such engagement real substance.

The moral dimension of this strategy should not be underestimated. The G20 has been conspicuously reluctant to engage seriously on climate adaptation and loss and damage (compensation for irreversible climate-driven harms), because doing so would implicate its members in questions of historical responsibility that they prefer to avoid. For that reason, the G20 is precisely where African political capital should be concentrated. By holding the moral high ground on climate justice, Africa gains leverage not only in the UNFCCC process but also in broader discussions over priorities for 21st-century global development.

Strategic opportunity is not destiny. But the confluence of a fracturing world order, the energy transition, and Africa’s demographic and resource endowments creates conditions that have not existed before. The continent’s leaders, its negotiators, and its institutions have the tools to usher in a new paradigm. But they should use them strategically and in concert. The move from gladius to spatha said a lot about the evolving nature of power in Roman times. The situation today is no different.

The choice of instrument, and who wields it, will define the coming era.

Data Wealth Trapped in Public Sector Silos

Data is everywhere in the public sector, yet nowhere near as useful as it should be. From biometric registrations to tax filings, from school records to utility payments, public institutions are gathering information. Officials and policymakers increasingly repeat a familiar slogan that “data is the new oil.” But this assertion obscures a harder, unsettled question.

When, exactly, does data become a resource?

The answer lies less in how much data is collected than in how it is used. Data becomes a genuine economic and governance resource only when it moves beyond its first purpose, when a dataset can serve several functions across systems, institutions and decisions. Today, much of Ethiopia’s data ecosystem remains stuck in a linear model. It is collected, used once for a specific administrative task, and then left in a silo.

For instance, the pattern is clear in biometric data collection. Several institutions, including the national ID initiative, Fayda, the immigration office, civil registration systems, the Ministry of Labour & Skills, and city administrations such as Addis Abeba, have independently collected overlapping datasets. Each system is built around its own mandate, with little interoperability. The result is redundancy, inefficiency and lost opportunity. Instead of becoming a reusable national asset, data is divided into institutional islands.

The problem reaches beyond biometrics when we examine the education systems, which hold records on students. Health institutions maintain patient information, while tax authorities collect financial and compliance data, and utilities monitor consumption patterns. Each dataset has value on its own. But its greater value lies in connection, not in being locked up in a silo. Linking education and labour data could guide workforce planning, and combining utility and tax data could sharpen economic forecasting. Integrating health and demographic data could strengthen public health interventions.

Yet such use across sectors remains the exception, not the rule, due in large part to a failure of design as much as technology.

Ethiopia’s data architecture is still shaped largely by institutional mandates rather than national strategy. Each agency builds around its own needs, often starting from scratch, repeating data collection efforts, and paying too little attention to interoperability standards. In doing so, the country bears not only direct financial costs, but also opportunity costs, the lost value of data that could have been used again.

In theory, data has the qualities of a non-rivalrous good. Use by one institution does not reduce its availability to another. That is what separates it from traditional resources such as land or minerals. But unlike natural resources, data does not become useful through extraction alone. Its reusability has to be designed. Without rules for sharing, standards for compatibility, and systems for governance, data remains underused.

Moving from data as a byproduct to data as a resource requires a shift in policy and mindset. Interoperability has to become a national priority, with common data standards, unique identifiers and secure protocols for data exchange. If used well, the Fayda ID system could serve as a layer that links different datasets without repeated collection.

Data governance should also balance access with privacy and security. The rise of data protection and privacy regulations offers a solid base for responsible use. These rules should not be viewed as obstacles but treated as enablers, helping build trust among citizens and institutions and creating the conditions for safe data sharing. Trust is the currency of any functioning data ecosystem.

Nor does Ethiopia need to wait for artificial intelligence (AI) before treating data as a resource. Even analytical tools can create value. Basic matching, trend analysis and cross-referencing can produce insights that improve service delivery and policy choices. Identifying overlaps between social protection beneficiaries and tax records could improve targeting efficiency. Far more than futuristic ideas, these are practical steps within immediate reach.

However, the path ahead cannot be without its limitations. Institutional inertia, disputes over data ownership, and limited technical capacity can all slow progress. There is also a risk of over-centralisation, in which data integration concentrates power without enough safeguards. A federated data architecture may offer a better balance, allowing institutions to retain control over their own data while following shared standards.

