Radar | Jun 24,2023
Parliament, in a conspicuous departure from a historical penchant for infrastructural investments, has approved a federal budget of 801 billion Br, signalling a potential pivot in policy direction. The allocation earmarks 203 billion Br for capital expenditure and a modest uptick of 1.9pc from the previous year's total budget. Yet, with an inflation rate of 33pc, this implies a de facto significant drop in infrastructural expenditure.
With the trimmed capital spending, no new infrastructure projects are in the pipeline. This is a far cry from the 2022/23 fiscal year when the Parliament sanctioned a 786.6 billion Br budget, a substantial 40pc boost from the preceding year. Tax revenues are expected to bankroll a hefty 60pc of the budget, while domestic borrowing and a mix of foreign aid and non-tax revenues will cover the balance.
Arega Shumete (PhD), an economist and Ethiopian Economics Association member, sees this move not as an embrace of economic liberalisation but a worrying slide towards austerity. He asserted that advanced economies could afford lean capital expenditure budgets since their critical infrastructure is mostly in place—an advantage Ethiopia cannot claim. Despite the government's emphasis on the need to cut the budget deficit, the move has sparked scepticism and criticism, particularly for its inadequate allocation for infrastructure projects, such as roads.
Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed (PhD) insisted that Ethiopia's economy is growing at an impressive clip, boasting of the highest growth rate in East Africa this year—around 6.5pc. This claim, however, glosses over the crucial difference between nominal and real GDP growth rates. The authorities tend to report economic growth using nominal GDP rates, which are favourable but potentially misleading, given that they do not account for inflation or deflation when assessing economic development.
The debate over the new budget reached a fever pitch last week in a Parliament where the Prime Minister faced calls for his resignation—the second such call within a year. Leaders of the opposition party, the National Movement of Amhara (NAMA), questioned his administrative competence, calling his party's governance a "failed leadership". They cited the soaring inflation, instability, and burgeoning poverty as evidence of his administration's shortcomings.
You can read the full story here
PUBLISHED ON
Jul 08,2023 [ VOL
24 , NO
1210]
Radar | Jun 24,2023
Fortune News | Jun 17,2023
Editorial | Dec 09,2023
Editorial | Sep 16,2023
Editorial | Apr 10,2021
Editorial | Jul 08,2023
Radar | Aug 05,2023
Commentaries | Sep 03,2022
Fortune News | Jan 09,2021
Editorial | Mar 28,2020
Feb 24 , 2024 . By MUNIR SHEMSU
Abel Yeshitila, a real estate developer with a 12-year track record, finds himself unable to sell homes in his latest venture. Despite slash...
Feb 10 , 2024 . By MUNIR SHEMSU
In his last week's address to Parliament, Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed (PhD) painted a picture of an economy...
Jan 7 , 2024
In the realm of international finance and diplomacy, few cities hold the distinction that Addis Abeba doe...
Sep 30 , 2023 . By AKSAH ITALO
On a chilly morning outside Ke'Geberew Market, Yeshi Chane, a 35-year-old mother cradling her seven-month-old baby, stands amidst the throng...
May 11 , 2024
The ruling Prosperity Party - the Prosperitians - has its leaders turned to the Publi...
May 2 , 2024
For successive generations of Ethiopia's tax authorities, the chore of tax collection...
Apr 27 , 2024
The Prosperity Party (PP) - Prosperitians - is charting a course through treacherous...
Apr 20 , 2024
In a departure from its traditionally opaque practices, the National Bank of Ethiopia...
Loading your updates...