FORTUNE+ VIDEO SPONSORED CONTENTS ADVERTORIALS FORTUNE AUDIO Fortune Careers TRADE AFRICA Election 2026 New TIME REMAINING UNTIL ETHIOPIA’S NATIONAL ELECTION 0Days 0Hours 0Minutes 0Seconds

A Vibrant Art Scene Struggles Without a Home-grown Market

Addis Fine Arts, the country’s leading gallery, convened a candid conversation in October this year, bringing on board three well-known figures in the contemporary arts scene, who sat before a modest crowd and confronted a painful truth.

Dubbed “Ethiopian Art & the Economics of Collecting,” the gathering recognised that demand for local art is drying up. According to organisers, the local art market is struggling, with a lack of a robust collector base threatening the sustainability of artists and galleries. They insisted, rather melancholically, that the idea of collecting art as an investment remains unexplored mainly in Ethiopia, despite its long-standing importance in the West and parts of the Global South.

That warning lands harder when set against Ethiopia’s numbers. The country’s GDP per capita exceeded 1,000 dollars. However, paintings, sculptures or photographs at the top galleries across Addis Abeba list for anywhere between 500 and 25,000 dollars. For most households, that price is a distant luxury. Even buyers with disposable income may wonder why they should spend thousands of dollars on a canvas instead of booking a weekend in Dubai, complete with photos and gold cufflinks to prove it.

Art offers more than decoration. Paintings, music and sculpture capture the soul of a place, freeze moments in time and transmit cultural memory across generations. In the 21st Century, they also serve as a store of value.

Global investors have treated art that way for decades, and the windfalls can be spectacular. The most famous example arrived in 2017, when a painting attributed (some say questionably) to Leonardo da Vinci sold at Christie’s for 450 million dollars. The buyer, Saudi Arabia’s King, reportedly planned to hang the work in a new national museum, betting that the picture would lure tourists and help diversify the Kingdom’s oil-bound economy.

Closer to home, the career of Ethiopian painter Hana Yilma Godine shows how quickly value can build. Born in 1993 and trained at the Ale School of Fine Arts, she earned her MFA from Boston University in 2020. The New York-based Galerie Friedman signed her soon after, and pieces shown that year at London’s Contemporary African Art Fair fetched between 12,000 and 14,000 dollars. Last year, Hana’s starting prices had climbed to about 100,000 dollars.

A collector who bought one of those early works could, on paper, be staring at a return of roughly 50 times in less than five years. Her market still trails that of Ghana-born star Amoako Boafo, whose portraits cross the one-million-dollar threshold. Yet, the trajectory tells an apparent story. Ethiopian artists can command global attention and serious money when the right forces of institutions and collectors come together.

In Europe and large parts of Asia, school curricula introduce children to art early, nurturing a habit of museum visits and gallery tours. Public institutions then reinforce that education, buying contemporary pieces for permanent displays and weaving local talent into the national narrative. Each acquisition signals confidence, elevates an artist’s profile and stimulates private demand. After all, great artists are made, not born.

Ethiopia has yet to build that machinery at scale. The National Museum hosts historic treasures but devotes limited wall space to living painters. Addis Fine Arts and a handful of smaller spaces do their best, but without a larger collector class, their reach remains narrow. When people with means hesitate, artists lose income, galleries shut doors and a country risks letting future Leonardo stories slip away.

Collectors, defined here as anyone willing to spend any amount on art, whether for passion or profit, can tilt that balance. A single purchase pays an artist. Sharing the work on social media or talking about it at dinner tables plants seeds for future sales. Exhibitions generate buzz and, in today’s attention economy, “it’s all about the hype,” as younger audiences like to say. The media help too. Newspaper profiles, television specials and radio interviews give unfamiliar names a platform and, over time, expand the circle of potential buyers.

Change also depends on perception. Many Ethiopians view art as remote, a pastime for elites or expatriates. Shifting that mindset toward curiosity starts at home. Visiting a gallery, asking questions, and learning the stories behind each brushstroke, those small acts build a culture of appreciation. Some visitors will decide to buy. Others may post a photo or recommend an exhibition to friends. All of it counts.

Institutions, galleries and individuals should share the same assignment. The National Museum could reserve space for contemporary work and stage shows tracing the domestic artistic evolution. Addis Fine Arts and emerging online platforms can expand their rosters by pairing established names with younger talent. Public and private sponsors might commission murals or sculptures for public squares, turning city streets into open-air classrooms.

Above all, anyone with “hard-earned excess cash,” in the organisers’ words, can choose to turn a fraction of that money toward a local canvas instead of another weekend abroad.

Art’s full payoff rarely arrives overnight. Not every painting will return 50 times its purchase price, and some will never appreciate in value. But as collectors worldwide have discovered, a balanced portfolio can treat art as a store of value and a hedge against more volatile assets. For Ethiopia, the rewards can run deeper. A vibrant market keeps artists working, galleries open and cultural heritage alive. It tells young painters that their voices matter and signals abroad that the country’s creative economy is worth watching.

The discussion at Addis Fine Arts ended on a hopeful note. Panellists urged attendees to become advocates, whether by buying a small piece, inviting friends to an opening, or simply sharing news of upcoming shows. The fate of Ethiopian art will be decided not only by curators in distant capitals but by choices made in Addis Abeba living rooms.