Other options deserve attention, too. Public-private partnerships could help build data infrastructure and strengthen analytics capacity. Incentives for data sharing, whether through performance metrics or budget allocations, could push institutions beyond siloed operations. Building skills, especially in data engineering and governance, remains equally important.

For Ethiopia to use data as a national resource, it has to move from accumulation to utilisation, from fragmentation to integration, and from isolated systems to a connected data ecosystem. As digital transformation shapes economic competitiveness and the quality of governance, the value of data lies not in its collection but in its connections.

Africa Needs to Turn Climate Targets into Green Strategies

Africa’s immense renewable-energy potential and fast-growing population offer the continent a rare opportunity to pursue economic strategies that can deliver resilient and sustainable growth. Climate action is a tremendous development opportunity for Africa, as well as an environmental necessity.

Many African governments have already assumed a leadership role on this front. So far, 47 African countries have submitted the second round of nationally determined contributions (NDC), the decarbonisation plans required under the 2015 Paris climate agreement, while 23 have submitted the third round. Their contributions have become increasingly ambitious, with higher emissions-reduction targets, and their adaptation planning has improved.

The direction of travel is clear. Africa is laying the foundations for an era of green development. Investment flows have begun to reflect this rising climate ambition, with the continent receiving around 15 billion dollars in renewable energy financing in 2023, more than double the previous year. But a persistent financing gap remains. In recent years, Africa has received only 11pc of the 277 billion dollars required annually to implement the national contributions and meet its 2030 climate goals.

One of the main problems is that planning has outpaced the creation of a pipeline of concrete investment opportunities, a challenge not unique to Africa. For most countries, the hardest part of the green transition is not setting targets or building frameworks, but ensuring there are enough climate-mitigation projects into which investors can deploy capital.

Many national policymakers take a “wish list” approach to their national contributions, without thinking about investment potential or how they contribute to economic transformation. Governments undermine their credibility when they shop a long list of decarbonisation ideas that do not translate into bankable projects. And when NDCs are misaligned with the broader economic-growth agenda, they are likely to cause intragovernmental disputes that stall progress. Investors often echo these concerns, describing national contributions as extensive lists of aspirations that lack clarity on prioritisation and implementation.

In many cases, climate investments are capital-intensive, policy-dependent, and slow to mature. When countries fail to substantiate their commitments for national contributions with investable strategies and connect them to policy reforms, fiscal allocations, and regulatory signals, assessing risk and return becomes more difficult. This reduces the likelihood of mobilising capital, whether commercial, philanthropic, or concessional, particularly amid tightening global financial conditions.

Fortunately, African countries can close this gap by adopting a practical and results-focused approach to translating NDCs into concrete, actionable plans that deliver climate resilience and economic prosperity. That means explicitly anchoring opportunities in national development and sectoral priorities. Instead of focusing on isolated projects that serve only a single climate objective, policymakers should promote those that contribute to the development of durable capabilities, value chains, institutional capacity, or key infrastructure. It also means encouraging private investment alongside public or concessional funds.

Some opportunities are already commercially attractive. Others may require blended finance, targeted policy reforms, or stronger enabling environments. And still others may have no medium-term pathway to economic viability and require philanthropic funding. Distinguishing between these categories and matching the right type of capital to the right opportunity requires a structured, iterative approach.

That is why the African Climate Foundation (ACF), together with Dalberg Advisors, developed the NDC Investment Planner, a framework that helps governments assess the impact of mitigation and adaptation solutions, enabling a better understanding of their contributions to NDCs. The Planner facilitates the systematic evaluation of these opportunities in terms of their investment potential and their alignment with broader economic goals. This helps countries identify high-priority areas for commercial financing, which can improve project preparation, and those that require policy alignment or concessional support.

The National Planner is a platform for creating pipelines of investment-ready climate projects that can attract public, concessional, and private capital. The goal is to enable policymakers to strengthen coordination across government ministries and focus on opportunities that can be packaged into credible portfolios, accelerating the green transition. With this framework, partners and development finance institutions can better align technical assistance and funding, while the private sector can engage earlier, with clearer entry points and greater confidence in proposed projects.

