Making Climate Finance Affordable

Mar 16 , 2024
By Rebecca Ray , Ulrich Volz

Emerging economies are on the front lines of climate change, yet they face a 2.4 trillion dollar annual bill to meet their climate goals. With over half already at high risk of debt distress, their challenge borders existential threat. The world must rally to provide targeted debt relief and innovative financing solutions, argue Rebecca Ray, a senior academic researcher at the Boston University Global Development Policy Center, and Ulrich Volz, a professor of economics and Director of the Centre for Sustainable Finance at SOAS, University of London, in this commentary provided by Project Syndicate (PS).

Emerging-market and developing economies (EMDEs) will need an estimated 2.4 trillion dollars in climate investment annually to meet climate goals, according to the Independent High-Level Expert Group on Climate Finance. One trillion dollars would have to come from external sources. Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) will require even more financing: an annual increase of 3.5 trillion dollars in new investments by 2030. These are daunting figures. But they are also non-negotiable.

Raising trillions of dollars in new external finance would be difficult at the best of times. It is even trickier when the world is facing an escalating debt crisis. After examining newly available data on 108 EMDEs, the Boston University Global Development Policy Center found that more than half – 62 countries – are already at high risk of debt distress. An additional 33 countries are severely constrained in their ability to access capital markets, owing largely to poor economic growth prospects following the COVID-19 pandemic, advanced-economy interest-rate hikes, and below-investment-grade bond ratings.

The vast majority of EMDEs are thus facing debt distress or prohibitively high borrowing costs. However, these are precisely the countries that most need financing to meet climate and development goals. Of these 95 countries, 83 have higher needs for investment in climate-change mitigation (lowering emissions) or adaptation (building resilience against extreme weather events) than the typical (median) country.

And 73 of them have more potential to expand their national protected areas, either on land or in their coastal waters, than the typical country.

A fundamental problem is that investments in protecting nature do not necessarily boost short-term economic growth. Instead, they build long-term resilience – including a greater ability to withstand extreme weather events like hurricanes and droughts – thereby making future crises less likely. This includes future debt crises: climate vulnerability and nature loss can undermine debt sustainability, and climate change increases sovereign risk and the cost of capital.

To break the cycle of environmental and economic crises, and move toward a new cycle of sustainable growth, countries must invest now. Any strategy for addressing climate change and delivering on the SDGs must include measures to lower barriers to new finance, including targeted debt relief and more creative financing arrangements.

Debt relief is unavoidable. An ambitious debt-relief initiative akin to the Highly Indebted Poor Countries Initiative (HIPCI), which the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank established in 1996, should be created to provide meaningful debt relief for the dozens of countries facing full-blown sovereign debt crisis.

For this to work, all creditors must actively participate. To understand why, consider that at least half of the total external sovereign debt stock in 27 debt-distressed countries – many low-income countries or small island developing states – is owed to multilateral creditors. Even if all bilateral and private debt were cancelled, some of the world's most vulnerable countries would remain weighed down by debt.

Major creditors must also take steps to reduce the cost of capital for certain types of investments, such as those that advance climate goals. Many proposals have already been put forward. For example, Sustainable Future Bonds may allow longer repayment terms and lower interest rates, making them better suited for investments with longer-term payouts. Multilateral development banks (MDBs) also have an important role to play in providing EMDEs with easier access to capital. They can raise the threshold for countries to access concessional lending, pursue capital increases that support higher lending, and work with governments and the private sector to reduce and share risks.

Making financing for climate action and conservation affordable is among the world's most urgent challenges. The solution is clear: a combination of targeted debt relief, credit enhancements, and MDB reform. But so far, there has been a lack of will to implement it. If this does not change soon, we will learn firsthand that the costs of inaction far outweigh the costs of prevention.

PUBLISHED ON Mar 16,2024 [ VOL 24 , NO 1246]

By Rebecca Ray ( Rebecca Ray is a senior academic researcher at the Boston University Global Development Policy Center. ) , Ulrich Volz ( Ulrich Volz, professor of economics and director of the Centre for Sustainable Finance at SOAS, University of London, )

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Put your comments here

N.B: A submit button will appear once you fill out all the required fields.

Editors' Pick


Fortune news