Geopolitics, War Crimes,the Balance Sheet of Justice

Oct 7 , 2023.

Addis Abeba found itself the recipient of unexpected benevolence from Europe lately, with two pieces of news that should have warmed the hearts of the senior echelons of Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s (PhD) government.

Ahmed Shide, his finance minister, had been engaged in talks with a high-ranking European diplomat touring East Africa. The pinnacle of these discussions was the signing of an agreement with Jutta Urpilainen, European Union (EU) Commissioner for International Cooperation. This saw a commitment to resume direct budgetary support to Ethiopia, amounting to 650 million euros.

This financial aid, once suspended in the wake of the civil war in northern Ethiopia between the federal government, the forces it assembled, and Tigray Regional State, is part of a much larger one-billion-euro package earmarked for the period spanning 2021 to 2027. This is loaves and fish for a country starved of foreign currency even to pay for essential imports.

However, as with all geopolitical manoeuvres, the crux often lies beneath the surface.

The European Commissioner puts conditions in a firm commitment from Ethiopia’s leaders to 'transitional justice' and 'accountability' concerning the alleged war crimes perpetrated against civilians during the intense two-year conflict. Still, Urpilainen’s diplomatic overtures have struck a chord in Addis Abeba, signalling a potential 'normalisation' of EU-Ethiopia ties, strained since November 2020.

For Prime Minister Abiy, Urpilainen’s visit and her mollifying remarks have solidified his belief that their "strategic partnership" is on the mend. This feeling of diplomatic warmth from Brussels was compounded by the EU’s unusual reluctance to back the extension for the United Nations investigative commission into human rights violations during the war.

The UN Human Rights Council, headquartered in Geneva, recently found itself at odds when it failed to extend the tenure of the International Commission of Human Rights Experts on Ethiopia. Chaired by the esteemed Tanzanian lawyer and human rights advocate Mohamed Othman, this Commission had been tasked with investigating allegations of rights violations since the war’s commencement on November 3, 2020.

The Entebbe-based Commission has been vocal, releasing no less than 10 public statements in three years, including a recent comprehensive report. It accuses all warring parties of a plethora of crimes, ranging from mass killings and rape to the wanton destruction of educational and medical facilities. They have detained thousands unlawfully and displaced millions from their homes.

None of the parties in the conflict - bar Eritrean leaders - have dismissed these allegations off mark. The authorities in Addis Abeba, Meqelle, Bahir Dar and Semera acknowledge that forces under their command committed atrocities, albeit with variations in magnitude and detail. The consensus seems clear: for a deeply divided society like Ethiopia’s to move on, there must be accountability, reconciliation, and healing.

The thorny issue, though, is determining who will oversee these investigations and administer what is widely termed as “transitional justice.”

A working group, formulated in Addis Abeba and comprising experts from the Ministry of Justice, has been entrusted with chalking out a transitional justice policy. Yet, with the process exclusively under the federal government’s purview, scepticism abounds. This should be of no surprise.

Transitional justice should not be just retrospective but more about shaping the future. In a country rife with division like Ethiopia, it must serve as a gateway to forging a fair political community and an inclusive economic order. Countries that have successfully trodden this path stand as beacons of hope for others in the throes of strife and discord.

The need for an impartial and credible system to address human rights violations and promote reconciliation is vital.

Ethiopia remains scarred by unresolved historical conflicts. Prior attempts at promoting an inclusive and accountable system have been, for the most part, underwhelming. Efforts to bridge historical schisms and offer victims a platform for voicing their grievances often fell victim to the biases they sought to eradicate, perpetuating feelings of disenfranchisement.

In a successful transitional justice, impartiality is sacrosanct. Ensuring fairness and inclusivity for all stakeholders is crucial to focusing on truth, justice, and reparations, rather than pursuing the righteousness of the victor. For countries like Ethiopia, with a deeply rooted institutional distrust, the significance of a credible transitional justice system is immeasurable.

Transparency, consistency, and adherence to internationally acknowledged norms form the bedrock of credibility. Here, past international undertakings can serve as guiding stars.

Although not without critics, South Africa’s post-apartheid Truth & Reconciliation Commission (TRC) stands out as a testament to the power of confronting a divisive past. The Commission’s emphasis on truth, reconciliation, reparations, and conditional amnesty created a way for victims and perpetrators to address historical grievances.

Germany’s post-World War II transformation offers another instructive tale. A dogged resolve to reckon with its National Socialist Party (Nazi) past, through rigorous legal mechanisms and societal reflection, enabled Germany’s society to emerge from the shadows of its history.

While such international examples illuminate potential paths, the onus should be on Ethiopia’s leaders to initiate a political dialogue, aiming for a negotiated settlement of differences that led to the wars. A dialogue with the federal government the authorities in Tigray provisional administration have recently advocated, echoing a sentiment that has long been due, should deserve proper attention.

Ethiopia’s current societal fabric is fraught with entrenched demographic tensions, widespread mistrust in its institutions, and political degeneration. A recent UN Human Rights Commission statement added to these concerns. The Commission cautioned that rights violations are destined to persist without independent probes and an international oversight mechanism.

The report paints a bleak picture, highlighting the myriad risk factors for future crimes in Ethiopia, from ongoing violations and instability to deep-seated impunity. This dire prognosis can serve as a wake-up call for the international community, particularly those who once vowed “never again”.

Regrettably, geopolitics often trumps humanitarianism. Policymakers, primarily in Washington D.C. and Brussels, seem to have prioritised countering the rising challenge from assertive and illiberal countries over safeguarding human lives.

The Europeans, it seems, are willing to keep the Ethiopian state intact, potentially to curb refugee inflows, even if it means compromising their lofty human rights ideals. They appear to have come to terms with the derelictions of duty to protect those fallen victims in the name of state sovereignty.

It remains to be seen if Europe’s painful tradeoff on Ethiopia will pay off.

PUBLISHED ON Oct 07,2023 [ VOL 24 , NO 1223]

Share this...

Facebook

Pinterest

Twitter

Linkedin

Related Posts

Fortune News | Oct 23,2021

Inflation Rages in War Torn Tigray Region

View From Arada | Oct 15,2022

War Of The Chips And Shakespearian

Editorial | Dec 19,2020

When War Is Life, Peace Becomes Death

Fortune News | Aug 14,2021

Bankers Perplexed by War Contributions, Request Clarification

My Opinion | Jun 08,2024

Can National Dialogue Overcome Years of War, Diplomatic Missteps?

My Opinion | Sep 11,2020

Efficiency vs. Justice: The Economic Debate

Editorial | Aug 28,2021

Not Hoarding, War Exacerbates Inflation. Capping Prices Won't Do It

Fineline | Jul 13,2019

The war of words between TPLF and ADP

Commentaries | Jan 16,2021

Reconciliation: Underrated Element in the Transitional Justice Process of Ethiopia

Editorial | Sep 18,2021

Atomised, Partisan Peace Initiatives No Match for War Camp's Rhetoric

---