From mini-grids and off-grid solar to improved agricultural inputs and green manufacturing, Africa’s climate transition has the potential to drive economic growth while strengthening resilience. But to realise this ambition, the continent should reimagine climate leadership. The challenge is not setting targets but translating them into strategies that attract the investment needed to deliver real results.

Civil Society Should Break Addiction to Foreign Aid

Civil society organisations (CSOs) cannot keep building their future on money that mostly comes from foreign funders, because the model has always been fragile. It is even more so when official development assistance dropped sharply, while the shutdown of USAID and the suspension of many American-funded programs, especially those in Ethiopia’s CSO sector, hit hard.

This is why resource mobilisation from local sources is no longer simply a good idea but a necessity. Foreign support may still matter for some time. But domestic CSOs need a stronger home base if they want to withstand funding shocks and continue serving the public.

Even the regulator, the Authority for Civil Society Organisations (ACSO), now speaks more openly about the need for local resource mobilisation and corporate social responsibility. More recently, it also announced the establishment of a Local Resource Mobilisation Taskforce, working with Siiqqee Women’s Development Association (SWDA). In 2019, the law governing the conduct of civil society organisations opened an important door, allowing CSOs to raise income through lawful business and investment activities.

That was a welcome step, for it recognised a simple truth that a sector that depends too much on donors will always remain exposed. But allowing income to be generated on paper is not enough. The harder question is whether the wider policy environment is helping CSOs make real use of that opening. The answer, so far, is not enough.

One clear lesson is already evident at home. Mekedonia Humanitarian Association (MHA) has shown that Ethiopians are willing to give to a secular institution when they can see the work, trust the organisation and feel connected to the cause. Its fundraising success carries two important messages. One is that the culture of giving remains, and public trust does not come out of nowhere. It grows from visible work and visible impact. The more CSOs do work that people can see and value, the easier it becomes to mobilise support.

But Mekedonia’s model should not be copied without care. Copy-and-paste ways of resource mobilisation from the public on its own are not a strong long-term answer. If an organisation keeps collecting money, spends it all, and then returns to the public again and again, donor fatigue will eventually follow. Public fundraising can be a starting point. It should not be the whole strategy. Part of the money raised should be used to build assets or activities that can generate income later.

That is where income-generating activities matter, and CSOs should start with what they already have. They should ask which part of their work, skill, service, or asset can lawfully generate income without losing sight of the mission. They should also learn from local organisations that are often seen as relatively stronger in this area, such as Marie Stopes Ethiopia, Mary Joy Ethiopia and Abebech Gobena Charity Association. Not every CSO can do the same thing, but they do not need to start from zero either.

At the same time, many CSOs will find it hard to build income-generating activities on their own. Initial capital is one problem. Business know-how is another. Weak coordination inside the sector is also part of the problem. Too often, organisations compete over very limited resources as if one group’s gain is another group’s loss, a mindset that has to change. Where one CSO cannot do much alone, several CSOs may be able to do something together. They can pool money, staff, ideas, and assets, and joint efforts may be more realistic than isolated efforts.

This is also where public institutions should step in more seriously. The Authority and the Ethiopian Civil Society Organisations Council (ECSOC) should not limit themselves to general encouragement. They should actively support the shift toward local funding. That means training, capacity-building, practical guidance, and forums where CSOs can learn from one another’s experiences. It also means helping the sector think beyond short-term fundraising toward long-term sustainability.

The private sector matters too. Much more can be done on corporate social responsibility. Government influence still carries weight in shaping how the private sector sees public issues. Clear public encouragement from the government can help businesses see support for credible CSOs as part of their social responsibility rather than something to avoid.

Another issue, the stigma against advocacy CSOs, needs honest attention and needs to be challenged. Public support should not be reserved only for organisations that provide direct services. Groups working on rights, accountability, law reform and public debate also serve the public good. People should be able to support such organisations without fear, as a healthy civil society needs both service organisations and advocacy organisations.

Then there is the tax problem, which is notorious for sending mixed signals. On the one hand, the CSO law enables business and investment activities, allowing organisations to build a stronger local funding base. On the other hand, income from those activities is taxed in the same way as income earned by ordinary for-profit businesses. That creates a real contradiction. CSOs are told to become more self-reliant, but when they try, the tax system treats their efforts as if there were no public interest behind them.

