Featured | Sep 09,2019
Oct 12 , 2024
By Ian Bremmer , Marietje Schaake
Multilateralism has fallen on hard times lately, especially at the United Nations (US). Its foundational commitments to peace, security, and cooperation feel very foreign at a time when multiple wars are raging, protectionism is on the rise, and the world is splitting into rival blocs.
The UN Security Council could not stop Russia's invasion of Ukraine, ceasefires in Gaza and Lebanon remain elusive, and subsequent COP summits have failed to spur enough concrete action to meet global climate targets. Not only are the UN's own Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) off-track, but in many cases, progress toward meeting them has reversed.
Despite this geopolitical recession, global cooperation is still possible. The General Assembly's first Summit of the Future in September this year tested the organisation's ability to tackle one of the world's biggest transnational challenges: artificial intelligence (AI). Surprising as it may be, the UN passed.
It is no exaggeration to say that AI has spurred one of the fastest and most robust policy responses in living memory. Barely a year ago, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres invited representatives from government, the private sector, and civil society to recommend how the world might govern AI in the service of humanity. He knew that the world's ambition to govern AI could fall flat, much like the initial response to climate change. The existing approaches were already too fragmented, and most left out the Global South, with 118 countries party to no AI governance framework.
Together, we served as rapporteurs for the Secretary General's High-Level Advisory Body on AI, which was established to meet this worthy challenge. Reflecting the world's diversity, its 39 members came from every continent, and included representatives from government, academia, civil society, and the technology industry.
This was the first genuinely global effort to govern AI. We are pleased that several of our recommendations were taken up in the Global Digital Compact, a comprehensive governance framework that UN member states adopted last month. Reaching this new agreement required overcoming the very real differences that separate the United States, China, Europe, and the Global South, as well as governments and the private sector (especially technology companies).
For example, one of our recommendations, which has been approved in principle for implementation, is establishing an international scientific panel on AI. We started from the premise that to govern an issue as complex as AI, we should have a common understanding of the technology and its potential risks and effects across countries and cultures. We learned this lesson the hard way from climate change. While many now debate "how" to address the climate crisis, there is no serious debate over "whether" we should address it; the evidence provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is overwhelming.
A similar intergovernmental panel on AI would undertake the difficult but fundamental work of analysing the ongoing developments in AI technology, thereby giving policymakers a factual, independent foundation to inform debates, goals, and policy decisions.
But what we are most enthusiastic about is the prospect of ensuring that AI benefits everyone. Unlike climate change, where there are zero-sum politics and serious short-term trade-offs between lowering emissions, fostering economic growth, and achieving equity (with powerful vested interests that oppose a post-carbon transition), AI is the rare transnational issue with positive-sum solutions. AI should not pose an existential threat to incumbent governments and companies if shared safely and made to respect international law and fundamental freedoms. Instead, it should catalyse win-win opportunities.
There is tremendous demand for technologies like AI and excitement over their potential to help us meet all sorts of objectives, including those enshrined in the SDGs. AI can be a game-changing technology, from public health and education to economic growth and climate mitigation. But, without the infrastructure and mechanisms to oversee its transformative growth, it could drive further global divergence, with the poorest and most vulnerable populations once again being left behind. We are determined to prevent that.
Besides forming a shared knowledge base, we have recommended initiatives that enhance all countries' and communities' access to AI. From talent and standards to data and funding, the UN and its partners can help address gaps in resources and infrastructure to ensure that no one is left behind from the AI revolution.
Of course, some question the UN's role in governing AI, and governance must also take place at the nation-state level. Companies developing AI models are also creating standards. But like the internet before it, AI's potential makes it a global public good (as is AI safety). The UN is the only genuinely global body with the legitimacy to convene the world's governments and AI stakeholders, and the ability to guarantee any resulting agreements. That starts with getting the world on the same page – not to compel governance, but to align around the nature and scale of the opportunity and challenges.
With the right vision, tools, and political leadership, we can deploy the resources to ensure that AI lives up to its promise.
From climate change and public health to nuclear proliferation, the world has turned to the UN to solve its most complex problems. Armed conflict, humanitarian disasters, environmental crises, and economic woes highlight the international community's frequent failure to rise to the challenges the world faces. But as we grapple with our most revolutionary and potentially disruptive technology yet, the Global Digital Compact proves that there is still hope for multilateralism in a geopolitically fragmented world..
PUBLISHED ON
Oct 12,2024 [ VOL
25 , NO
1276]
Featured | Sep 09,2019
Fortune News | Nov 18,2023
Viewpoints | Jun 04,2022
Viewpoints | Jun 17,2023
Commentaries | Nov 26,2022
Featured | Jan 05,2019
Commentaries | Mar 30,2024
Viewpoints | Oct 28,2023
Viewpoints | Jan 27,2024
Viewpoints | Jul 23,2022
My Opinion | 111679 Views | Aug 14,2021
My Opinion | 108014 Views | Aug 21,2021
My Opinion | 106700 Views | Sep 10,2021
My Opinion | 104763 Views | Aug 07,2021
Commentaries | Oct 12,2024
Aug 18 , 2024 . By AKSAH ITALO
Although predictable Yonas Zerihun's job in the ride-hailing service is not immune to...
Jul 13 , 2024 . By AKSAH ITALO
Investors who rely on tractors, trucks, and field vehicles for commuting, transportin...
Jul 13 , 2024 . By MUNIR SHEMSU
The cracks in Ethiopia's higher education system were laid bare during a synthesis re...
Jul 13 , 2024 . By AKSAH ITALO
Construction authorities have unveiled a price adjustment implementation manual for s...
Oct 12 , 2024
In his inaugural address on October 27, 2024, Taye Atseqesellasie, the fifth presiden...
Oct 5 , 2024
Not long ago, the sight of exchange bureaus in Addis Abeba was as rare as a cloudless...
Sep 28 , 2024
In the early 2010s, Ethiopian authorities found themselves at odds with the Internati...
Sep 21 , 2024
A nurse in Addis Abeba shares a cramped one-room apartment with three colleagues. Her...
Oct 13 , 2024
A new directive by the Central Bank requiring coffee exporters to convert half of the...
Oct 13 , 2024 . By AKSAH ITALO
The National Bank of Ethiopia (NBE) is heightening its regulatory oversight of microf...
Oct 13 , 2024 . By BEZAWIT HULUAGER
Despite a substantial boost in budget and import volumes, farmers may contend with fe...
Fuel prices have spiked, exacerbated by global supply disruptions and a weakening Bir...