Transport Authorities Move to Rein in Road Fatalities with Sweeping Safety Overhaul

With the Council of Ministers passing a regulation that year, enacting legislation Parliament passed two years ago, the regulation of the transport sectors has entered a new phase. Its stated goal is “to increase road safety to a higher level and reduce the risk caused by road traffic, setting internationally accepted standards and strategies.” It is a clear move from reactive rule-making to preventive and evidence-based regulation.

The latest lawmaking process scraps an earlier regulation passed in 2011 and an amendment six years later. It tried to fold them into a single, nationwide framework built on the safe system approach championed by the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the United Nations “Decade of Action for Road Safety,” which will run until the end of this decade.

The amendment enacted in 2017 sought to push Ethiopia toward safe system principles but fell short of that goal. It sharpened definitions, raised fines, and clarified how traffic controllers should do their jobs, yet it never thoroughly neutralised the risk factors that kill and injure thousands each year. Last year’s regulatory changes attempt to finish the job. It lays out duties across all five safe system pillars of users, vehicles, speeds, roads, and post-crash response. It backs them with measurable requirements.

For the first time, domestic traffic law defines a novice driver as someone with fewer than two years behind the wheel and a young driver as anyone aged 18 to 29. It introduces terms such as transitional speed zone and dangerous goods, and links its enforcement system not only to traffic-control police but also to transport controllers. The Road Safety & Insurance Fund Service (RSIFS), created under the new measure, will channel funds into crash data systems, driver training, and victim compensation.

These institutional threads tighten a legal fabric that once showed gaps and loose ends.

Every motor-vehicle occupant must now wear a seat belt, a rule that once covered only front-seat passengers. Minors under 13 remain barred from riding up front, and the law now demands that “a child shall be properly fastened with a seat-belt or child-restraint system appropriate to their age and size.” This explicit nod to child-restraint systems harmonises with WHO guidance that car seats and boosters slice child fatalities by up to 70pc.

Motorcyclists gain clearer protection, too. Riders and passengers should wear certified helmets, and retailers are prohibited from selling headgears that fail the technical standards set by the Ministry of Transport & Logistics (MoTL). With two-wheel crashes accounting for a larger share of urban road deaths, federal transport authorities have aligned their rules with the global benchmark.

Drink-driving rules keep the 0.05g/100 ml blood-alcohol ceiling, but the new regulation adds teeth. Police may now conduct random breath tests, use evidential breathalysers, and hand out on-the-spot penalties from license suspensions to impoundments. Novice drivers face a new zero-tolerance clause. Any alcohol at all violates the law, mirroring WHO advice for high-risk groups.

Speed management gets a rewrite. The regulation trims the urban default to 40Km/h and introduces 30Km/h “special-protection zones” around schools, hospitals, and dense neighbourhoods. A new transitional-zone rule instructs drivers to slow gradually as they enter lower-speed areas, reducing rear-end crashes that follow sudden braking. Fixed and mobile speed cameras feed a national demerit-point system that can suspend licenses when point thresholds are reached, echoing the automated enforcement models used in the United Kingdom (UK) and Sweden.

Distractions behind the wheel no longer stop at handheld phones. The legislation outlaws reading, typing, or watching any screen while driving unless the device is mounted and used solely for navigation purposes. Fines and demerit points now scale with the severity of the violation instead of falling under a one-size-fits-all penalty.

Beyond rules for users, the regulation embeds a systemic shift. The RSIFS would bankroll data systems and safety programs, turning crash numbers into actionable intelligence. Coordination between the Transport Ministry, regional offices, and municipalities is required, casting safety as a shared duty rather than a problem for individual drivers alone. By defining novice and young drivers and spelling out risk-based penalties, the law paves the way for a graduated licensing scheme and harsher consequences for repeat offenders. It even clarifies what counts as a serious or minor injury in crash reports, a detail that will smooth reporting to the WHO and UNECE databases.

If written rules alone saved lives, Ethiopia might already have safer roads. Implementation has always been the weak link, and last week’s regulation will face the same test. Traffic police and transport controllers should read from the same playbook, but their training, tools, and procedures vary widely. In rural districts, many officers lack modern equipment or clear guidelines, encouraging discretion, inconsistency, and, at times, corruption.

A national enforcement-professionalisation drive with standardised curricula and digital ticketing could reduce discretion and build trust. A National Road Safety Implementation Taskforce, either new or grafted onto an existing body, could keep federal and regional agendas in sync.

Many roads outside the capital still lack basic lane markings, zebra crossings, signage, and speed-calming measures. Even in cities, safety gaps around schools, markets, and dense neighbourhoods remain. A targeted program for thermoplastic road paint, reflectorised signs, raised crossings, and well-designed speed bumps, steered by crash-hotspot data, would pay quick dividends. Safe Routes to School or Market campaigns could layer extra protection where pedestrian risk is highest.

Behavioural change may be the toughest nut to crack. Roads double as social spaces where pedestrians, livestock, vendors, religious processions, and vehicles of all shapes mingle. Formal crossings and speed rules often collide with daily habits. New obligations, including child seats, broader phone bans, and speed limit zones, will take root only if the public hears and trusts the message.