This matters because taxes can shape behaviour. If the income from a CSO’s lawful business activity is fully taxed like ordinary commercial profit, some organisations may decide that the effort is not worth the burden. That would hurt the very move toward local resource mobilisation that the law was supposed to support. However, this does not mean every business activity by a CSO should be tax-free. It does mean the law should be more careful and more sensible.

Tax relief, where given, should be tied to clear public-benefit conditions, proper accounting, and ongoing compliance. The aim should be to support genuine mission-linked income, not to create a back door for misuse.

Government support can also be practical, offering shared workspaces, common facilities, and other basic services that make a real difference. Many CSOs spend too much of their limited income on rent and overheads. Money saved there could instead help build sustainable, income-generating efforts.

The larger point is simple. Local resource mobilisation should not be about asking for money. It is about trust, visibility, planning, law, tax and collaboration. CSOs need to become more visible to the public. They need serious resource mobilisation strategies. They need staff who focus on this work. They need to learn from stronger examples. And they need to work together more.

The old funding model is becoming less secure. The local CSOs can either wait and grow weaker each year or slowly build a stronger base at home. That path will not be easy, but it is the most realistic one. In the long run, a stronger civil society will be one that is funded more closely by the people it claims to serve.

Some Illnesses Whisper Until We Miss the Signs

I ran into an acquaintance recently. She shared news that should have been simple to celebrate. She said she was pregnant. I congratulated her right away, caught in the moment. She smiled, but only briefly.

Then her tone shifted. What followed was not just a happy announcement. It became a story about how close things came to a very different outcome.

Before the pregnancy, she had been struggling for a long time. She described a kind of exhaustion that never lifted. No matter how much she slept, she woke up drained. She was sleeping more than usual, yet it did not help. Her energy was gone. She felt irritable in a way that was new to her. She was gaining weight even though nothing in her routine had changed.

She sensed something was wrong. She told her husband and family that she needed to see a doctor. They reassured her she was fine. The advice leaned toward sleep habits needing adjustment. At times, it sounded like she was overthinking it. Her irritability slowly became something to correct rather than a signal to understand.

Nearly a year passed before her husband finally agreed to take her to a hospital. By then, she had grown used to carrying the discomfort in silence. When she was finally examined, the answer came quickly. She had hypothyroidism, a condition where the thyroid gland does not produce enough hormones. One condition explained everything she had been living through. The fatigue. The weight gain. The mood changes. Even the difficulty in becoming pregnant.

Once treatment began, things started to change. Medication replaced the missing hormone. Her energy returned. The long oversleeping stopped. Her mood steadied. The weight linked to fluid retention reduced. Slowly, she began to feel like herself again. Then she became pregnant.

As she spoke, she mentioned that her husband still carries a sense of shock and guilt. He reflects on how long it took to act. On the moments he did not listen when she said something was wrong. Her story has a good ending, yet that is not always the case.

I know families whose experiences still sit heavily in memory. In those situations, delayed care led to outcomes that cannot be reversed. What remains are unanswered questions. What if attention had come sooner? What if the warning signs were taken seriously? What if waiting had not stretched so long?

Doctors see this pattern more often than many realise. My physician friend once told me that one of the hardest parts of his work is not only disease complexity, but timing.

“Some of the people we lost didn’t have to die,” he said. “They came too late.”

A common thread runs through these experiences. Many people wait for visible signs before believing something is wrong. They respond to what can be clearly seen. Bleeding. Severe pain. Something unmistakable.

Many conditions do not begin that way. They start quietly. A shift in energy. A change in appetite. Mood changes. A persistent feeling that something is off. These signs are easy to dismiss because they do not look urgent.

Sometimes the dismissal happens within ourselves. Other times, it happens in families. Words like “you are fine” get spoken without full understanding. Reassurance without real attention can slow down the search for help that might change everything.

There is also a deeper layer to this. People tend to trust what they can see more than what they are told. If someone appears fine, the assumption follows that they are fine. Yet the person living inside that experience is carrying something invisible from the outside. Listening to that reality matters.

This does not mean every symptom signals something severe. It means persistent and unexplained changes deserve attention. It means seeking medical advice rather than relying on assumptions.

There are practical reasons people delay care. Some avoid hospitals altogether. Others fear the cost. Some fear what they might discover. Many simply dislike the environment, where stress and illness feel close at hand.

