
Radar | Apr 17,2020
Dec 7 , 2024
By Liana Schalatek
So far this year, floods, heat waves, droughts, storms, and wildfires have led to thousands of deaths, threatened the health and livelihoods of millions of people, and caused tens of billions of dollars in damage – at least 41 billion dollars by June. In September and October, two hurricanes – Helene and Milton – cost the United States (US) alone over 100 billion dollars. Recent research suggests climate damage could cost the global economy between 19 trillion dollars and 59 trillion dollars annually by 2049.
The message is clear. Mobilising large amounts of climate finance today is essential to safeguard our future.
Of course, not everyone bears the same responsibility for the climate crisis. The fundamental injustice of climate change is that the countries that have contributed the least to the problem often suffer its worst effects. In recognition of this, the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement stipulated that developed economies should provide financial resources to support developing countries' mitigation and adaptation efforts.
However, the world's high-income countries dedicate only about 100 billion dollars annually in public finance to support climate efforts in developing economies. Even this relatively low number is a recent development. Though the commitment was made in 2009, it was fulfilled for the first time only in 2022, two years after the target date. Making matters worse, much of the support has come in the form of loans, including non-concessional financing. The good news was that countries agreed on an updated spending target - the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) on climate finance - at this year's United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP29) in Baku, Azerbaijan.
Unfortunately, however, despite nearly three years of technical and political deliberations, involving thousands of pages of formal submissions, academic studies, and advocacy papers, the necessary scale of the Goal remains highly contested.
According to the Paris Agreement, the Goal will significantly shape the next round of climate-action plans – nationally determined contributions (NDCs) – which countries will submit early next year. If the Goal is insufficient, countries cannot do what is necessary to close the global emissions and adaptation gaps. A subset of the existing developing countries' NDCs will cost an estimated five trillion to 6.8 trillion dollars by 2030.
But, mitigation and adaptation are only part of the challenge. Developing economies also face escalating loss and damage – not only from extreme weather, but also from slow-onset events, such as melting glaciers, desertification, and sea-level rise – which could cost them 447 billion to 894 billion dollars by 2030. Failure to agree on a sufficiently robust NCQG, including finance to address loss and damage, would weaken an international climate regime that is supposed to emphasise solidarity and fairness.
That does not seem to matter to developed countries, led by the United States. They have explicitly rejected any obligation to compensate developing countries for climate-change-related loss and damage. And the stage is set for them to get away with shirking their responsibility. Though loss and damage was given its own article in the Paris Agreement (separate from adaptation), it was intentionally left out of the financing commitments under the pact.
Rich countries can claim this issue is already covered by the designated Loss & Damage Fund (FRLD) created last year at COP28. But this claim is disingenuous, and a closer look at the FRLD's terms reveals why. All financial contributions are to be entirely voluntary. This funding is "based on cooperation and facilitation," and does "not involve liability or compensation." The US obliterated the distinction between rich and poor countries as the basis for contributions to the Fund, with implications for collective action under the international climate regime and the Paris Agreement.
Unlike the 2010 Green Climate Fund charter, the FRLD text never names developed countries as the ones providing the financial support. It should not be surprising that FRLD pledges a total of 702 million dollars one year in, with few additional pledges expected in Baku. This includes a paltry 17.5 million dollars commitment from the US, the country that has emitted by far the most greenhouse gases historically. That figure is orders of magnitude smaller than America's "fair share" contribution, which, according to one calculation, would amount to 340 billion dollars annually (for both adaptation and loss-and-damage support).
The FRLD, hailed as a triumph for climate justice a year ago, might turn out to be a Pyrrhic victory. Not only does it fail to deliver the support developing economies need to cope with climate-related loss and damage, but it also provides an excuse not to include such support in the NCQG. It could even set the stage for other kinds of climate-finance contributions to be made voluntarily for the foreseeable future.
Developing-country governments and civil society representatives should pressure rich countries to deliver a meaningful NCQG obliging developed countries to provide climate finance, even if it invites others to do so voluntarily. Developed-country governments will be judged harshly in the court of public opinion unless they rethink their callous approach to climate finance negotiations and deliver adequate resources to developing countries suffering from a climate crisis they did not cause.
PUBLISHED ON
Dec 07,2024 [ VOL
25 , NO
1284]
Radar | Apr 17,2020
Fortune News | Jun 13,2025
Fortune News | Jul 25,2020
Fortune News | Nov 27,2022
Fortune News | May 17,2025
Radar | Mar 20,2021
Agenda | Oct 12,2019
View From Arada | Nov 26,2022
Radar | May 09,2020
Fortune News | Oct 01,2022
My Opinion | 131466 Views | Aug 14,2021
My Opinion | 127821 Views | Aug 21,2021
My Opinion | 125800 Views | Sep 10,2021
My Opinion | 123434 Views | Aug 07,2021
Dec 22 , 2024 . By TIZITA SHEWAFERAW
Charged with transforming colossal state-owned enterprises into modern and competitiv...
Aug 18 , 2024 . By AKSAH ITALO
Although predictable Yonas Zerihun's job in the ride-hailing service is not immune to...
Jul 28 , 2024 . By TIZITA SHEWAFERAW
Unhabitual, perhaps too many, Samuel Gebreyohannes, 38, used to occasionally enjoy a couple of beers at breakfast. However, he recently swit...
Jul 13 , 2024 . By AKSAH ITALO
Investors who rely on tractors, trucks, and field vehicles for commuting, transporting commodities, and f...
Jun 28 , 2025
Meseret Damtie, the assertive auditor general, has never been shy about naming names...
Jun 21 , 2025
A well-worn adage says, “Budget is not destiny, but it is direction.” Examining t...
Jun 14 , 2025
Yet again, the Horn of Africa is bracing for trouble. A region already frayed by wars...
Jun 7 , 2025
Few promises shine brighter in Addis Abeba than the pledge of a roof for every family...
Jun 29 , 2025
Addis Abeba's first rains have coincided with a sweeping rise in private school tuition, prompting the city's education...
Jun 29 , 2025 . By BEZAWIT HULUAGER
Central Bank Governor Mamo Mihretu claimed a bold reconfiguration of monetary policy...
Jun 29 , 2025 . By BEZAWIT HULUAGER
The federal government is betting on a sweeping overhaul of the driver licensing regi...
Jun 29 , 2025 . By NAHOM AYELE
Gadaa Bank has listed 1.2 million shares on the Ethiopian Securities Exchange (ESX),...