Standard Bank Backs Coca-Cola’s Expansion

The Coca-Cola Company, which recently invested 16 million Br to add a new production line that makes sugar-free, non-alcoholic malt drinks, secured 50 million dollars in financing from South Africa’s Standard Bank.

Standard Bank has arranged the financing facilities in support of the expansion strategy of the company in Ethiopia over the next five years. The Coca-Cola Beverages Africa (CCBA), a subsidiary of the Coca-Cola Company, has planned a 300-million-dollar expansion project in the country.

The new malt drink Novida Pineapple, which launched on February 6, 2020, at a ceremony held at Marriott Hotel, is part of the expansion project of the company. With the 300 million dollars, the company plans to build a plant in Hawassa city on five hectares of land and construct a factory in Sebeta among others.

Located inside the premises of the company in Lideta, the new production line has started bottling the new drink in a green bottle.

Based on the demand for the product, the drink could be bottled at the company’s Bahir Dar plant, according to Nigus Alemu, a legal counsel and director of public affairs and communications at Coca-Cola Beverages Africa.

The Coca-Cola Company has three operational plants in Addis Abeba, Bahir Dar and Dire Dawa. First established here six decades ago, the company has a production capacity of bottling over 70,000 bottles of soft drinks a day. It was established by Ethiopian Bottling Share Company, which later opened a second branch in Dire Dawa in 1965. Since its establishment, the company has created 2,100 direct and over 50,000 indirect jobs.

CCBA, which has over 16,000 employees in Africa with almost 40 bottling plants in 13 countries, established a representative office in Addis Abeba in 2015. East Africa Bottling S.C. has already invested 70 million dollars in the new plant.

The Coca-Cola Company holds a majority stake in CCBA, which is the largest bottler of Coca-Cola beverages in Africa – serving 13 countries on the continent – and the eighth largest in the world by revenue. CCBA began its operations as of July 2016 after a merger of the Coca-Cola Company, the then SABMiller and Gutsche Family Investments. The Coca-Cola Company owns a 66.5pc share of CCBA, while Gutsche Family holds the remaining.

“The CCBA deal holds significance as new foreign direct investment will be realised for Ethiopia, set to positively influence the country’s economic trajectory,” says Taitu Wondwosen, head of Ethiopia for Standard Bank Group, which had a 20-billion-dollar market capitalisation as of December 31, 2018.

Standard Bank Group, which operates in 20 African countries and is headquartered in Johannesburg, South Africa, has a 156-year history. It has over 53,000 employees, 1,200 branches and over 9,000 Automated Teller Machine (ATMs). Its earnings for 2018 were 2.1 billion dollars, while total assets stood at 148 billion dollars.

The new planned bottling plant in Sebeta will rest on 14.3ha of land, requires an investment outlay of 70 million dollars and is expected to create 500 new jobs.

“CCBA’s expansion in the country … is a vital part of our overall investment ambitions in Ethiopia,” says Daryl Wilson, managing director of CCBA Ethiopia.

Novida Pineapple can be applied with other beverages as a cocktail, according to Tigist Getu, brand manager of the Coca-Cola Company in Ethiopia, who adds that the product targets supermarkets, hotels, bars, restaurants and quick-service eateries.

Mesfin Teshager (PhD), a lecturer at Bahir Dar University’s College of Business & Economics, recommends the company aggressively promote the product.

“At this time all consumers are asking that new products have a distinctiveness from other goods,” said Mesfin.

Mesfin also recommends that the company place a price tag on the product to sustain a large demand.

 

Nestle Pulls out of Water Investment

Nestle Water, a wing of the Swiss multinational company, cut ties with Great Abyssinia Spring Waters after three years of partnership at the end of last month.

Nestle Water, subsidiary of the Nestle Group, transferred its 51pc share to the original owner, Great Abyssinia, which ventured into the business after changing its name to Blue Mountain. Tewdros Zerihun, Gobezayheu Zerihun and Dawit Zerihun, the owners of Great Abyssinia, transferred the majority share of the company to Nestle Water back in 2016.

