Photo Gallery | 191154 Views | May 06,2019
Jul 4 , 2026. By Kidist Yidnekachew ( Kidist Yidnekachew is interested in art, human nature and behaviour. She has studied psychology, journalism and communications and can be reached at (kaymina21@gmail.com) )
Sibling rivalry is often blamed on unequal treatment, though the real source may be more complex. Parents rarely love one child more than another, but they may naturally connect more easily with certain personalities. Children recognise those subtle differences with remarkable accuracy. Material equality cannot always compensate for emotional perception. Accepting this human reality may foster healthier family relationships.
There is a familiar and exhausting mathematics to raising more than one child. It is the daily calculation of making sure the juice reaches the exact same level in every cup, birthday gifts cost roughly the same amount, and praise is handed out with careful precision.
For parents trying to keep the peace between a six-year-old and a five-year-old, this pursuit of perfect fairness often feels like a full-time job. Every decision is measured against the possibility of hearing the dreaded words, “That’s not fair.” Keeping the scales balanced becomes less about preference and more about survival.
Yet beneath the identical toys and evenly divided slices of cake lies a truth that many parents quietly wrestle with and many children instinctively sense. Absolute equality in parental affection rarely exists. Even if the difference is only an inch, a favourite often emerges.
Children seem to possess an extraordinary ability to detect these subtle emotional shifts. Long before they can explain what they are feeling, they notice the slight change in a parent's tone, how quickly patience wears thin with one sibling compared to another, or the effortless warmth that greets a particular child. When a child quietly says, “You love them more than me,” the words strike far deeper than most parents expect.
For a parent who genuinely loves every child with fierce devotion, that accusation can be heartbreaking. It challenges the image of being completely fair and forces parents to confront something deeply uncomfortable. The guilt rarely comes from loving one child less. It comes from recognising that children can sometimes see the small human biases parents work so hard to conceal, even from themselves.
Understanding this requires looking beyond the idea of unconditional love and considering the psychology behind human relationships.
Developmental psychologists describe a concept known as "goodness of fit", the degree to which a person's temperament matches the environment and the people around them. Parents are not neutral observers. They have their own personalities, emotional triggers and ways of communicating. Naturally, some children fit more comfortably with those traits than others.
Having a favourite does not necessarily mean loving one child more than another. More often, it reflects a natural ease with a particular personality. A quiet and reflective mother may find herself relaxing more easily with an equally calm daughter, while needing far more energy to manage an energetic son. Likewise, a parent who enjoys humour may unconsciously brighten whenever their witty child walks into the room.
This is where that extra inch of favouritism quietly exists. It rarely appears in the distribution of money or material things. Instead, it reveals itself through the smallest moments of everyday life.
Children are remarkably observant. They do not simply count presents or compare the size of birthday cakes. They notice how long a parent maintains eye contact, the difference between a genuine laugh and a patient sigh, whose mistakes are excused as tiredness and whose are treated as deliberate misbehaviour.
These quiet differences create an invisible tension within families. For the child who feels just outside that circle of emotional ease, identical gifts offer little comfort. Material fairness can begin to feel like an attempt to compensate for something less tangible. The rivalry that develops is often not about who received the better toy. It is about who receives the more relaxed, affectionate and unguarded version of the same parent.
This kind of unfairness is difficult to prove because it leaves no physical evidence. When children complain, parents can point to the matching presents, equal allowances or identical privileges as proof that everyone is treated the same. Yet those visible signs of fairness do not always answer what children are actually feeling.
Recognising this does not make someone a bad parent. It simply acknowledges that parents are human. Love may be unconditional, but enjoying another person's company is shaped by personality, circumstance and temperament. Those connections change as children grow, develop new interests and move through different stages of life. Parents change as well.
Perhaps the healthiest approach is not to insist that every emotional scale is perfectly balanced. A parent's commitment to each child can remain equal even when human connection is not. Accepting that reality may help parents respond with greater honesty when a child says something feels unfair, instead of simply pointing to two identical cups of juice.
PUBLISHED ON
Jul 04,2026 [ VOL
27 , NO
1366]
Photo Gallery | 191154 Views | May 06,2019
Photo Gallery | 180954 Views | Apr 26,2019
Photo Gallery | 177615 Views | Oct 06,2021
My Opinion | 143247 Views | Aug 14,2021
Jul 11 , 2026
At a market stall, reform arrives without a communique. It comes as a higher transpor...
Jul 4 , 2026
In the goldfields of the Benishangul-Gumuz Regional State, Ethiopia's balance-of-paym...
Jun 27 , 2026
The federal legislative house rushed through one of the country's most contentious ho...
When Parliament takes up the appropriation bill, federal legislators will receive a d...