Sep 28 , 2019
By Nouriel Roubini ( Nouriel Roubini, a professor at NYU’s Stern School of Business and CEO of Roubini Macro Associates, was senior economist for international affairs in the White House’s Council of Economic Advisers during the Clinton Administration. He has worked for the International Monetary Fund, the US Federal Reserve and the World Bank. )
In the classic game of “chicken,” two drivers race directly toward each other, and the first to swerve is the “loser.” If neither swerves, both will probably die. In the past, such scenarios have been studied to assess the risks posed by great power rivalries. In the case of the Cuban missile crisis, for example, Soviet and American leaders were confronted with the choice of losing face or risking a catastrophic collision. The question, always, is whether a compromise can be found that spares both parties their lives and their credibility.
There are now several geo-economic games of chicken playing out. In each case, failure to compromise would lead to a collision, most likely followed by a global recession and financial crisis. The first and most important contest is between the United States and China over trade and technology. The second is the brewing dispute between the US and Iran. In Europe, there is the escalating brinkmanship between British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and the European Union over Brexit. Finally, there is Argentina, which could end up on a collision course with the International Monetary Fund after the likely victory of the Peronist Alberto Fernández in next month’s presidential election.
In the first case, a full-scale trade, currency, tech and cold war between the US and China would push the current downturn in manufacturing, trade and capital spending into services and private consumption, tipping the US and global economies into a severe recession. Similarly, a military conflict between the US and Iran would drive oil prices above 100 dollars per barrel, triggering stagflation (a recession with rising inflation). That, after all, is what happened in 1973 during the Yom Kippur War, in 1979 following the Iranian Revolution, and in 1990 after Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait.
A blowup over Brexit might not by itself cause a global recession, but it would certainly trigger a European one, which would then spill over to other economies. The conventional wisdom is that a “hard” Brexit would lead to a severe recession in the United Kingdom but not in Europe, because the UK is more reliant on trade with the EU than vice versa. This is naive. The Eurozone is already suffering a sharp slowdown and is in the grip of a manufacturing recession; and the Netherlands, Belgium, Ireland, and Germany – which is nearing a recession – do in fact rely heavily on the UK export market.
With Eurozone business confidence already depressed as a result of Sino-American trade tensions, a chaotic Brexit would be the last straw. Just imagine thousands of trucks and cars lining up to fill out new customs paperwork in Dover and Calais. Moreover, a European recession would have knock-on effects, undercutting growth globally and possibly triggering a risk-off episode. It could even lead to new currency wars, if the value of the euro and pound were to fall too sharply against other currencies (not least the US dollar).
A crisis in Argentina could also have global consequences. If Fernández defeats President Mauricio Macri and then scuttles the country’s 57-billion-dollar IMF programme, Argentina could suffer a repeat of its 2001 currency crisis and default. That could lead to capital flight from emerging markets more generally, possibly triggering crises in highly indebted Turkey, Venezuela, Pakistan and Lebanon, and further complicating matters for India, South Africa, China, Brazil, Mexico and Ecuador.
In all four scenarios, both sides want to save face. US President Donald Trump wants a deal with China, in order to stabilise the economy and markets before his re-election bid in 2020; Chinese President Xi Jinping also wants a deal to halt China’s slowdown. But neither wants to be the “chicken,” because that would undermine their domestic political standing and empower the other side. Still, without a deal by year’s end, a collision will become likely. As the clock ticks down, a bad outcome becomes more likely.
Similarly, Trump thought he could bully Iran by abandoning the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and imposing severe sanctions. But the Iranians have responded by escalating their regional provocations, knowing full well that Trump cannot afford a full-scale war and the oil-price spike that would result from it. Moreover, Iran does not want to enter negotiations that would give Trump a photo opportunity until some sanctions are lifted. With both sides reluctant to blink first – and with both Saudi Arabia and Israel egging on the Trump administration – the risk of an accident is rising.