Nestle, which has investments in Nestle NIDO, Nestle Maggie and Nescafe, has lately decided to exit the water business in Ethiopia. The financial transaction for the transfer of the shares was not disclosed.

“We review our business operations regularly to ensure that we continue to deliver sustainable results,” said Bethlehem Hailu, corporate affairs & sustainability manager for Asia, the Middle East and Africa at Nestlé Waters. “We’re making changes to our bottled water businesses globally and this is reflected in Ethiopia.”

Following the departure, Nestle laid off 17 employees from the head office after compensating them. However, there has been no impact on the employees at its manufacturing site in Sululta, and the terms and conditions of their employment agreements remain unchanged.

Nestle Ethiopia commenced operations in 2006, serving as the headquarters of subsidiary Nestle Horn of Africa Cluster that oversees market development across Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia and Somalia.

The company also transferred the landscape management rehabilitation project to Great Abyssinia Spring Waters. It took up the project in partnership with the Oromia Regional Government and the Water & Land Resource Center of Addis Abeba University. A research contract for the project, which included a 3.5 million Br grant from Nestle Ethiopia to hire 20 researchers and surveyors, has been progressing for two years.

Nestle Water built a water station in Sululta that provides 20,000lt of water a day to the surrounding community. In partnership with the town municipality, the bottler managed to dig two deep wells, which are owned by the municipality, to enhance the flow of the water to meet the city’s demand.

Great Abyssinia was founded in the early 1990s with a sole owner called Abyssinia Tea & Coffee Enterprise that had 10,000 Br in initial investment capital, an old and rundown machine and 10 employees. Now it has ventured into multiple businesses ranging from coffee export, water and soft drink bottling, juice processing and operating a commercial plaza.

Great Abyssinia Spring Waters, which was established in 2007, sources the water from the plant located in Sululta, near the capital. Currently, the plant operates with 213 employees in the country.

The bottled water business is one of the fast-growing industries with 97 bottlers that have an annual production of 3.5 billion litres. However, the production only satisfies five percent of the growing population of over 100 million in the country.

The effect of the multinational company leaving the industry is not something that can be forecasted, according to Zewdie Shibere (PhD), assistant professor of business administration at Addis Abeba University’s School of Business & Economics.

“It depends on the performance and management of the local owners,” he said. “The country must improve its investment climate as to not chase away the foreign direct investment.”

Dashen Bank’s Profit Grows, Yet EPS Falls Off

Dashen Bank, one of the pioneering private banks, registered a considerable profit growth last fiscal year, yet its earnings per share (EPS) slid slightly due to the sale of more shares.

In the last fiscal year, the Bank netted one billion Br in profit, a 12pc increase from the preceding year. Its EPS, which has been in a spiral of decline in the past couple of years, fell by 28 Br to 408 Br.

While declining between 2013 and 2017, the fall in EPS lightly reversed two years ago until it fell again last year.

The reduction in EPS was due to slow-growing profit coupled with a considerable increase in paid-up capital, according to Abdulmenan Mohammed, a financial analyst based in London, the United Kingdom.

Dashen’s paid-up capital grew by 21pc to 2.7 billion Br, making it the second-most capitalised private bank, next to Awash that has a paid-up capital of 4.4 billion Br.

“Unless the management comes up with strategies to increase profit after tax or change its capitalisation policy,” said Abdulmenan, “further reduction or stagnation in EPS is inevitable.”

However, CEO Asfaw Alemu seems an optimist, pointing to management’s work on organisational structure, customer segmentation, deposit mobilisation and resource monitoring.

“After we finalise implementing our five-year strategic plan,” said Asfaw, “we’ll register positive performance in the coming three to four years.”

The strategic plan targets to increase the Bank’s capital and maintain investments, which will bring a better profit, according to the CEO.