A nationwide campaign using community radio, religious leaders, school systems, and local elders would likely resonate better than a top-down media blitz. The regulation itself envisages student traffic ambassadors and volunteer marshals. Plugging these into a coordinated education strategy could bridge the gap between law and life. Taxi cooperatives, freight unions, and bus associations wield clout and may resist rules that threaten income. Early dialogue with these groups and transitional incentives, such as public recognition for compliance and lower fees for sustained safety performance, could turn potential opponents into cautious allies.

The local vehicle fleet skews old, with many cars lacking working seat belts, sound brakes, or decent headlights. Upgrading them costs more than many owners can afford. Certified helmets and child seats can be priced out of reach. Electronic speed cameras and data systems also cost money and take time to install. Targeted subsidies, repair vouchers, or low-interest loans could help owners bring vehicles up to code. Phased compliance deadlines would avoid sudden shocks to livelihoods. Blended financing that taps government, donors, insurers, and the new Fund Service can keep these programs alive beyond the first burst of enthusiasm.

Cyclists, pedestrians, and animal-drawn carts populate rural and semi-urban roads without visibility gear, and they seldom receive formal training. Reflective materials, bike helmets, and visibility devices for carts cost little and could slash nighttime crashes. Community marshals stationed on busy market days or during school hours could provide an extra buffer where traffic is most chaotic.

Data remains the backbone of the safe system, but Ethiopia still struggles with under-reporting, fuzzy injury categories, and siloed databases. A national crash database, fed by mobile reporting tools capable of offline operation, would allow officers to upload standardised forms in real time. Linking that data to hotspot maps makes enforcement and infrastructure spending smarter and more transparent.

The legal and judicial branches are not immune to strain. Terms like negligent driving and serious injury, even with new definitions, can still sow confusion. Without clear interpretive guidance, disparate courts may rule differently, clogging the system. Issuing explanatory circulars and compiling administrative precedents could help standardise enforcement. Training judges on the new framework and creating fast-track traffic courts could prevent backlogs and maintain credibility.

Africa Bears the Brunt of De-dollarisation Dreams

Global finance is changing, but the shift away from the US Dollar remains more rhetoric than reality. For years, governments have invoked de-dollarisation as a political slogan, a way to signal distance from Washington without confronting the harder task of fixing domestic economic weaknesses.

Even as global policymakers discuss alternatives with growing seriousness, the Dollar still sits firmly at the centre of world reserves, trade, and capital flows. Nowhere is the difference between aspirational talk and practical action more consequential than in Africa.

BRICS has become the most vocal champion of this agenda, using its summits to amplify proposals for alternatives to the Dollar. Formed by Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, the bloc brings together economies large enough to demand attention when they call for a more diversified system. Its members have experimented with local-currency settlements, extended development finance in non-dollar denominations, and built payment channels designed to operate outside the Dollar’s orbit. These initiatives have shown that global finance need not be exclusively dollar-denominated.

However, the bloc’s efforts have also exposed the project’s structural limits. BRICS does not have a shared currency. Its members remain divided on what a unified path should look like, and many of their strategic interests diverge.

India, despite its economic weight, avoids endorsing any framework that resembles a joint currency arrangement. Its policymakers show no interest in severing ties with US capital markets or abandoning the security that Dollar-linked financial systems provide. China is pushing for a broader international role for the renminbi but is moving gradually, prioritising stability over disruption. South Africa, deeply integrated in Western-led financial systems, is wary of provoking economic or political risks at home.

Beyond BRICS, other shifts in global reserves and settlement patterns are occurring, but on modest scales. Some central banks in Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America are spreading their reserve holdings across multiple currencies to protect themselves from volatility and the political leverage that comes with overreliance on US policy decisions. Certain commodity traders have begun settling transactions in non-dollar currencies.

But these developments do not mirror an organised and ideological campaign against the Dollar. They are pragmatic moves targeting risk management, not the foundation of a new financial order.

For African economies, these debates should not be abstract. Most countries on the continent depend heavily on dollar-denominated imports, such as fuel, food, machinery, pharmaceuticals, and capital goods. When the Dollar strengthens, the cost of essential items rises sharply in local currency terms, even if global prices remain unchanged. Households feel the pressure, businesses struggle to manage inventory costs, and governments face increased budgetary strain.

Ethiopia illustrates this exposure clearly. Its major imports are priced and settled mainly in Dollars. A strong Greenback pushes up domestic costs for fuel, construction materials, and key inputs. In this context, the idea of de-dollarisation takes on a practical dimension. If alternatives were available and reliable, they could lessen the immediate burden of currency swings on the real economy.

But switching the unit of settlement does not by itself insulate an economy from volatility. Without strong monetary policy, disciplined public finances, and institutions capable of commanding trust, shifting away from the Dollar could introduce new vulnerabilities rather than solve old ones.

Ethiopia’s situation shows how much of the problem is domestic rather than global. The government has expressed openness to BRICS-led initiatives, explored alternative currency arrangements with partners, and engaged the IMF on reform programs. But the persistent weakness of the Birr is rooted in domestic fundamentals. As long as the public lacks confidence that the Birr could hold its value, efforts to diversify away from the Dollar will remain mostly symbolic. The debate abroad will matter little without stability at home.

