Radar | May 26,2021
December 19 , 2021
By Mariana Mazzucato ( is professor in the Economics of Innovation & Public Value at University College London. ) , Ilona Kickbusch ( is founder and chair of the International Advisory Board of the Global Health Center at the Graduate Institute in Geneva. )
It beggars belief, but it is true: In the midst of the COVID-19 crisis, the member states of the World Health Organisation (WHO) are still pondering whether, and by how much, they should increase their regular financial contributions to the organisation, whose work continues to save lives within and beyond their borders.
While some may think the WHO is sufficiently financed, the opposite is true. The WHO’s budget structure cripples and undermines its mandate to act as the world’s principal international public-health organisation. Less than 20pc of the WHO’s budget comes from regular fees (“assessed contributions”) paid by member states. The heavy reliance on voluntary contributions by member states and other funders severely hampers the WHO’s ability to work on its core activities, leaves it vulnerable to political pressures, and skews its priorities toward individual countries’ preferences.
The acute need to support the WHO’s critical work to overcome the pandemic crisis and achieve “Health for All” is self-evident, as is the organisation’s indispensable leadership role in health globally. The WHO is the most important global coordination mechanism for preparing for and responding to pandemics and other health threats, providing a vital public good that serves all countries. It is therefore imperative that member states support the proposals from a WHO working group to reform the organization’s financing, including increasing assessed contributions as a share of its budget from 16pc to 50pc.
Improving both the quantity and quality of financing for the WHO is a matter of global urgency. Member states waste no time paying lip service to the WHO’s relevance. But how well it can deliver is predicated on how well it is financed. And as we note in our work for the WHO’s Council on the Economics of Health for All, finance is not neutral: the type of finance available affects the allocation and, ultimately, the outcome of investments.
Strengthening the WHO provides the best return on investment for health. Billions are being proposed – such as by the G20 High-Level Independent Panel on Financing the Global Commons for Pandemic Preparedness & Response – to set up and finance new global health-security institutions that cannot guarantee broad political buy-in, especially from the Global South. There simply is no logical reason why member states should place heavy bets on a new venture that might not gain broad support over-investing in their existing organisation, which most certainly can deliver more if funded accordingly.
It is simple: the greatest potential for global health solidarity lies with the WHO. Reliable financing by its owners – the 194 member countries – would make all the difference to global health cooperation and demonstrate the effectiveness of multilateral solutions to international challenges.
The time to walk the talk is now. Too many member states have long been indifferent to the need to strengthen the WHO or invest in health. It should not have been this way before COVID-19, and it should not continue being this way after the pandemic.
The hesitancy and reluctance that brought us to this point sharply contrast with the spirit and determination shown a half-century ago, when humans overcame seemingly insurmountable challenges in order to make it to the moon and back. In today’s money, President John F. Kennedy’s moonshot cost a colossal 283 billion dollars, without any guarantee of success. Of course, it did succeed, and in the process, it catalysed cross-sectoral innovation that, in time, gave the world camera phones, better home insulation, and the modern software industry.
In other words, Kennedy’s moonshot boosted economic dynamism and growth through mission-oriented innovation. In comparison, the current financing proposal would only cost all 194 WHO member states 1.2 billion dollars a year, with the certainty that it would significantly strengthen the organisation’s effectiveness. We believe it should actually be more.
Today’s moonshot must be “Health for All.” Most immediately, that means ensuring that COVID-19 vaccines are accessible globally. But it is not a moonshot for the WHO’s member states to finance their own organization so that it can do its job. That is just common sense: the WHO saves the lives of its member states’ people. We already have very affordable, practical, and straightforward solutions for global public health, including financing common goods for health; what we need now is just a fraction of the policymaking ambition we once had.
PUBLISHED ON Dec 19,2021 [ VOL 22 , NO 1129]
Radar | May 26,2021
Agenda | Jul 31,2021
Exclusive Interviews | Jan 05,2020
Radar | Dec 19,2021
Commentaries | Jul 25,2020
Radar | Oct 09,2021
Verbatim | Feb 23,2019
Commentaries | Jun 07,2020
Life Matters | Apr 03,2021
Editorial | May 29,2021
Photo Gallery | 53186 Views | May 06,2019
Fortune News | 46029 Views | Jul 18,2020
Photo Gallery | 44943 Views | Apr 26,2019
Fortune News | 44796 Views | Sep 01,2021
Commentaries | Jul 02,2022
Life Matters | Jul 02,2022
My Opinion | Jul 02,2022
Sunday with Eden | Jul 02,2022
Agenda | Jul 02,2022
Editorial | Jul 02,2022
July 2 , 2022 . By RUTH TAYE
On a rainy afternoon last week, a coffee processing facility in the capital's Akaki-Qality District was abuzz with activ...
November 27 , 2021
Against my will, I have witnessed the most terrible defeat of reason and the most sa...
November 13 , 2021
Plans and reality do not always gel. They rarely do in a fast-moving world. Every act...
October 16 , 2021 . By HAWI DADHI
Residing in a country with no capital market, an organised marketplace for trading se...
The pandemic, armed conflicts and natural disasters have again brought the importance...
Leaders of the National Election Board are in a charm offensive mood, of a sort. Last week, they organised a rare tour for members of the me...
When the country’s most senior diplomats and envoys return back to their posts after two-week debriefings, they leave behind a point or tw...
July 2 , 2022
After nearly two years since the civil war broke out in northern Ethiopia, adversarie...
June 25 , 2022
It is not the best of times to be in charge of governance in Ethiopia, whether at the...
June 18 , 2022
Some of Ethiopia's economic policymakers may take solace from realising that inflatio...
June 11 , 2022
The stereotype many people have of parliamentarians is as clueless seat fillers who exist to rubber stamp legislative bi...
PM Abiy Ahmed (PhD) at a Gala Dinner Called for the Awarding of the Félix Houphouët-Boigny Peace Prize
May 6 , 2019
A couple of years ago, I was having a conversation with a friend and mentor who has...
The advertising industry in Ethiopia has come a long way. They are not only getting better and more creat...
In an economy that has slowed, where consumers are hammered by inflation, and the private sector is teetering on edge, one industry has a br...
July 2 , 2022 . By TSION HAILEMICHAEL
Getu Gelete has struck a deal to acquire a 40pc stake in Habesha Cement S.C., buying out Pretoria Portlan...
July 2 , 2022 . By BERSABEH GEBRE
Lake Ayalew, minister of Revenues, moved to address complaints about inflationary distortions on capital...
July 2 , 2022 . By BERSABEH GEBRE
The federal government is set to roll out a single-account treasury system for the coming budget year, co...
Or see contact page