Dashen has reported mixed results in income-generating activities. It did well in financial intermediation operation and some areas of non-financial intermediation.

Its interest on loans and advances, NBE bonds and other deposits soared by 33pc to 4.3 billion Br and net fees and commissions income went up by 20pc  to 788.1 million Br. Yet gains on foreign exchange dealings plummeted for the second consecutive year by 31pc to 101.4 million Br.

“This is very concerning,” said the expert, “it needs serious attention of the management.”

Neway Beyene, the board chairperson of the Bank, stated that the disappointing performance of exports, the chronic forex crunch and spiraling inflation were headaches for the Bank.

“These have been big and persistent challenges,” remarked Neway in his message to shareholders in the annual report.

Asefaw said that the foreign currency earnings of the Bank through remittances, exports, SWIFT and cash exchange, in fact grew marginally by 1.5pc.

“However, the dismal performance in exports and the continued wide gap in exchange rates of the official and parallel markets had impacts on the process,” said Asfaw.

Dashen disbursed loans and advances of 32.4 billion Br, an increase of 40pc, while mobilising 44.7 billion Br in deposits, an increase of 22pc. This made the loan-to-deposit ratio of the Bank go up by eight percentage points to 72pc.

“This is a remarkable performance,” commented Abdulmenan.

Dashen reversed its provision for impairment of loans and other assets by 14.1 million Br.

“Such a massive reduction helped Dashen improve its profit performance,” said the expert, “this indicates that the level of credit risk was well controlled.”

In line with expansion in business, the expenses of Dashen increased. Interest paid on deposits soared by 35pc to 1.9 billion Br. Salaries and benefits increased by 27pc to 1.4 billion Br, while general administration expenses went up by 28pc to 752.8 million Br.

In the reported period, the Bank raised its time deposit interest rate based on the demand of clients, according to the CEO. He also added that due to the new organisational structure that was implemented last year, the Bank increased salaries.

Branch rental costs spiked, as well as growth in promotional, stationary and health insurance for employees, according to Asfaw.

Dashen’s assets increased by 24pc to 56.2 billion Br. The investments in NBE five-year bonds increased by 21pc to 12.3 billion Br. These investments account for 22pc of total assets and 27pc of total deposits of the Bank.

Liquidity analysis indicates that the liquidity level of Dashen decreased in value and relative terms. Its cash and bank balances drifted down by 15pc to six billion Birr. Its ratio of liquid assets to total assets fell to 11pc from 15.5pc. Dashen’s ratio of liquid assets to total liabilities also decreased to 12pc from 17.8 pc.

“This must have been due to increased lending activities,” remarked the expert.

The management of Dashen should take extra caution from a further reduction of the liquidity level, according to Abdulmenan.

Asfaw, who believes that a Bank’s achievement is measured by its loan provision, argues that the Bank was using its cash efficiently and it invested based on its plan.

Dashen has capital and non-distributable reserves of 5.1 billion Br and a capital adequacy ratio (CAR) of 15.9pc.

This shows that Dashen is a well-capitalised bank, according to Abdulmenan.

Despite Profitability, Ethio Life’s Shareholder Return Drops

Despite a considerable growth in profit, Ethio Life & General Insurance’s earnings per share (EPS) fell by 10pc in the 2018/19 fiscal year.

The company netted 25.9 million Br in profit, achieving 10pc growth. However, its EPS fell by 21 Br to 214.2 Br. The EPS decline was caused by an increase in paid-up capital, which was boosted by a massive 32.1pc to 122 million Br.

Shimeles G. Giorgis, the company’s chief executive officer, explains that the management’s effort to increase premium production and diversifying the company’s income streams has contributed to the growth in profit for the company.

The underwriting surplus soared by 34pc to 67.7 million Br, mainly due to a reduction in claims. The total gross written premium both in life and general insurance grew by 21pc to 160.3 million Br.

The company performed well, despite serious and numerous challenges, according to Yoseph Endeshaw, board chairperson of the company.

