
Nov 9 , 2024
By Hippolyte Fofack
The development interventions maintained by the "Global North" still follow the prevailing top-down, one-size-fits-all approach, especially when it comes to climate finance. Despite contributing the least to the climate crisis, non-Global North countries are on the receiving end of projects designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, writes Hippolyte Fofack, a research associate at the Harvard University Center for African Studies, in this commentary provided by Project Syndicate (PS).
In 2011, the Busan Partnership Agreement recommended a shift toward increased national ownership of the development agenda as part of the international drive for more effective development policies. The agreement was a welcome recognition that lower-income countries were more likely to improve resource allocation and achieve sustainable growth when they set their development priorities.
Over a decade later, the prevailing top-down, one-size-fits-all approach to development interventions remains stubbornly intact. This is particularly true for climate finance, which tends to be largely earmarked for projects aimed at reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including in countries that have contributed the least to the climate crisis. For example, 58pc of the 83.3 billion dollars in climate finance that the Global North delivered to developing countries in 2020 went toward such mitigation initiatives.
The most pressing challenge facing low-income countries is to bolster the capacity of governments and societies to endure and adapt to the adverse effects of global warming. But only 34pc of climate-finance flows to low-income countries, totalling 28.6 billion dollars, went toward adaptation measures in 2020, and that fell to around 27pc in 2021 and 2022 (totalling 24.6 billion dollars and 32.4 billion dollars, respectively). These sums fall far short of the estimated 160 billion to 340 billion dollars needed annually for climate change adaptation in developing countries.
Nearly three-quarters of the climate finance provided to developing countries between 2016 and 2022 came from loans, which could further exacerbate macroeconomic instability and debt vulnerabilities. Close to 60pc of these countries are already confronting or at high risk of debt distress, owing to the "original sin" of foreign borrowing together with growth-crushing interest rates that dramatically increase the fiscal incidence of external debt.
Global investors are drawn to climate mitigation projects because they generate more immediate returns, compared to the longer-term payouts of investments in adaptation. But this skewed approach fails to account for the asymmetric nature of climate change: even though the Global North has historically caused the majority of greenhouse emissions, the Global South, where average annual temperatures in most countries have largely exceeded the upper threshold for life of 24° Celsius, has suffered the worst effects, and is especially vulnerable to further projected increases in average temperatures.
It is hard to imagine how the effects of climate change could be much worse for low-income countries.
In 2022, flooding submerged one-third of Pakistan, killing 15,000 people, forcing more than nine million into poverty, and generating economic losses that amounted to 2.2pc of GDP. In 2023, East Africa – despite contributing only 0.1pc of global GHG emissions – experienced extreme droughts that decimated around 7.4 billion dollars worth of livestock, fueled an alarming hunger crisis, and exacerbated poverty.
The Global North’s failure to take responsibility for rising temperatures and consider vulnerable countries’ specific needs risks further magnifying the climate emergency’s already high economic and social costs in these countries.
Crucially, making progress on adaptation does not depend entirely on successful mitigation measures – the relationship is not unidirectional. Some adaptation initiatives, such as improved building insulation and energy-conservation measures that reduce the need to use coal-fired power plants, can turbocharge mitigation efforts. Unless we adapt our behaviour and systems to moderate the devastating effects of GHG emissions, the social and economic costs of climate change will continue to rise, hitting the most vulnerable countries hardest.
More broadly, building sustainable and resilient infrastructure would mitigate countries’ vulnerability to adverse climate shocks and other related risks. Such infrastructure would not only reduce the direct fiscal impact of such shocks and contingent liabilities that could pose a threat to macroeconomic stability and debt sustainability but could also enable energy-poor countries to leapfrog into a new era of clean power, accelerating the transition to net-zero emissions.
Increasing coordination between adaptation and mitigation efforts could make them more cost-effective and appealing to investors, thereby catalysing more climate adaptation financing in the Global South. At the same time, mobilising more private capital for adaptation requires increasing the number of climate-resilient and investment-ready infrastructure projects at a sustainable pace and with appropriate levels of risk allocation among stakeholders.
A recent analysis conducted by J.P. Morgan of greenfield projects in emerging-market and developing economies estimated that around 1.2 trillion dollars worth of “investable” sustainable infrastructure projects are in the pipeline – representing roughly half of these economies’ annual investment needs for such infrastructure. But, many of these projects are in the very early stages of development and will not be shovel-ready for years to come.
The demand side of the adaptation-financing equation should be strengthened to direct more funding to low-income countries. This would also rebalance the international community’s allocation of climate financing away from its excessive focus on mitigation.
Boosting adaptation financing in the Global South is not only the right thing to do for the planet. It is also smart economics. Preliminary estimates indicate that every dollar invested in adaptation could yield up to 10 dollars in net economic gains. Delaying or short-changing investment in adaptation could raise overall costs, undermine global efforts to reach net-zero emissions by 2050, and limit global warming to the Paris Climate Agreement’s target of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.
The world cannot win the battle against climate change if it neglects an important front – adaptation – on which it is incurring huge losses, especially in human casualties. To avoid focusing exclusively on mitigation, wealthy countries should foster a more inclusive development partnership that narrows the adaptation-financing gap in the most climate-vulnerable countries.
PUBLISHED ON
Nov 09,2024 [ VOL
25 , NO
1280]
Commentaries | Sep 08,2024
Commentaries | May 03,2025
Life Matters | Dec 10,2018
Radar | Feb 04,2023
Editorial | Aug 06,2022
Viewpoints | Jul 03,2021
Viewpoints | Oct 23,2021
Commentaries | Dec 16,2023
Commentaries | Sep 17,2022
Fortune News | Apr 23,2025
My Opinion | 131453 Views | Aug 14,2021
My Opinion | 127805 Views | Aug 21,2021
My Opinion | 125786 Views | Sep 10,2021
My Opinion | 123421 Views | Aug 07,2021
Dec 22 , 2024 . By TIZITA SHEWAFERAW
Charged with transforming colossal state-owned enterprises into modern and competitiv...
Aug 18 , 2024 . By AKSAH ITALO
Although predictable Yonas Zerihun's job in the ride-hailing service is not immune to...
Jul 28 , 2024 . By TIZITA SHEWAFERAW
Unhabitual, perhaps too many, Samuel Gebreyohannes, 38, used to occasionally enjoy a couple of beers at breakfast. However, he recently swit...
Jul 13 , 2024 . By AKSAH ITALO
Investors who rely on tractors, trucks, and field vehicles for commuting, transporting commodities, and f...
Jun 28 , 2025
Meseret Damtie, the assertive auditor general, has never been shy about naming names...
Jun 21 , 2025
A well-worn adage says, “Budget is not destiny, but it is direction.” Examining t...
Jun 14 , 2025
Yet again, the Horn of Africa is bracing for trouble. A region already frayed by wars...
Jun 7 , 2025
Few promises shine brighter in Addis Abeba than the pledge of a roof for every family...
Jun 29 , 2025
Addis Abeba's first rains have coincided with a sweeping rise in private school tuition, prompting the city's education...
Jun 29 , 2025 . By BEZAWIT HULUAGER
Central Bank Governor Mamo Mihretu claimed a bold reconfiguration of monetary policy...
Jun 29 , 2025 . By BEZAWIT HULUAGER
The federal government is betting on a sweeping overhaul of the driver licensing regi...
Jun 29 , 2025 . By NAHOM AYELE
Gadaa Bank has listed 1.2 million shares on the Ethiopian Securities Exchange (ESX),...