
Editorial | Dec 19,2018
Jun 24 , 2023
By Dambisa Moyo
In April, Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai predicted that artificial intelligence (AI) would have an impact "more profound" than any other human innovation, from fire to electricity. While it is impossible to know precisely what that impact will be, two changes appear particularly likely: demand for labour will fall, and productivity will rise. In other words, we appear to be moving toward a labour-less economic model in which fewer human workers are needed to sustain growth.
Back-office support, legal services, and accountancy jobs seem to face the most immediate risk from new generative AI technologies, including large language models like ChatGPT-4. But every sector of the economy is likely to be affected. Because language tasks account for 62pc of employees' time, a recent report by Accenture notes, large language models could affect 40pc of all working hours. Accenture estimates that 65pc of the time spent on these language tasks can be "transformed into more productive activity through augmentation and automation."
And a new McKinsey report predicts that the AI-driven productivity boost could add the equivalent of 2.6 trillion to 4.4 trillion dollars in value to the global economy annually.
But, even as higher productivity boosts economic growth, the diminution of labour would undermine it, meaning that growth could stagnate. Reduced demand for human workers implies a steep rise in unemployment, especially since the world population is set to continue growing.
Unemployment is already a persistent problem. According to the International Labor Organization (ILO), the total number of unemployed young people (15-24 years old) has remained around 70 million for over two decades. And the global youth unemployment rate has been trending up, from 12.2pc in 1995 to just under 13pc after the 2008 global financial crisis to 15.6pc in 2021.
AI will exacerbate these trends. And because AI's impact on labour markets is likely to be structural, the rise in unemployment would amount to a permanent dislocation. Structural unemployment could return to levels last seen in the deindustrialisation of the 1980s, when joblessness in the United Kingdom (UK), for example, remained above 10pc for the better part of the 1980s.
How can governments support GDP growth in a new era of persistent structural unemployment?
The most obvious likely response is a shift to greater redistribution, with governments raising taxes on the proceeds from AI-driven productivity gains and using those revenues to support the wider population, including by implementing some version of a universal basic income. To ensure adequate revenue to support expanded social safety nets, governments might move beyond taxing excess profits generated by AI-driven productivity gains to taxing the revenues of the firms reaping the biggest rewards. That way, the state – and, in turn, the general population – would claim a greater share of the AI windfall.
Of course, the AI revolution also has profound implications for businesses.
For starters, companies will have to adjust their strategies and operations to account for the combination of higher productivity and a smaller labour force, enabling them to generate more output with less capital. Companies that adjust as needed, and deliver low cost-to-income ratios, will attract investors; those that are slow to change their operating models will lose competitiveness and could fail.
The effects of such corporate adjustments will reverberate throughout the economy. Reduced demand for capital by firms will put downward pressure on the cost of capital, and companies will have less need to borrow from banks, causing overall activity in capital markets also to decline.
Higher taxes on corporate profits (or revenues) would create additional challenges. While the state will need to increase revenues to support the growing number of unemployed, this could leave corporations with lower retained earnings to reinvest, despite the additional profits generated by AI-driven productivity gains.
This is bad not only for the companies themselves. Lower investment in the economy would undermine growth, shrink the economic pie, and lower living standards. It would also narrow the tax base, erode the middle class, and widen inequality between the owners of capital and the traditional labour force.
While governments might want to raise taxes and redistribute the revenues to alleviate the short-term disruption caused by AI, they will need to think bigger in the long term. In fact, policymakers will have to rethink prevailing economic models and principles – beginning with the assumption that labour is a key engine of growth. In the age of AI, workers may do little to drive growth, but they must benefit from it.
This article was provided by Project Syndicate (PS).
PUBLISHED ON
Jun 24,2023 [ VOL
24 , NO
1208]
Editorial | Dec 19,2018
Viewpoints | Sep 08,2024
My Opinion | Nov 16,2019
Fortune News | Jul 15,2023
Commentaries | Jan 14,2023
Editorial | Dec 11,2020
Editorial | Jun 12,2021
Exclusive Interviews | Oct 30,2022
View From Arada | Nov 21,2020
My Opinion | Aug 26,2023
My Opinion | 128096 Views | Aug 14,2021
My Opinion | 124315 Views | Aug 21,2021
My Opinion | 122426 Views | Sep 10,2021
My Opinion | 120275 Views | Aug 07,2021
Dec 22 , 2024 . By TIZITA SHEWAFERAW
Charged with transforming colossal state-owned enterprises into modern and competitiv...
Aug 18 , 2024 . By AKSAH ITALO
Although predictable Yonas Zerihun's job in the ride-hailing service is not immune to...
Jul 28 , 2024 . By TIZITA SHEWAFERAW
Unhabitual, perhaps too many, Samuel Gebreyohannes, 38, used to occasionally enjoy a couple of beers at breakfast. However, he recently swit...
Jul 13 , 2024 . By AKSAH ITALO
Investors who rely on tractors, trucks, and field vehicles for commuting, transporting commodities, and f...
Apr 26 , 2025
Benjamin Franklin famously quipped that “nothing is certain but death and taxes....
Apr 20 , 2025
Mufariat Kamil, the minister of Labour & Skills, recently told Parliament that he...
Apr 13 , 2025
The federal government will soon require one year of national service from university...
Apr 6 , 2025
Last week, the International Finance Corporation (IFC), part of the World Bank Group...
Apr 28 , 2025 . By NAHOM AYELE
Key Takeaways: The Ministry of Justice's directive plans to enforce pro bono wor...
Apr 26 , 2025
Neway Magersa (Left), president of Sinqee Bank, shared a lighter moment at the Skylight Hotel on Africa Avenue and chuckled with Oromia Regi...
Apr 27 , 2025 . By BEZAWIT HULUAGER
A controversial decision to clear a large tract of land in Addis Abeba's Wereda 1, around Flamingo and th...
Apr 27 , 2025 . By AKSAH ITALO
Key Takeaways A federal court dismissed Zewdinesh Getahun's ownership claim as time-barred, requir...