That hesitation is understandable. Still, it can carry consequences. Hospitals are where answers begin. They are where symptoms are properly assessed, where tests clarify what is happening, and where treatment can start early, when it is often more effective.

Waiting can shift a manageable condition into something more serious. The challenge is not to panic at every change, but not to ignore patterns either. When something repeatedly feels wrong, it deserves attention.

There is also a social dimension. In many homes, decisions about seeking care are not made alone. A partner or family member often shapes the response. When someone says they feel unwell, the reaction they receive influences what happens next. If they are taken seriously, they are more likely to seek help. If they are dismissed, delay becomes more likely.

The acquaintance I met that day reminded me how thin the line can be between a stable outcome and a tragic one. Her brief smile carried both relief and memory. Relief that she received care in time. Memory of how long the path to that care took.

The lesson is simple. When something feels off, it should not be brushed aside. It should be noticed. It should be taken seriously, even when the signs are not obvious. Seeking help early can feel unnecessary in the moment, but waiting can cost far more. In the end, the decision to act or delay shapes everything that follows.

Turns Out, Talking Pays Better

The search for a side hustle has become less of a choice and more of a necessity. It often begins with simple optimism, scrolling through opportunities, asking around, hoping for something that fits. More often than not, the search circles back to the same place: mismatched skills and unavailable roles. So when a colleague recently recommended me for a public speaking opportunity, the reaction was not purely excitement. It was also a quiet, uncomfortable awareness that I was stepping into unfamiliar territory.

On paper, the role looked simple: stand in front of an audience and present. In reality, it carried a weight that forced immediate self-doubt. I am the kind of person who only commits when I feel fully prepared, and here I was, questioning whether I had any real foundation for this kind of work. School presentations suddenly felt irrelevant. My mind did what it always does under pressure, it leaned toward failure before effort even began.

The only way forward was preparation. I rehearsed scripts, adjusted delivery, and tried to build confidence through repetition. It was not natural certainty; it was constructed discipline. There is a thin line between pretending to be ready and slowly becoming ready. I stayed on that line, unsure which side I was actually on.

Then came the question that changed everything: “name your price.” It sounded simple, but it wasn’t. I froze. I had a number in mind, but no reference for whether it was too high or too low. I asked for time and immediately reached out to people already working in similar spaces.

What I learned shifted the entire situation. Public speaking and event hosting, in this context, are paid on a scale far beyond what I expected. Entry-level presenters earn around 50,000 Br per engagement, while experienced professionals can reach 200,000 Br for a single event. The range depends on audience size, brand profile, and experience, but even the baseline is significant.

That information changed my hesitation into urgency. The idea that a few hours of work could equal months of regular income reframed everything. I set my price, made the call, and waited. But the number stayed in my head long after the conversation ended.

It raised a broader question about how work is valued. Across cities and offices, the average employee wakes early, travels long distances, and works full days under constant pressure. This routine repeats five or six days a week. Despite that effort, many earn less than a fraction of what a single speaking engagement can pay. The imbalance is difficult to ignore.

This is not a rejection of high-paying roles. Specialised skills, especially those tied to communication and influence, clearly have market value. But the gap becomes harder to justify when compared to professions built on long-term training and responsibility. Healthcare is the clearest example. Doctors and nurses spend years studying and working under intense pressure, often in life-or-death environments, yet their compensation frequently falls behind roles driven by presentation and persuasion.

The issue is not that speakers earn well. It is that the market often rewards visibility more than depth. Someone who can command attention in a room may earn more in an hour than someone who spends years developing life-saving expertise. That imbalance reflects how influence is priced over impact.

At the same time, this dynamic is happening in an economy where everyday costs are rising sharply. A simple grocery run shows it clearly. Cooking oil has reached 470 Br per litre. Basic items that were once insignificant, like chewing gum, now cost multiple times more than before. Inflation is no longer a statistic; it is a daily negotiation at the checkout counter.

Yet salaries in many sectors have not adjusted at the same pace. Entry-level income often struggles to cover basic living costs. Rent, transport, and food consume most of it before anything else is considered. In that reality, the idea of a “living wage” becomes less theoretical and more urgent.

Within this gap, opportunities like high-paying freelance work begin to look less like bonuses and more like escape routes. But access to them is uneven. Not everyone can enter these spaces, even if they are capable. Networks, timing, and exposure play a major role. That creates another layer of inequality, between those who can access high-value gigs and those who remain in standard employment cycles.