“Political instability, chronic forex crunch, worsening inflation and fierce competition in the industry were the challenges,” remarked Yoseph in his message to shareholders.

The growth rate is remarkable, according to Abdulmenan Mohammed, a financial analyst with close to two decades of experience.

Out of total gross written premium, 43.3 million Br was ceded to reinsurers, leading the retention rate to slightly grow by 0.5 percentage points to 73pc.

Even though the retention rate increased, there is still room for further growth, according to Abdulmenan.

The average retention rate of insurance companies stands at more than 77pc.

Claims paid and provided for went down by 10pc to 44.5 million Br. Over the past few years, claims at the firm have been declining, while the industry is challenged by soaring claims.

“This is impressive,” noted Abdulmenan.

Careful underwriting and claims management practices are the main reason for claim reduction, according to the CEO.

In the reporting period, the company paid 11.3 million Br in commission to agents, an increase of 45pc.

This shows that the firm spent more money to attract customers due to tough competition, according to Abdulmenan.

The involvement of intermediaries in the business also boosted commission payments, according to Shimeles.

“Further, there are major classes of businesses that required a greater commission like bond and engineering-related activities,” Shimeles said.

Ethio Life & General reported a mixed performance in investment activities. Interest earned on time deposits decreased by six percent to 16.6 million Br, whereas dividend income increased by 17pc to just over two million Birr.

The company’s expenses expanded considerably due to the expansion of the business. Salaries and benefits went up by 28pc to 30.3 million Br, while general administration expenses spiked by 17pc to 20 million Br.

The expert cautions the management to watch the growth of salaries and benefits.

Last year the company opened two branches, pushing its total branch network to 22, of which 20 branches were for general and two were for life and health insurance. It also has two more contact offices. It gave salary raises to its 185 employees.

The company has transferred 9.5 million Br to its life fund, an increase of 82pc.

The total assets held by Ethio Life & General increased by 23pc to 477.6 million Br. Out of this 148.7 million Br was invested in fixed time deposits, while 47.4 million Br was invested in shares, bonds and properties.

Its capital and non-distributable reserves account for 27.3pc of its total assets.

These investments account for 41pc of the total assets of the company. This proportion is far lower than the preceding year’s ratio of 47.7pc.

This must have been due to increased liquidity, according to the expert.

The company invested in Addis International Bank and other financial institutions. It also bought a seven-storey building with 90 million Br, both contributing to the increase in its total assets. The firm already acquired its own building and is currently building a recovery site.

Liquidity analysis shows that cash and bank balances of Ethio Life & General increased in value and in relative terms. Cash and bank balances soared by 79pc to 73.1 million Br. The ratio of cash and bank balances to total assets went up to 15pc from 10.2pc.

The liquidity level of the firm is twice the average of other insurance companies.

The management should consider reducing its liquidity level by investing more money in income-generating activities, according to Abdulmenan.

Dereje Worku, a shareholder of the firm for the past seven years, says that he is satisfied with the company’s performance.

The economic condition of the country challenged the financial industry, according to him.

“Many financial institutions have failed in achieving a considerable profit,” he said. “The capital investment is a worthy way in a time where the inflation rate is heavily increasing.”

New Water Bottler Joins Burgeoning Industry

A new water bottling company joined the growing industry in Danglia town, Awi Zone of Amhara Regional State with a total investment of 62 million Br.

Kefeta Spring Water, a new plant founded by Sirajdin Hussen, rests on 1,800Sqm of land. The company secured a conformity certificate from the Ethiopian Conformity Assessment Enterprise on December 19, 2019, and had a soft launch in the same month.

Fereja Dawud General Contractor, a five-year-old firm founded by Fereja Dawud that previously worked on construction related to telecom towering, was in charge of the civil work of the plant that took eight months. Haile Consultancy Architects & Engineering Plc, a four-year-old firm behind the construction of Wanzaye Lodge, a five-star hotel owned by the Amhara Development Association, supervised the construction of the plant.