The credibility of a currency ultimately depends on the quality of economic management. Transparency in policymaking, predictability in fiscal decisions, and consistency in regulatory behaviour are what anchor confidence. Until Ethiopia and other African economies strengthen those foundations, the global conversation about de-dollarisation will remain a discussion rather than a deliverable.

For Africa more broadly, the challenge is to convert the language of global realignment into real domestic capacity. Financial autonomy should not be framed as rejecting the Dollar but as achieving the ability to trade and borrow in multiple currencies, manage exposure prudently, and negotiate international finance from a position of strength. The experiments led by BRICS and other blocs can provide leverage, but leverage is only useful for countries that have prepared their own institutions to use it effectively.

Despite the headlines about alternatives, the Dollar remains the dominant currency in trade, financial markets, and the reserve portfolios of central banks worldwide. Most African exports and imports are still priced in Dollars. Where countries are trying new settlement systems, they are doing so tentatively, more to hedge against external shocks than to pursue sweeping strategic shifts. In this environment, African governments cannot rely on external alliances or multilateral declarations to deliver structural change. Long-term stability will depend on their own governance, economic credibility, and institutional strength.

For Ethiopia and other countries watching the global debate unfold, the central question is not whether BRICS or any other platform will produce an alternative to the Dollar. The real question is whether African economies are prepared to take advantage of the shifting landscape. Those that combine careful international engagement with strong domestic policies will be better positioned to shape outcomes rather than merely adjusting to them. Those who wait for external actors to drive the change may find themselves exposed to the same vulnerabilities that have defined their financial systems for decades.

The future will favour countries that treat de-dollarisation not as a political slogan but as a gradual and disciplined project grounded in credibility and genuine choice. Africa may gain more room to manoeuvre in a world where financial power is more distributed, but opportunity alone does not guarantee progress. Without stable domestic economic foundations, every round of global debate will remain what it has been so far. Debate, not delivery.

A New Opening for a Fossil-Fuel Phaseout?

Calls to reduce the use of fossil fuels are becoming impossible to ignore. At the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Brazil (COP30), major producers are being pressed to begin planning for the phasing down of oil, gas, and coal in a just and orderly way.

For decades, climate negotiations have focused on emissions targets and clean-energy pledges while sidestepping the politically explosive question of whether, and how quickly, countries should phase out fossil-fuel production. COP28 broke new ground by introducing the phrase “transition away from fossil fuels,” but real progress has remained slow and uneven. At COP30, Brazilian President Luiz Lula da Silva has reset the tone, declaring that “the Earth can no longer sustain the intensive use of fossil fuels” and calling for a clear roadmap for phasing them out.

Resistance to a phaseout has historically come from major producer countries and energy companies. But many governments with legitimate social-justice concerns are also reluctant to support such a move, fearing it would impede efforts to reduce inequality and fund essential services.

Brazil, a rising energy power with vast renewable potential, but also deep poverty and a thriving offshore oil sector, is a prime example. When Lula argued that fossil-fuel dependence must end in a “planned and just” manner, he signalled that an orderly phaseout can support development rather than undermine it.

For Brazil, the challenge is to strengthen its global standing while navigating its own energy transition. Lula’s plan for a national fund that would direct some of Brazil’s oil revenues toward the green transition reflects this balance. The rents of the old economy would be used to build the new one without harming workers and vulnerable communities.

Such an approach is not without precedent. Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, built on decades of oil revenues, invests heavily in low-carbon sectors worldwide and supports initiatives like the Amazon Fund. And in Southeast Asia, East Timor, heavily reliant on petroleum and gas, has pursued diversification strategies financed through its own resource revenues.

These examples show that channelling fossil-fuel income toward the green transition is both feasible and necessary. For too long, the idea has been treated as taboo by climate advocates, owing to fears that even discussing oil money might legitimise continued extraction.

Avoiding the issue, however, leaves resource-dependent countries without the means to finance their transitions before revenues dwindle. Until climate finance reaches the scale required, governments should support equitable and justice-oriented energy transitions by channelling fossil-fuel revenues through well-governed sovereign wealth funds.

Early efforts to repurpose resource income point to a broader shift. A decade ago, few governments could imagine a future without fossil fuels. But economic realities have changed. Renewables are now cost-competitive, clean-fuel technologies have matured, and developing countries increasingly view the energy transition as a pathway to greater productivity, resilience, competitiveness, and sovereignty.

Brazil’s experience illustrates this trend. Like many resource-rich countries, it has long relied on oil rents to fund social programs and infrastructure. Between 2011 and 2023, only a tiny fraction of federal royalties flowed to its main climate fund. It has since expanded its biofuels industry, started developing sustainable aviation fuels, and scaled up renewables, generating jobs in regions historically tied to extraction and showing that the energy transition can reinforce, not replace, a country’s development agenda.