My own experience sits somewhere in between. It is a personal win, but also a reminder that opportunity is often conditional. The same system that rewards confidence and visibility can also exclude those without access to it. That tension stays in the background even when individual success is achieved.

What becomes clear is that this is not just about one opportunity. It is about how value is distributed across different kinds of work. Some roles are amplified because they are visible. Others are essential but underpaid because they are routine. Both are necessary, but they are not treated equally.

In the end, the question is not whether high-paying speaking roles should exist. They should. The question is what it says about a system where persuasion can outweigh production, and presence can outweigh expertise. When a few hours on stage can equal months of structured work, something in the balance is off.

The economy is changing quickly, and inflation keeps tightening pressure on everyday life. In that environment, discussions about growth are not enough. What matters more is how that growth is shared, and whether compensation reflects the real cost of living. Without that alignment, the gap between effort and reward will only keep widening.

“Our businessmen want to build on things they don’t have yet.”

Alemayehu Ketema, president of the Ethiopian Real Estate Developers Association (EREDA), told the Amharic magazine Ghion about what he thinks is the mindset of businesspeople. He believes they tend to focus on what they lack rather than what they have when starting out.

75.5

The profit margin, in percentage, of the Development Bank of Ethiopia (DBE) during the 2023/24 financial year. With revenue of over seven billion Birr, the margin was the highest among the 30 state-owned enterprises, exceeding those of iconic enterprises such as Ethiopian Airlines, Commercial Bank of Ethiopia, and Ethio telecom. The Ethiopian Minerals Corporation (EMC) had the lowest profit margin at 189.8pc below zero.

Ministry Reports Export Earnings Jump, Driven by Gold, Coffee Gains

The Minister of Planning & Development, Fitsum Assefa (PhD), reported to the Council of Ministers that the country’s export sector earned 7.7 billion dollars in nine months, bringing the country close to its annual target of 9.39 billion dollars. Eight years ago, total export earnings stood at 2.84 billion dollars. By July 2025, that figure had risen to 8.35 billion dollars. Mining led the performance, with gold exports generating more than four billion dollars in nine months 155pc of the target and an 87pc jump from the previous year. Coffee remained a strong performer, earning 1.924 billion dollars, reaching 99pc of its target and growing 28pc year-on-year. Electricity exports brought in 351 million dollars, exceeding the target by 10pc and rising 53pc compared to last year. Not all sectors followed the upward trend. Flower exports earned 351 million dollars, meeting only 65pc of the target and declining 14pc year-on-year. Pulse exports generated 214 million dollars, achieving 88pc of the target but slipping 6pc from last year’s performance.

Solar Initiative Targets Water Access for Farming, Livestock

The World Food Programme, Germany and the Ethiopian government have launched a solar-powered irrigation project in the Somali Region to bolster food security and drought resilience for pastoral communities. Financed by KfW Development Bank, the initiative is expected to support 17,000 pastoral and agro-pastoral households, or around 85,000 people, through improved water access for farming and livestock. Using solar energy to pump water from the Shebelle River, the project aims to enable year-round food production, including during drought periods.

Officials say the initiative is designed to strengthen livelihoods, climate adaptation and long-term resilience. The project has already generated 17.5 million Br in production value during the 2024/25 fiscal year, contributing to higher incomes and stronger protection against climate shocks.

Resilience Financing Proposal Targets Water Systems, Agriculture, Institutions

Ethiopia and Japan are backing a 58.1 million dollar climate resilience initiative, with 50 million dollar expected from the Green Climate Fund, positioning the facility at the center of Ethiopia’s adaptation financing drive. The proposed Climate Resilience & Adaptation among Livelihoods in Ethiopia (CRADLE) program, led by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in partnership with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), featured prominently in talks held in Addis Abeba on April 24 between State Minister of Finance Semereta Sewasew and Japanese Ambassador Atsuyuki Oike. Designed to support communities facing mounting environmental shocks, the program would finance climate-resilient water systems, watershed restoration and sustainable agriculture, while strengthening institutional capacity.

Officials agreed to accelerate technical preparations and submit the proposal to the Green Climate Fund Board before the end of 2026.