Fortune News | Dec 11,2021
May 23 , 2021
There is no disagreement as to the global nature of corruption and fraud, which require global solutions. International financial institutions (IFIs) are no different in the accountability mechanisms they apply in carrying out projects in countries such as Ethiopia, writes Yehualashet Tamiru Tegegn (firstname.lastname@example.org), adjunct lecturer at Addis Abeba University and an associate at MTA.
International Financial Institutions (IFIs) are defined as bodies established by agreement between two or more countries in the form of a charter, constitution, or convention. They are intergovernmental since they are the creation of agreements amongst states, and their power and mandate emanate from international agreements.
Accountability mechanisms under IFIs are an avenue for private individuals and groups to file claims against the institution(s) for redressing their grievances on poorly designed and implemented projects.
There is no disagreement as to the global nature of corruption and fraud which require global solutions. IFIs are not different in this respect. This was well noted when the then World Bank president, James Wolfensohn, said that “we need to deal with the cancer of corruption” and “adopt a zero-tolerance approach” towards corruption. As a result, there was a consensus on the establishment of citizen-driven accountability mechanisms for IFIs.
The World Bank has the distinction of being the first IFI to develop accountability mechanisms to enhance its effectiveness. In the 1990s, the Bank was hit by outcry and protest because of maladministration and corruption. By that time, the local and global campaigners from different parts of the world started to gain greater attraction, helping them to exert leverage. On top of this, the donor countries notified the Bank that unless it enhances its transparency and accountability, they will freeze the money they donate. After such relentless pressure, the World Bank was forced to form an Inspection Panel in 1993.
Although external pressure was the principal factor for this, it is difficult to rule out the importance of internal board pressure as well. The Panel is composed of three independent members from different nationalities that are appointed by the executive directors of the World Bank. Generally, the whole process in the Panel can be broadly classified into three: registration, eligibility, and investigation. Its purpose is to carry out investigations to measure the level of compliance. For instance, an executive director may, in the particular case of alleged severe violations of such policies and procedures, ask the Panel for an investigation and the Board may at any time instruct it to conduct an investigation. Under this process, a single party is not qualified as a requester, but two or more persons with a common concern.
Once the Bank receives the claim from the people, it rarely considers the claimant's interest to resolve the matter. This makes the whole process at the Inspection Panel to be geared more towards compliance orientation rather than problem-solving. A combination of two approaches was recommended to address this: compliance review and problem-solving through the instrumentality of creating an independent institution. The formation of a Compliance Review & Problem-Solving Mechanism (CRPSM) was suggested, which would have, among other things, both compliance review function and could undertake a problem-solving exercise.
The power and jurisdiction of the Inspection Panel are limited to the International Bank for Reconstruction & Development (IBRD) and the International Development Association (IDA). The other members of the World Bank Group - such as the International Finance Corporation (IFC) and Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA), which exclusively deal with private parties, are not subject to scrutiny. As a result of external pressure, however, the World Bank was forced to establish the office of the Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO).
Unlike the Inspection Panel, CAO adopts a less rigid and punitive approach and one that is more flexible and settlement-oriented. With its three main functions: advisory, ombudsman and compliance, the CAO allows a single party to make requests. It should be noted that, as provided under the operational manual, the CAO is not serving as a substitution for international court or the national courts in the host state.
Other financial institutions have walked the path the World Bank has when it comes to establishing accountability mechanisms. With the view of serving as a forum for project beneficiaries to appeal to an independent body, in 1995 the Africa Developmental Bank's (AfDB) Board of Directors approved the establishment of an inspection function. Although it was designed in a similar fashion to that of World Bank’s, it was not established under a standing panel with a separate secretary. There were no surprises when the Board became unsatisfied with the effectiveness of the inspection function and replaced it with a new accountability mechanism which came into force in 2003.
The new one focuses on both compliance review and problem-solving, which are performed through project consultations. Its main function is to review and assesses complaints, collate, integrate internal and external experiences of problem-solving, and provide generic support and advice for operational development in their problem-solving activities.
All in all, accountability mechanisms have thus, over the years, proven their merit. Though the birth of IFIs can be traced back to the Bretton Woods agreement, no accountability mechanisms were in place until the 1990s. Their roles in development and reconstruction have evolved, although the criticisms have barely ever ceased. They are not perfect but neither are they discardable.
PUBLISHED ON May 23,2021 [ VOL 22 , NO 1099]
Fortune News | Dec 11,2021
Radar | Jul 11,2021
Editorial | Apr 08,2022
Radar | Jul 18,2021
Radar | Jun 21,2021
Photo Gallery | 60608 Views | May 06,2019
Photo Gallery | 52552 Views | Apr 26,2019
Fortune News | 49919 Views | Jul 18,2020
Fortune News | 49141 Views | Sep 01,2021
Commentaries | Dec 04,2022
Life Matters | Dec 04,2022
My Opinion | Dec 04,2022
Sunday with Eden | Dec 04,2022
Agenda | Dec 04,2022
Editorial | Dec 04,2022
Jul 2 , 2022 . By RUTH TAYE
On a rainy afternoon last week, a coffee processing facility in the capital's Akaki-Qality District was abuzz with activ...
Nov 27 , 2021
Against my will, I have witnessed the most terrible defeat of reason and the most sa...
Nov 13 , 2021
Plans and reality do not always gel. They rarely do in a fast-moving world. Every act...
Oct 16 , 2021 . By HAWI DADHI
Residing in a country with no capital market, an organised marketplace for trading se...
Leaders of the National Election Board are in a charm offensive mood, of a sort. Last week, they organised a rare tour for members of the me...
When the country's most senior diplomats and envoys return back to their posts after two-week debriefings, they leave behind a point or two...
Dec 4 , 2022
Last week saw enraged university lecturers' threatening to stage a strike. They addre...
Nov 26 , 2022
In the wake of the liberalization of the telecom sector, Ethiopian authorities have m...
Nov 19 , 2022
The rounds of talks to end wars in Ethiopia held in Pretoria, South Africa, and Nairo...
Nov 12 , 2022
Two weeks have passed since negotiators from Ethiopia's federal government and the TP...
What are the odds of seeing a housemaid who loves the job dearly and wakes up every morning to do the chores with excitement? Well, this...
Dec 3 , 2022
The nostalgia for the combustible engine, with the noise and smell of burned fossil f...
Dec 4 , 2022 . By MUNIR SHEMSU
A self-proclaimed industrial park alias "Hawassa Textile & Industrial Park" canno...
Dec 4 , 2022 . By BERSABEH GEBRE
Awash Bank shareholders voted to boost the paid-up capital to 55 billion Br in the ne...
Dec 4 , 2022 . By RAHEL BOGALE
The expansion project under the country's largest referral hospital runs aground due...
Or see contact page