Rising geopolitical tensions call for the urgent need to diversify away from fossil fuels. With supply chains realigning, competition for global leadership in battery production, green hydrogen, sustainable infrastructure, and circular manufacturing is intensifying. At the same time, the International Energy Agency (IEA) expects oil demand to plateau by 2035 even without stronger climate action, while OPEC sees demand growing through mid-century.

Whatever the exact timeline, economies that are slow to diversify will be left with stranded assets once global consumption declines.

That risk is especially acute for Brazil, which has invested heavily in deep-water drilling. Just weeks before COP30, Brazil’s environmental agency granted Petrobras a license to drill at the mouth of the Amazon River, a highly sensitive ecological zone. Petrobras and some government officials argue that exploration is necessary for energy security, while environmental groups say the decision undermines Brazil’s climate leadership.

A clear and well-structured transition plan, rather than ad hoc, case-by-case decision-making, might have prevented these tensions. If Brazil wants its COP30 leadership to have a lasting impact, it should ensure that its new transition fund is more than symbolic. The government should clarify revenue allocations, establish transparent governance structures, and encourage civil society participation. Integrating the fund into the country’s ecological transition plan would help channel resources toward job-creating sectors such as sustainable fuels, renewable energy, green industry, and climate-resilient infrastructure.

Internationally, Brazil should use its COP30 presidency to advance a cooperative approach to phasing out fossil fuels. The Beyond Oil & Gas Alliance, launched by Costa Rica and Denmark, has attempted to promote supply-side action, but major producers have stayed on the sidelines. Brazil could help bridge this divide by encouraging parties to develop guidelines for an orderly and flexible reduction in fossil-fuel production.

These discussions should produce a roadmap with clear criteria for determining realistic timelines that reflect national capabilities and historical responsibilities, as well as mechanisms that build on existing institutions rather than adding new layers of bureaucracy. Equally important, the fossil-fuel phaseout should be central to climate negotiations. This would signal that multilateralism still matters; that countries can collectively confront even the most politically sensitive issues; that fossil fuels are no longer treated as untouchable; and that producer states are willing to engage in a structured and cooperative process.

Ultimately, the green transition depends on confronting the issue of fossil-fuel revenues head-on. Otherwise, climate ambition cannot be reconciled with economic and political realities. Brazil has taken a bold step by raising this question at COP30 and framing transition as a socioeconomic opportunity, not merely an ecological imperative. The challenge now is to turn the resulting discussion into a coherent plan, at home and globally.

Bank of America Sponsorship Signals Coming of Age for Great Ethiopian Run

The announcement that Bank of America (BoA) would sponsor the Great Ethiopian Run (GER) arrived at a crucial moment of the 25th anniversary of the iconic event.

This partnership carries more than symbolic weight, as it marks a coming of age for an institution that, over a quarter-century, has grown from an ambitious vision into one of Africa’s most celebrated mass-participation road races. In a country where sport has long struggled for structure and commercial traction, the BoA deal heralds a new chapter, one where discipline, professionalism, and the commercial logic of sponsorship come to the fore.

It was never about staging a single race. From the earliest days, those involved in the GER conceived it as a sustainable business, a platform with the potential to influence the fabric of national culture and make running a way of life for Ethiopians. That aspiration took shape in a country where few had seen the commercial promise of sport. Haile Gebrselassie, the living legend who gave Ethiopia glory on global stages, inspired, helping embed running in the country’s sense of self.

Richard Nerurkar arrived with professional know-how and an uncompromising work ethic, shaping the event’s ethos. Dagmawit Amare, who would later steer the race into its years of institutional maturity, brought operational stability and strong leadership. These individuals built more than a sporting event. They created a national institution that continues to unite and inspire.

Societies ascribe meaning to events, traditions, and practices, but those meanings can shift or be misunderstood. Sponsorship is one such concept, often seen in Ethiopia as a simple act of generosity or philanthropy. That reading misses the mark. True sponsorship is a business transaction, undertaken with clear expectations and measurable returns. Whether the backing comes in cash or in kind, the sponsor seeks something in return, such as exposure, image-building, sales, or direct access to fans and consumers.

The process typically unfolds in four stages.

First is exposure, ensuring people know the sponsor exists. Then comes education, informing the audience about what the sponsor offers. The third stage is image building, using the partnership to enhance perceptions of the sponsor’s brand. Finally, the most critical stage is sales, which drives consumer loyalty and behaviour and ultimately justifies the investment.

Some sponsors prioritise brand awareness, as Rakuten did when it partnered with the Golden State Warriors to establish itself in the American market. Others, at different points along the continuum, may be seeking a change in public perception or a tangible bump in sales. In all cases, the bottom line remains the same. Sponsorship should deliver value.

The Ethiopian sporting community need not search far for an example of sponsorship done well. The textbook is already in front of them. All they need to do is study what the Great Ethiopian Run has been doing for 25 years. In a country where many sports organisations still struggle to define the nature of their partnerships, the GER has quietly set the standard. Its approach is rooted in transparency, accountability, and the understanding that successful sponsorship is built not on handouts, but on mutual benefit.

The arrival of Bank of America as a sponsor is more than a feather in the event’s cap. It reflects what marketers call the “reverse image effect,” where the prestige and strength of a global brand transfer directly to the property it supports. The partnership instantly boosts the event’s brand value and credibility, opening the door to further commercial growth. The implications reach beyond the GER itself, sending a clear message to the broader Ethiopian sporting industry. Global brands invest, but only where they see professionalism, structure, and clear commercial value.

