If we all had mansions, adequate access to water and sanitation, constant power and internet connections and a government that could afford to subsidise paid leave for large swaths of the population, we would sail smoothly through the COVID-19 pandemic.

Unfortunately, most of the world is not this lucky. Ethiopia is the poster child for nations that cannot implement social distancing and public sanitation and hygiene policies at will. This is something that will be all the more evident as the number of cases inevitably rises, and containment becomes ever more critical.

Within just two weeks, the number of Coronavirus cases in Ethiopia has reached 12. It is not an escalation mirroring that of countries worst affected by the disease, at least not yet, but it is nothing to baulk at.

Commendably, the government is not sitting idly by. It has taken precautionary measures in its effort to curb the spread of the virus. The country’s borders have been closed off except for the transport of cargo, all passengers arriving in Ethiopia are being quarantined for 14 days and nightclubs and bars have been closed. Members of the civil service, except those considered essential, are also expected to work from home. It is a sort of paid leave, considering the lack of infrastructure or resources to ensure that they could continue to work from home.

These are aggressive as well as proactive measures that indeed need to be taken to escape the worst of the devastation of this disease. More importantly, these are the sort of measures overlooked by countries suffering from the worst effects of the pandemic – such as Italy and the United States - but were observed by Asian countries that were able to “flatten the curve.”

But while the measures the government is taking are necessary, they fail to consider the socioeconomic circumstances of the country. Many of the precautions are aimed at ensuring that social distancing and hygiene are observed. Self-isolation, telecommuting, washing hands and sanitizing surfaces, reduction of physical transactions and human contact are some of the methods and practices with which the spread of the virus can be beaten.

Many of these measures are costly and inconvenient - despite being crucial - even for developed countries such as the United States and European nations. For countries such as Ethiopia, they mostly do not even sound possible. This is because of the vast differences in socioeconomic circumstances between rich nations and countries such as Ethiopia.

In Ethiopia, households are often large. There is a high level of social mixing; inadequate access to water and sanitation; and a lack of adequate access to power and internet connections for telecommuting. It would be impractical to put in place policies aimed at enforcing social distancing and hygiene when neither the infrastructure (social or economic), the experience, nor the resources are there to support such a transformation.

In a deeply conservative country, how is it possible to limit gatherings in religious places and important social events, such as funerals? In a country where a third of the economy is informal, GDP per capita is below 1,000 dollars, and there is no fiscal space to subsidise large sections of the population being on paid leave, how can people stay at home?

"I earn eight dollars every day, and I have five people to feed. We will run out of food in a few days. I know the risk of Coronavirus, but I can't see my children hungry," said an Indian, in a dilemma we can appreciate, speaking to the BBC.