Having perhaps been inspired by Trump, Johnson naively thought that he could use the threat of a hard Brexit to bully the EU into offering a better exit deal than what his predecessor had secured. But now that Parliament has passed legislation to prevent a hard Brexit, Johnson is playing two games of chicken at once. A compromise with the EU on the Irish “backstop” is still possible before the October 31 deadline, but the probability of a de facto hard-Brexit scenario is also increasing.
In Argentina, both sides are posturing. Fernández wants a clear electoral mandate and is campaigning on the message that Macri and the IMF are to blame for all the country’s problems. The IMF’s leverage is obvious: if it permanently withholds the next 5.4-billion-dollar tranche of funding and ends the bailout, Argentina will suffer another financial collapse. But Fernández has leverage, too, because a 57-billion-dollar debt is a problem for any creditor; the IMF’s ability to help other distressed economies would be constrained by an Argentinean collapse. As in the other cases, a face-saving compromise is better for all, but a collision and financial meltdown cannot be ruled out.
The problem is that while compromise requires both parties to de-escalate, the tactical logic of chicken rewards crazy behavior. If I can make it look like I have removed my steering wheel, the other side will have no choice but to swerve. But if both sides throw out their steering wheels, a collision becomes unavoidable.
The good news is that in the four scenarios above, each side is still talking to the other, or may be open to dialogue under some face-saving conditions. The bad news is that all sides are still very far from any kind of agreement. Worse, there are big egos in the mix, some of whom might prefer to crash than be perceived as a chicken. The future of the global economy thus hinges on four games of daring that could go either way.
PUBLISHED ON Sep 28,2019 [ VOL 20 , NO 1013]
Digital First | Mar 13,2020
Radar | Mar 13,2021
Viewpoints | Apr 25,2020
Radar | Feb 09,2019
Radar | Jun 25,2022
Fortune News | May 23,2020
Featured | Mar 07,2020
Commentaries | Aug 08,2020
Radar | May 15,2021
Photo Gallery | 60777 Views | May 06,2019
Photo Gallery | 52718 Views | Apr 26,2019
Fortune News | 49992 Views | Jul 18,2020
Fortune News | 49222 Views | Sep 01,2021
Commentaries | Dec 04,2022
Life Matters | Dec 04,2022
My Opinion | Dec 04,2022
Sunday with Eden | Dec 04,2022
Agenda | Dec 04,2022
Editorial | Dec 04,2022
Jul 2 , 2022 . By RUTH TAYE
On a rainy afternoon last week, a coffee processing facility in the capital's Akaki-Qality District was abuzz with activ...
Nov 27 , 2021
Against my will, I have witnessed the most terrible defeat of reason and the most sa...
Nov 13 , 2021
Plans and reality do not always gel. They rarely do in a fast-moving world. Every act...
Oct 16 , 2021 . By HAWI DADHI
Residing in a country with no capital market, an organised marketplace for trading se...
Leaders of the National Election Board are in a charm offensive mood, of a sort. Last week, they organised a rare tour for members of the me...
When the country's most senior diplomats and envoys return back to their posts after two-week debriefings, they leave behind a point or two...
Dec 4 , 2022
Last week saw enraged university lecturers' threatening to stage a strike. They addre...
Nov 26 , 2022
In the wake of the liberalization of the telecom sector, Ethiopian authorities have m...
Nov 19 , 2022
The rounds of talks to end wars in Ethiopia held in Pretoria, South Africa, and Nairo...
Nov 12 , 2022
Two weeks have passed since negotiators from Ethiopia's federal government and the TP...
What are the odds of seeing a housemaid who loves the job dearly and wakes up every morning to do the chores with excitement? Well, this...
Dec 3 , 2022
The nostalgia for the combustible engine, with the noise and smell of burned fossil f...
Dec 4 , 2022 . By MUNIR SHEMSU
A self-proclaimed industrial park alias "Hawassa Textile & Industrial Park" canno...
Awash Bank shareholders voted to boost the paid-up capital to 55 billion Br in the ne...
Dec 4 , 2022 . By RAHEL BOGALE
The expansion project under the country's largest referral hospital runs aground due...
Or see contact page