For those still seeking to understand how to build lasting sports institutions, the lesson is close to home. The Great Ethiopian Run has succeeded not because it enjoyed a privileged environment or special treatment, but because it chose to treat sport as a business, sponsorship as investment, and the public as an engaged community. The Run faces the same infrastructure limitations and the same economic headwinds as every other sporting body in the country. Its choices have made the difference.

The question is whether other sports will heed the lesson.

Football in Ethiopia, for instance, stands in sharp contrast. Two years ago, I led a wide-ranging study commissioned by the Ethiopian Premier League (EPL) to map the game across the nation. Drawing on the experiences of over 140 countries and nearly 90 interviews with key stakeholders ranging from federation officials and coaches to players and journalists, the study also included a comprehensive analysis of national, continental, and FIFApolicy frameworks, as well as national labor and trade laws, and is supported by more than two hundred scholarly sources, the findings were blunt. Ethiopian football is financially unsustainable.

Most clubs depend almost entirely on local government budgets. The best estimate puts average club expenditure at 75 million Br annually, with 75pc of that going to salaries and the rest to basics such as transport and accommodation. That leaves little for infrastructure, development, or marketing. This is not a sustainable way to build a sports industry. It is similar to pouring water on sand.

What emerged from the study was a homegrown solution rooted in community ownership. This model aligns with Ethiopian sport policy, which states that the government should facilitate development, while the community owns the clubs. The recommendation proposed dividing ownership between registered fans (30pc), the public (40pc), and the state (30pc). The term public is not abstract as it encompasses local business owners, residents, hotel and motel operators, teachers, banks, universities, breweries, members of the diaspora, and, over the long term, responsible foreign investors.

This structure would encourage accountability and make room for qualified business managers to steer clubs forward, allowing communities to replace them if they fail to deliver, without recourse to political intervention or public subsidy. It is a model grounded in empirical data, upholding global best practices and Ethiopia’s own cultural and economic context.

Over two and a half decades, the GER has internalised the principles that fill sport business management textbooks. It understands the progression from awareness and knowledge to image building and sales. Its partnerships have delivered value not as charity, but as a return on investment. The Bank of America agreement is a logical consequence of this track record, not a coincidence or lucky break. Credible delivery, professional management, and careful brand stewardship paved the way for a sponsor of this scale.

I recall the early years with a sense of pride. In 2006, through an opportunity created by the Great Ethiopian Run, I studied sport management in England and penned an article headlined, “Everyone is a Winner in the Great Ethiopian Run.” My argument was simple. The race had already become more than a competition. Its impact cut across the sporting, health, societal, and historical, as well as the political, economic, and cultural dimensions. Over the years, the event has become a unifying force, inspiring generations, stimulating the economy, and elevating Ethiopia’s global image. Its influence remains woven into the fabric of modern Ethiopian life.

The Great Ethiopian Run offers a different model than the many federations, leagues, and clubs still dependent on government budgets, caught in a cycle of underinvestment and dependency. With the GER, planning, negotiation, delivery, and measurement of partnerships take centre stage. The textbook is not in a foreign capital. It is on the streets of Addis Abeba every year when tens of thousands of people take part in the Run. It embodies the vision of its founders and the tenacity of those who built and protected it.

Being part of the Great Ethiopian Run’s foundation was an exercise in building something that would last. The challenge was not only to get started, but to sustain and grow the institution over time. Building a foundation is important, but sustaining it for a quarter of a century, developing it, and elevating it to where it stands today requires vision, discipline, and relentless dedication. The Run’s success was not accidental. It is the product of consistent leadership and a refusal to compromise on standards.

The new partnership with Bank of America opens a fresh chapter. It brings with it more than commercial capital, but validation of the model the Run has pursued since its inception. I hope that other sporting institutions in Ethiopia will look inward, study the example, and take decisive steps toward a more sustainable and prosperous future for Ethiopian sport.

When Discipline Meets Destiny: The Story of a Dedicated Young Man

Last week, my family and I visited our single friend Mikias, and the visit reminded me just how remarkable his journey has been. We first met him a little over three years ago through a mutual friend. He had heard about the journey that my husband Mike and I’s relationship is taking and our commitment to faith, chastity, and intentional living when he asked a mutual friend to introduce us.

I still remember that day clearly. What was meant to be a simple introduction and dinner turned into hours of meaningful conversation. We talked about faith, discipline, relationships, dreams, and life goals. Mikias turned out to be an exceptional person. His strong values, his ambitious dreams, and his humility were deeply refreshing.

One of the first things that impressed me was his dedication to waiting for the right woman, no matter how long it took. In a world where meaningful relationships are often rushed and taken lightly, he carried a quiet conviction that commitment is sacred and worth the wait.

He spoke calmly with eloquent words. His career goals were equally admirable. He had big visions for his future, fueled by a desire to grow, serve others, and live a purposeful life. He is a private person who dedicates much of his time working, going to the gym, praying, and laying the foundation of his life brick by brick.

