End the Tyranny of Rote Learning


Oct 16 , 2021
By Christian Tesfaye


It is no secret that Ethiopia's higher learning institutions are not terribly concerned with preparing their students for the labour market. Too much premium is placed upon ensuring that the number of undergrads and graduates increases, and voila! Suddenly the student is expected to become a real-world problem solver.

Part of the problem with this is that the real world is several levels removed from the noise-free, straightforward realm of theory. Take microeconomics, which is founded upon the concept of demand and supply. Both producers and consumers are supposed to gradually maximise their utility by reaching an equilibrium point where a good or service is sold for an ideal price that makes both parties happy.



This is all good and well. The mathematics on this is perfect. In the real world, however, its application is minimal. Information does not reach everybody equally (information asymmetry), costs to society are not equally shared (externalities) and markets often are distorted by a few players unless regulators are involved (monopolistic behaviour). In the end, consumers are worse off.

Of course, microeconomics admits this. It refers to them as market failures. But the higher learning institutions where this field is thought spend a minimal amount of time helping students understand how real-world business works. One significant way they do this is by burdening their students with exams that require rote learning.

The problem with rote learning is that there is not much use for it in a world where everyone has information at their fingerprints. Nearly everything that exists in academic textbooks could also be uncovered through the Google search engine. Anyone with a good conceptual understanding of the subject matter could tackle any real-world problem using tools that could be found on the internet, especially in the age of open-source movements.

Rote learning is even more unnecessary when automation is taking over tasks that are merely repetitious and bulky. It is much more helpful to learn how to use programming languages and develop the habit of updating oneself on a chosen field instead of attempting to memorise the totality of formulas and exact definitions.

The rigidity of Ethiopia’s higher learning institutions is all the more harmful given that the workplace demands skills that are rarely referenced in academic textbooks. Soft skills such as emotional intelligence, formal communication and how to utilise interdisciplinary learning are disregarded, the latter of which is critical to problem-solving.

The next generation of entrepreneurs, innovators, business leaders and policymakers would be better served with open book exams. They would have the textbooks in front of them, and they would be asked to solve problems as they would be doing in the real world. The depth and breadth of their knowledge about the subject matter would be tested, as well as their ability to understand and adapt to challenges as they come. They would also improve their skills in developing real-life applications for the theories they have been taught in class instead of struggling to memorise what, say, the “nth” article of the “n” chapter in the Ethiopian Commercial Code says.



Part of the problem is that an excess of college professors are lazy in crafting real-world examples of problems for their students that would challenge them during exams. They rather merely ask to explain this or that, or work out an exercise they have previously taught in class but with some numbers substituted.

The scarcity of professionals with advanced problem-solving skills is one primary reason Ethiopia plays virtually no role in the knowledge production endeavour of the human species. With the way we continue to insist that students memorise every textbook out there, we will ensure that this continues to be the case.



PUBLISHED ON Oct 16,2021 [ VOL 22 , NO 1120]



Christian Tesfaye (christian.tesfaye@addisfortune.net) is a researcher and Fortune's Deputy Editor-in-Chief whose interests run amok in the directions of political thought, markets, society and pop culture.






Editors' Pick




Editorial




Fortune news


Back
WhatsApp
Telegram
Email