News Analysis | Nov 20,2021
Jan 7 , 2024
By Simon Johnson
Democracies around the world face two major threats: a crisis of legitimacy and increasingly aggressive authoritarian regimes. What links both and makes them much more dangerous is the pernicious effect of dark money transfers, particularly those that pass through offshore tax havens and jurisdictions with excessive financial secrecy.
Restricting these tax havens and requiring more transparency on cross-border financial flows should become a major policy priority for all G7 countries in 2024.
The internal threat to democracy is an erosion of legitimacy. In industrial economies such as the United States (US) and Europe, new technologies, rising cross-border capital flows, and lower barriers to trade increased average productivity and created economic growth over the last half-century, but the benefits of this growth were not widely shared. Inequality within these countries has increased dramatically since the mid-1970s, with millions of people now feeling they have been left behind.
Support for democracy is undermined by the belief that the economic game is “rigged,” with people who are already powerful and privileged gaining the most – sometimes at the expense of the rest. While this belief may be exaggerated, it accords with the reality of tax evasion.
Tax havens allow rich people not only to build their wealth essentially tax free, but also to exercise economic and political power away from prying eyes and without any accountability. One list of tax havens includes among its top 10 both small Caribbean states and widely-respected countries such as British overseas territories (British Virgin Islands, Bermuda, and the Cayman Islands), the Netherlands, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Singapore, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
The US and the United Kingdom (UK) are also complicit. Their financial secrecy rules allow an extraordinary amount of foreign (and illicit) money to find shelter.
A multibillion-dollar industry has emerged, employing some of the world’s brightest lawyers, accountants, and consultants, focused on helping the wealthy and the unscrupulous. Tax havens are particularly useful for people with ill-begotten wealth derived from bribes, theft, and other forms of corruption. Being able to hide the identity of parties in any financial transaction is a key requirement to operating a successful haven.
This form of financial engineering corrupts democracy. Even worse, it exacerbates the second major threat we face: the strengthening of authoritarian regimes. Dark offshore money makes it easier to support candidates, manipulate public opinion, and persuade people to vote for a dictator.
The dark money of the Russian oligarchs has long been a mainstay of the country’s economy and political system. President Vladimir Putin’s close relationships with sources of dark money have been well documented.
Less widely appreciated is the way that non-transparent transactions have allowed the Chinese government to construct a vast global empire of influence. We are only now beginning to see how much low-income countries, especially in Africa, owe to various Chinese-backed entities. Relatedly, the Communist Party of China has reportedly “invested billions of dollars” in global disinformation around the world. This includes efforts focused on recent (and likely future) US elections.
It has also become painfully apparent that a large amount of money flows from Iran to organizations such as Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and the Houthi forces in Yemen that are now raining down missiles on commercial ships in the Red Sea. Almost all this Iranian funding moves through dark channels, including entities in Turkey and Yemen, according to US authorities.
Shutting down these channels would be difficult, but the most effective way to fight dark money – and its financing of authoritarianism, criminality, and terrorism – would be to clamp down on the dozens of tax havens that exist around the world. Doing so would strengthen tax collection in democracies and reduce the resources available to authoritarian regimes.
Ironically, several of these tax havens are at risk from climate change and are demanding international assistance to deal with potential sea-level rise and more damaging storms. If these island states and other jurisdictions wish to participate in fair and reasonable adjustment mechanisms (such as climate-related finance or debt relief), funded in part by the G7, they need to comply with increased transparency requirements.
One key element must be an extension of “know your customer (KYC)” rules to all these jurisdictions, backed up by appropriate criminal penalties. Specifically, there needs to be full disclosure to G7 tax authorities regarding who owns what assets and who makes which payments to whom.
Alas, some tax evasion is legal, owing solely to the lobbying power of the ultra-wealthy and powerful consultants and accountants, who will no doubt argue that productive businesses will move elsewhere if loopholes are closed. This should be countered with a simple principle that should be shared across the G7: business profits are taxed in proportion to where sales occur. For example, if one moves a headquarters (or ownership of intellectual property) to another country, one should still pay tax in the US based on business activities in the US.
The G7 agreement on a global minimum corporate tax was a step in the right direction here, but there is a lot more to be done.
In the age of artificial intelligence, we should expect many of the rich to become considerably richer. They will also presumably use AI tools to dodge taxes more effectively. Under current international arrangements, this will be easy to do. However, AI can also help uncover tax evasion and avoidance, as well as unusual money flows, which are often illicit. For tech barons who continuously talk about using AI for good, the challenge is to support the quick rollout of new AI-based tools for clamping down on tax evasion and tax havens.
PUBLISHED ON
Jan 07,2024 [ VOL
24 , NO
1236]
News Analysis | Nov 20,2021
Viewpoints | Apr 29,2023
Radar | Oct 24,2020
Commentaries | Nov 27,2018
Agenda | May 09,2020
Covid-19 | Mar 21,2020
My Opinion | Mar 25,2023
Fortune News | Dec 28,2019
Agenda | Dec 28,2019
Fortune News | Mar 25,2023
Photo Gallery | 98327 Views | May 06,2019
Photo Gallery | 90559 Views | Apr 26,2019
My Opinion | 71233 Views | Aug 14,2021
My Opinion | 67516 Views | Aug 21,2021
Commentaries | May 11,2024
Editorial | May 11,2024
Feb 24 , 2024 . By MUNIR SHEMSU
Abel Yeshitila, a real estate developer with a 12-year track record, finds himself unable to sell homes in his latest venture. Despite slash...
Feb 10 , 2024 . By MUNIR SHEMSU
In his last week's address to Parliament, Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed (PhD) painted a picture of an economy...
Jan 7 , 2024
In the realm of international finance and diplomacy, few cities hold the distinction that Addis Abeba doe...
Sep 30 , 2023 . By AKSAH ITALO
On a chilly morning outside Ke'Geberew Market, Yeshi Chane, a 35-year-old mother cradling her seven-month-old baby, stands amidst the throng...
May 11 , 2024
The ruling Prosperity Party - the Prosperitians - has its leaders turned to the Publi...
May 2 , 2024
For successive generations of Ethiopia's tax authorities, the chore of tax collection...
Apr 27 , 2024
The Prosperity Party (PP) - Prosperitians - is charting a course through treacherous...
Apr 20 , 2024
In a departure from its traditionally opaque practices, the National Bank of Ethiopia...
May 11 , 2024 . By BERSABEH GEBRE
Additional corridor-development plans embrace more weredas Officials of the Ad...
May 11 , 2024 . By BERSABEH GEBRE
Ethiopia's parliament established an 18-member think tank focused on addressing the construction industry woes. Under the leadership of...
Manufacturers of biscuits, noodles, and animal feed are sounding the alarm, urging policymakers to interv...
May 11 , 2024 . By AKSAH ITALO
Ethiopia is contested to fully embrace the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) due to slow progr...