Addis Abeba Rewrites Rules for Public Projects

.

A new rulebook ratified by Addis Abeba’s city cabinet is sending shockwaves through the capital’s construction industry, altering procurement, project eligibility, and financial viability.

While officials frame the overhaul as an ambitious effort to enhance transparency, quality assurance, and fiscal discipline, contractors warn of a looming slowdown, pricing distortions, and exclusionary practices that could upend smaller players. The new regulation promises to change how every building, bridge and condominium block in the capital is built.

Two months ago, the city cabinet approved the lengthy regulation governing procurement and work-order procedures for construction contractors, a document that spells out in minute detail what they should complete, how they charge, and when they can bid on their next job. No builder may start another housing, corridor or riverside project until inspectors confirm that 85pc of its last contract from the city administration is complete.

The regulation declares an ambition “to ensure construction works are completed on time, within budget and to the required quality” while creating a transparent system for hiring and overseeing contractors. It forbids any request for a price revision once the ink is dry on a deal. For every publicly funded build, a fixed-price formula will apply, where if two comparable projects arise in different districts, they should carry the same unit costs.

These benchmarks, to be calculated every three months by the Design & Construction Works Bureau after market surveys, are meant to stamp out the bargaining that has long inflated budgets. Before a shovel can touch soil, a committee of seven, comprising experts from Housing Development & Administration and Finance bureaus, Building Permit & Supervision Authority, the Beautification & Green Development Office, housed in Mayor Adanech Abiebie’s office, would review bids, confirm that a contractor owns or leases a quarry for aggregates, possesses a licensed dump for spoil and has arranged alternative facilities if either is absent.

Only after such a review does the bureau with the public project have its officials sign a contract. Officials at the city's Finance Bureau, the office tasked with enforcement, have begun briefing district engineers and accountants, but admit that full implementation is still months away.

Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed (PhD) has pledged to Parliament that his Administration would see through the building of 1.5 million homes across the country in six years. Addis Abeba City government's share of that promise remains heavy, with planners hoping to begin the construction of 100,000 dwellings in the current fiscal year while pushing ahead with sweeping corridor and riverside projects that already clog thoroughfares with scaffolding and traffic diversions.

There is no shortage of companies lining up for the work. More than 35,000 domestic construction firms and 151,000 professionals are active nationwide, though officials of the Ministry of Urban & Infrastructure describe their collective performance as “unsatisfactory”. Its senior officials warned that tighter rules were inevitable, while non-compliance could lead to contracts being voided outright.

Any firm that had a city contract terminated in the past two years is barred from participating in new bids. Prime contractors should have completed at least three earlier projects, one similar in nature to the new job. They should commit the listed workforce and machinery and subcontract no less than 20pc of peripheral tasks, such as plumbing or landscaping, to at least five smaller companies.

Not surprisingly, elements of the new regulation, such as the threshold and the ban on price adjustments, have rattled the industry.

For Mehdin Mohammed, general manager of UMC Building Construction, a firm with dozens of sites and active in the construction sector for close to a decade, these are "near impossible" to comply with in a volatile market. He argued that if a company has moved 40pc of a complicated build in six months, that is real progress.

The percentage of a project completed shouldn't measure contractor performance," he said. "Excluding it from new bids simply because it hasn't reached 85pc makes no sense.”

Inflation is Mehdin’s second worry, with cement, steel and diesel prices changing twice a month.

“A fixed cost can turn a contract into a loss and push us to abandon the site,” Mehdin told Fortune. "Soil conditions, haulage distance and local wages make a tower in affluent Bole markedly dearer than one in hillside Gulele."

Ahmed Seid, who runs Saracon Construction, conceded that professionalism needs a lift in a sector where “anyone with capital can call themselves a contractor,” yet he also sees bias in the regulation. He fears the rule on project completion locks a medium-sized company to one project, while giants with deeper pockets can juggle several.

“It favours firms with muscle,” he said.

Ahmed also viewed the demand for the three prior jobs as slippery. He was unable to distinguish whether the idea of "similar" refers to value or structure.

"Either way, newcomers struggle to qualify,” said Ahmed.

Penalties bite hard, as failure to meet time or quality obligations can trigger a two-year ban from municipal bidding and open the door to legal action. If 10pc of the work remains and the delay continues, fines would be one-thousandth of the project’s total cost for every day overdue.

Public works have become the capital’s defining feature of the past decade. Since 2015, state-led construction, anchored in transport, housing and public buildings, has absorbed a disproportionate share of the urban capital spending, reshaping the skyline while straining public finances and administrative capacity. Roads and junction projects, rolled out in parallel, delivered visible gains in connectivity but also entrenched a model that prioritises expansion over operational efficiency.

Condominium housing projects, marketed as solutions to chronic shortages, have produced dense clusters of mid-rise blocks on the urban periphery, bundled with roads and basic utilities. Yet studies of these estates revealed uneven service provision and experimental infrastructure fixes, including unconventional wastewater systems in areas where sewer networks were absent.

For a city that has allotted 71.pc of its 350 billion Br budget for the fiscal year, behind the concrete and steel lies a consistent pattern of underperformance. Academic and technical assessments of public projects in Addis Abeba converge on familiar culprits of unrealistic planning, delayed approvals, weak project management and chronic financing gaps. Time overruns are the norm rather than the exception, driven by slow decision-making by clients and consultants, frequent design changes and delayed payments. Safety and quality lapses, particularly in temporary works such as scaffolding, have added hidden costs, accounting for a material share of project delays and site accidents.

Construction spending has scaled from billions to tens of billions of Birr annually, inflated by rising input costs and foreign-exchange constraints. Yet comprehensive, transparent accounting remains elusive, with city budgets blending construction, operations and off-budget financing.

Addis Abeba’s construction boom has altered the city’s physical form, expanding roads, housing stock and public facilities at a pace unmatched in its history. But experts say the decade-long record showed diminishing returns from sheer scale alone. Without stronger front-end planning, more transparent accountability, and a shift from building more to building better, the capital risks entrench perpetual construction, persistent delays, and a city that is always on the verge of completion, but never quite finished.

The experts who have long been calling for discipline in the sector welcomed the city administration's resolve. Abebe Dinku of Addis Ababa University, the German-educated civil engineering professor, is known to be one such voice of authority. He applauds the city administration for trying to inject discipline into a sector with an ever-growing public projects. Yet, he worries that the authors of the regulation may have confused contractors with developers. The latter can bankroll buildings in return for future sales and are therefore less dependent on advance payments.

“The regulation is silent on how builders are supposed to mobilise funds,” said Abebe.

He called the fixed-price doctrine "unrealistic," recalling health centres and regional universities that were mired in dispute when a similar system was tried under the previous administration. Abebe cautioned that fixed costs overlook the sharp cost differences between neighbourhoods, and imported construction materials inevitably cause sudden cost swings. Past disputes between contractors and the city administration have drained public coffers and delayed projects by several years.

However, Abebe’s emphatic criticism focused on the process, in which the guidelines were issued before consultation.

"That is the wrong way round,” he told Fortune.

PUBLISHED ON [ VOL , NO ]