But what makes his story even more inspiring is that it didn’t begin with perfection. Mikias has always been honest about the fact that he had his fair share of toxic friends and had vices that dithered him from his dreams. He experienced moments where negative influences pushed him downhill and made him lose focus.

What stands out about Mikias is that he didn’t allow that period to define him. When he recognised that his environment was damaging his life, he made the difficult decision to walk away. He cut ties with toxic friends, abandoned unproductive routines, and revived the dreams he once set aside. His transformation began with a simple yet powerful choice: to rebuild, devising creative solutions that earned him wealth.

Seeing him again last Saturday made the depth of that transformation clear. He invited us to his home for luncheon, and the moment we stepped inside, we realised just how far he had come. The hardworking young man we met three years ago had grown into an exceptional person.

He had moved out of his parents’ home and built a life marked by excellence, structure, and purpose. His house, spacious, beautifully designed, and immaculately clean, felt more like a five-star hotel than a bachelor’s residence. Not a single thing was out of place. The floors shone, the furniture looked untouched, and every corner reflected intentional care. It didn’t feel like a home where someone simply lives; it felt like a home someone honours.

Everything about his lifestyle demonstrated discipline. He cooks, cleans, and organises his home himself. His attention to detail shows that he respects the life he has built. Even his two cars parked in his compound, among the most expensive in the city, were neatly arranged, reflecting the same sense of order.

Yet despite all these visible signs of success, the humility he carried three years ago has only grown. He did not boast about his accomplishments or wealth. Instead, he spoke about tending to his business, working with his hands, protecting his peace, and staying focused on his purpose. His conversations were thoughtful, deep, and full of gratitude.

What struck me most was how grounded he remained. Success has not changed his character, if anything, it has strengthened it. He still talks with the same gentle confidence, still upholds his faith at the centre of his decisions, and still values meaningful relationships. He emphasised the importance of avoiding distractions and choosing the right environment. His life is a reminder that success is shaped by years of daily habits, not sudden breakthroughs.

As I listened to him share decades of his journey, I realised how powerful his transformation truly is. He didn’t rise because life got easier, but because of discipline, focus, creativity, and a selective stride through life. He is a living proof that walking away from destructive influences can completely change a person’s future. His journey shows that revival is possible for anyone willing to make sacrifices and commit to their growth.

What inspired me the most during our visit was the atmosphere he created, a blend of peace, order, and gratitude. It reflected not just success, but maturity. It showed that he built his life intentionally, step by step, with patience and resilience. His story is not about money or material achievements. It is about character, renewal, and strength to rise after falling. In a society that often celebrates quick success, Mikias represents the kind of slow, steady growth that produces lasting impact.

Leaving his home that afternoon, I felt a deep sense of admiration. Listening to his over two-decade journey unfold has been a privilege. He has become a prominent example of what a young man can achieve through years of discipline, faith, and personal responsibility. His transformation is a reminder that true success is not measured by appearance but by the consistency and integrity behind it. He shows that dreams can be revived, rebuilt, and fully realised when a person refuses to settle for less than their fullest potential.

A Mogul Shuttering Lives

My commute has lately become a frustrating lesson in logistics. I’ve found a new, compelling reason to take the bus: it consistently drops me closer to my next shuttle by taxi. I once thought I enjoyed walking, but walking a mile just to reach a taxi stand has cured me of that notion.

On a recent bus ride, I tried and failed to shield my face from the morning sun’s glare while working remotely on my phone. The bus’s radio blasting in the background stirred me to listen to an utterly devastating piece on the public radio channel. The program features listeners calling in to voice their complaints and frustrations. That morning, one man’s complaint turned into a public appeal.

He was a driver who made his living through ride-hailing services. He recounted how he sold his car and paid a staggering 950,000 birr, nearly a million in savings, to a company claiming to provide electric vehicles. His plan was to upgrade his business vehicle to an electric car, a cleaner, more efficient model that promised a better future.

However, almost a year later, 11 months, to be precise, he had received nothing.

The consequences were immediate and catastrophic. Without his car, his primary source of income, he could no longer support his family, pay rent or school fees and was at the mercy of his friends. In a truly heartbreaking admission, he revealed he had even sold his wife’s wedding ring just to secure a small, temporary reprieve. He was calling the radio station as a last resort, saying he had exhausted every avenue, from talking to company representatives to filing complaints, all in vain.

His despair was evident. He confessed to having contemplated suicide, feeling completely hopeless and trapped by circumstances engineered by a corporate entity. The only thing preventing him from taking that final, irreversible step, he said, was the thought of abandoning his children.

Sitting there, fighting back the urge to cry on a public bus, the gravity of the situation hit me. It’s a bitter irony that the only way to sustain the life we were given is through constant financial proceeds. It is an even darker reality when the very avenues meant to facilitate existence, honest work and responsible investment, are used by powerful players to engineer ruin.

Imagine the depth of that hopelessness, someone driven to the brink of self-harm, forced to choose between dignity and survival, all while a group of folks or perhaps one individual continues to enrich themselves by scamming the working class. These are people who, whether their wealth was acquired legally or illegally, will never understand the agonising decision to borrow a couple of hundred birr from friends or sell a wedding ring just to buy time.

