
Editorial | Mar 28,2020
Dec 19 , 2018
By
The sharpest differences of opinion can be over how conflicts can be managed. Everyone has an opinion about it, and it is tough to avoid. There is conflict in every choice that is made since every option has consequences.
Choosing which graduate school to attend or what field of study to peruse does not have much consequence on people beyond those that a person is directly associated with. But choosing where resources should be allocated is something wholly different. Such decisions have consequences, and the allocations of these resources to different segments of the public substantially elevate the probability for conflicts.
If indeed, Ethiopia continues along the path of multiparty democracy - toward which various reforms have taken place - the nation would be choosing to manage its socio-economic and political conflicts in a manner it has never done before.
Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s (PhD) meeting with Patrick Gaspard, president of the Open Society Foundation, an international institution founded by the most famous liberal billionaire, George Soros, is one of several indicators that the incumbents are trying to take the plunge into multipartyism.
Indeed, that by itself will not get the Prime Minister any points. Only institutional and policy reforms have meanings. But it is inspiring to see that the nation is not shying away from the support it can get. This does not mean that the incumbents should wag their tail for every international institution or Western government that comes along with new ideas. But it is important that they are in good company.
It is a company that former administrations have kept, but whose views they have actually spurned. Pluralism has not been popular in Ethiopia, where subsequent governments have shown skepticism of its influences. And whatever their ulterior motives may have been, their most popular and persistent arguments against it have been that conflict will run rampant under pluralism.
Indeed, unattended conflict brings chaos. But the solution cannot be avoiding conflict altogether, since there has never been any historical episode where that has happened. And as far as human studies are concerned, it would be unproductive to do away with conflict anyways. For without conflict, which in its most basic concept refers to a difference of opinions, there will not be any intellectual or moral development. The human drive to know the unknown may well be stunted.
But the issue remains that conflict, for all its benefits, is dangerous. When it exists in a country without strong institutions and an informed public, managing it would be tantamount to mediating a dogfight.
Creating barriers that restrict freedom of assembly and free speech are effective means of nipping conflicts in the bud. It is also the easiest means to snuff out conflicts, which is perhaps why many governments prefer to opt for it. Conflict threatens to crack open the safe and cozy world to which we all ascribe, which is probably why individuals give into racist ideologies or group think.
Compromises have their complications, because they force us to find alternatives and to rise above the either-or dichotomy that we easily fall into. For we often believe that otherwise, everything will fall apart. But this is not true, and should not be how we approach conflicts that inevitably arise in any country over virtually any issue.
The compromise would be to understand that while conflict can lead to chaos, eliminating it altogether would halt progress. It will also allow discussions that need to come out into the open to fester under the surface until a point of no return is reached.
Multiparty democracy is not perfect. If there is anything to be said about the world’s oldest democracies, it is that it is a work in progress. But it is best suited to manage conflicts by reducing its worst outcomes and enhancing its best effects.
It is a compromise toward the centre that attempts to apply the best inputs from all extremes and shakes off the worst instincts of those at the sharp ends. It is the only system that has been known to bring a balance.
PUBLISHED ON
Dec 19,2018 [ VOL
19 , NO
973]
Editorial | Mar 28,2020
Fortune News | Dec 19,2020
Verbatim | Nov 21,2020
Sunday with Eden | Sep 17,2022
Fortune News | Dec 05,2020
Agenda | Nov 06,2021
Sponsored Contents | Oct 25,2021
Addis Fortune | Nov 04,2020
Agenda | Nov 13,2021
Radar | Aug 28,2021
Photo Gallery | 64391 Views | May 06,2019
Photo Gallery | 56246 Views | Apr 26,2019
Fortune News | 51047 Views | Jul 18,2020
Fortune News | 50649 Views | Sep 01,2021
Dec 24 , 2022
Biniam Mikru heads the department of cabinet affairs under Mayor Adanech Abiebie. But...
Jul 2 , 2022 . By RUTH TAYE
On a rainy afternoon last week, a coffee processing facility in the capital's Akaki-Qality District was abuzz with activ...
Nov 27 , 2021
Against my will, I have witnessed the most terrible defeat of reason and the most sa...
Nov 13 , 2021
Plans and reality do not always gel. They rarely do in a fast-moving world. Every act...
Jan 28 , 2023
It is not common to see an appointment for a senior federal government office stir de...
Jan 21 , 2023
Eyob Tekalign, state minister for Finance, took to social media platforms last week t...
Jan 14 , 2023
The longing for normalcy and a semblance of individual and collective security in Eth...
Jan 7 , 2023
The hallmark of Ethiopia's contemporary leaders could be a fascination with grandeur...
Jan 28 , 2023
In what has become common in the past four years, a new round of nominations was put before Parliament last week. These nominations by the P...
Jan 28 , 2023 . By BERSABEH GEBRE
Aklilu Wubet of Wegagen Bank and his executives had a lot to celebrate when they met rather anxious share...
The Oromia Public Enterprise is edging closer to bagging Ayka Addis Textile Factory for 1.82 billion Br....
Jan 28 , 2023 . By EMMANUEL JORGE
Last week saw an uncharacteristically polemical moment after parliamentarians questioned three nominees o...