COVID-19 UPDATES: All the stories and commentaries on Coronavirus, in one place
We thank INTERNEWS for collaborating with us on this project.


The Miltonian Argument to Bring Political Stability


August 7 , 2021
By Christian Tesfaye ( Christian Tesfaye (christian.tesfaye@addisfortune.net) is a researcher and Fortune's Deputy Editor-in-Chief whose interests run amok in the directions of political thought, markets, society and pop culture. )


The power of markets to bring people together cannot be underrated. Milton Friedman, famed economist, infamous if one is more left-leaning, once used the pencil to describe how markets bring people together from around the world. He took from an example utilised by Adam Smith on the division of labour to illustrate how no one person can make the pencil by themselves.

“The wood from which it’s made comes from a tree that was cut down in the state of Washington; to cut down that tree, it took a saw. To make the saw, it took steel. To make the steel, it took iron ore. This black centre, we call it lead but it’s really compressed graphite. I am not sure where it comes from but I think it comes from mines in South America.” he explains, holding a pencil in his hands. “This red top up here, eraser, a bit of rubber, probably comes from Malaya, where the rubber tree is not even native. It was imported from South America by some businessmen with the help of the British government. This brass ferrule, I haven’t the slightest idea where it came from, or the yellow paint, or the paint that made the black lines or the glue that holds it together.”

This was an upgrade to Adam Smith’s example on the production of pins. He explained, in his book “Wealth of Nations,” how 10 people can come together to produce tens of thousands of pins every day as long as they are engaged in specialised skills along the production value chain. What Friedman, who won the Nobel Prize in economics for his monetary stabilisation theory, does is make a political argument for it as well.

“Literally, thousands of people, cooperated to make this pencil,” he continued with his pencil example. “People who don’t speak the same language, who practice different religions, who might hate one another if they ever met. What brought them together and induced them to cooperate to make this pencil? There was no commissars sending out orders from some central office. It was the magic of the price system [channelling Hayek’s price signals here] . . . that brought them together and got them to cooperate to make this pencil so you could have it for a trifling sum.”

The pencil, sold at affordable prices, is a social good created out of economic cooperation. The whole process is not as historically non-violent as Friedman makes it sound. There is the extraction of economic resources from poor countries to wealthy ones, which throughout historical times has been conducted through means of violent colonialism. Even today, raw material exporting countries inevitably grow slower than industralised nations that are able to add value to each good. Raw materials, unless through more efficient means of extraction that brings down costs, or when there are the occasional shortages, have flat returns for the countries that export them. While value-added goods’ exporters see returns exponential growth as more sophisticated products sell for higher than their previous versions.

Still, this is a case for developing countries to invest in value addition and for a fairer and more just global economic order, not for doing away with markets, which can help the world produce social goods. It is the way to make affordable pencils, as well as transition successfully into green economies.

It is globalisation and improved living standards that have put a stamp on raging conflicts since World War II, although the United States and the United Nations take an oversized credit for this. Starved people and unemployed youth fight. Their frustration can easily be harnessed by opportunistic elites into weapons of distraction. We are not really at war between ourselves. They are just battles.

The war is with poverty, and Ethiopia, and Sub-Saharan Africa, have always been losers in this when they took their core focus away from it.



PUBLISHED ON Aug 07,2021 [ VOL 22 , NO 1110]



Christian Tesfaye (christian.tesfaye@addisfortune.net) is a researcher and Fortune's Deputy Editor-in-Chief whose interests run amok in the directions of political thought, markets, society and pop culture.





How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 5 / 5. Vote count: 1

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.


Put your comments here







Editors' Pick




Editorial




Fortune news


Drop us a message

Or see contact page