What makes this situation particularly blatant is that this was not a covert, back-room deal. According to the victim on the radio, the company was openly and repeatedly advertised in the media. Numerous influential artists and celebrities were paid to vouch for this scheme, lending their immense credibility to an operation that has financially devastated the lives of numerous ordinary citizens.

This leads to the most pressing question: Why has the responsible regulatory body failed to take action?

If this were an unlicensed operation conducting shady business, the bureaucratic delays might be understandable. But this is a legal, registered company. It possesses a tax identification number (TIN) and, therefore, pays taxes to the government. It is operating in plain sight, yet it is allowed to continue its devastating scheme. I wonder why this systematic scamming of people is being overlooked? What exactly is this company doing behind the scenes to bury its wrongdoings and evade accountability?

If a company is legally registered, financially compliant, and endorsed by trusted public figures, who can a person trust with their money? The trust necessary for a functional market economy has been broken, and the cost of that breach is measured by the suffering of people like the driver on the radio.

My decision at that moment was clear: I had to be his voice. Someone has to step up to stand by him and many others like him. Bringing this issue to the attention of the wider media and the public sphere might be the only way to force a solution.

And even if we try to entertain the notion that the company did not intentionally set out to defraud people but encountered unforeseen delivery problems, the failure to communicate, apologise, and offer a concrete path to restitution or compensation is indefensible. They must come forward, clear their name, and immediately make amends to the drivers whose lives they have shattered. It is the absolute minimum standard of corporate behaviour.

The modern citizen is often on edge, fragile, and financially vulnerable. Any large-scale betrayal of trust can easily trigger emotional and financial catastrophe, leading some to despair or to retaliate. Businesses must operate with integrity. They should focus on generating profit through legal, ethical means that do not prey on or exploit others’ hopes and dreams. I maintain a firm belief in the eventual consequence of actions, in a form of justice that ensures balance, both now and in the future. We must choose to act with integrity for our own sake, if not for those we affect. The continued authorisation of these ‘legal’ scams is a moral failure that society cannot afford.

1,134

The volume of indoor solid fuel, measured in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m³), used by households in Addis Abeba in a day. A 24-hour average indoor concentration above 1,100 µg/m³ is an extreme pollution level, exceeding the WHO guideline by more than 100 times. In global comparative studies of biomass-dependent rural households, sustained levels above 800 and 900 µg/m³ are rare. Experts warn that, for an urban metropolis with partial electrification, this figure reaches crisis levels.

ETSwitch Signs Strategy Deal to Upgrade Payment Infrastructure

ETSwitch has inked an agreement with global consultancy Genesis Analytics to chart a 15-year roadmap, supported by a detailed five-year strategic plan. Executives disclosed that the engagement follows a full review of the company’s performance over the past five years, opening the door for Genesis to pinpoint priority areas for the next phase of growth.

CEO Yilebes Addis noted that ETSwitch has been developing multiple projects to strengthen the national payments ecosystem. He added that the upcoming five-year plan will align with the Digital Ethiopia programme, the National Bank’s financial inclusion strategy, and recognised global practices from peer institutions.

Genesis Analytics will assess ETSwitch’s current operations to prepare the master plan, with financial institutions expected to weigh in on the future role of the national switch.

The company has also signed a new partnership with Mastercard to expand the country’s digital payment landscape and strengthen its link to global financial networks. The is expected to introduce secure, internationally accepted payment solutions for banks, businesses, and consumers. Both organisations plan to explore and roll out a range of cross-border payment capabilities.insurance nationwide.

Amhara Bank Posts Significant Profit, Revenue Growth

Amhara Bank has exited its loss position, posting a profit before tax of 655 million Br, an increase of 85 pc, or 301 million Br, compared with the previous fiscal year. The result was announced at the bank’s general assembly last week at Millennium Hall. Board Chairperson Gashaw Debebe noted that the bank’s paid-up capital has reached 7.4 billion Br.

uted part of the growth to the release of 975.7 million Br previously suspended by the National Bank of Ethiopia (NBE), which had withheld the funds during the bank’s establishment due to incomplete documentation. Gashaw said the bank has now surpassed the minimum capital requirement set for July 2026.

The bank also reported revenue of 5.6 billion Br for the fiscal year, up 29 pc from the previous year, with interest income making up 80 percent of the total. President Yohannes Ayalew said the performance reflects steady improvement and sets a positive outlook for the bank.

ArifPay Launches Digital Switch for Microfinance Institutions

ArifPay Financial Technologies has rolled out two products designed to plug the country’s Microfinance Institutions (MFI) into the digital ecosystem, marking a shift from cash-driven operations. The announcements were made during the Arif Microfinance Summit, held in partnership with the Ethiopian Fintech Industry Transformation Forum.

The centrepiece, the ArifPay MFI Switch, is presented as a secure infrastructure that will connect all MFIs directly to the national payment system, enabling real-time digital services. Through ArifPay’s digital wallet, clients will be able to manage accounts, access loans, and make electronic payments.

The initiative targets the country’s vast MFI sector, which serves millions of low-income and rural households with limited digital access. ArifPay, employing more than 120 staff, currently handles transactions worth up to 680 million Br each day.