The company imported ASG and Tecklong machinery, both automated, from China. Chenyu Packing Machinery supplied the machinery. HPC Chemical & Consulting, which was established in 2015 and produces food, cosmetics, soap and plastic, installed the machinery in two years.

The installation, the import and the launching of the plant took four years.

The Development Bank of Ethiopia (DBE) covered half of the investment, which the owner of the company used to procure the machinery.

Kefeta’s water is produced from a 210m deep well, and the plant has a production line of five sizes of bottled waters ranging from 330ml to two litres and can bottle 18,000 of the smallest size bottles an hour.

The company started operations with 42 employees and plans to increase this to 72, according to Yesuf Endris, deputy general manager of Kefeta, which also plans to introduce a juice bottling plant after a year.

“We plan to increase our workforce as production ramps up,” said Yesuf.

All 97 bottled water companies in Ethiopia produce 3.7 billion litres of water a year, satisfying five percent of the water demand of the country.

“Our target market is the local consumer,” said Yesuf, “and we plan to roll out extensively to the whole nation following next week.”

Along with the juice processing plant, the owners aspire to start production of IV glucose. Currently, they are preparing a proposal for the local investment commission to secure an investment license. The proposal includes a cost analysis and the production capacity of the plant.

Currently, they are awaiting approval from the Amhara Regional Health Bureau on the feasibility of the area to open an IV glucose production plant, according to Yesuf.

The company has received 8,000Sqm of land for the construction of the IV glucose plant. After getting a green light from the investment commission, the owners plan to import the machinery from Italy. The machinery would cost the owners close to 60 million Br.

The water bottling industry is getting more competitive, according to Getie Andualem (PhD), an associate professor at Addis Abeba University’s Marketing Department.

“It’s evident that it will create more job opportunities and will also contribute to addressing the current demand for water,” he said.

Getie also says that the competitiveness of the industry will drive down the price of bottled water, thereby making it accessible to all types of consumers.

Getie also observed that most water bottlers end up opening juice bottling plants alongside their initial investment, utilising the wasted water that is not bottled for direct consumption.

“This should be encouraged,” he said.

Commercial Bank Procures Money Counters

Commercial Bank of Ethiopia (CBE), the state banking giant, procured cash counting machines from a Korean company for close to 80.2 million Br.

Ebanking Technology Co. Ltd, a Korean banknote counter manufacturer that has previously supplied machines to 12 banks including Awash, Abay, Lion, and Development Bank of Ethiopia, supplied the cash counting machines.

So far, the company has supplied 1,900 of the machines, while the remaining are being loaded from the ports and are expected to be delivered in mid-March 2020, according to Ermiyas Alemayheu, an assistant technical manager at Impact Technology Plc.

Ebanking, which is also known for supplying ICT equipment including computers, laptops, cash counting machines, generators and forex counterfeit detection machines, delivered the machines through its local partner, Impact Technology. It supplied the machine with a unit price of 300 dollars.

The bank floated the bid for the purchase of the machines on November 13, 2018, with a closing date of December 27, 2018. And Ebanking, which was deemed qualified both in technical and financial evaluations, was awarded the contract on August 15, 2019.

The model Ebanking supplied has different features such as colour screens that display the date and time when it is on standby mode. It counts Birr notes other than 100 Br denominations, unlike other counting machines. The machines also bear the logo of the Bank and its preferred colour.

In 2015, Ebanking Technology supplied 3,764 cash counting machines to CBE through Impact Technology.

The Bank is buying the machines due its aggressive branch expansion, according to Yeabsera Kebede, corporate communications acting director at the Bank, which mobilised 31.8 billion Br in deposits in the first half of this fiscal year.

The machines will be additions to the existing cash counting apparatuses in the 1,557 branches of the Bank.

Currently, CBE has 2.5 million account holders and the number of mobile banking users reached 3.5 million, while Automated Teller Machine (ATM) cards and CBE Birr users reached 6.1 million and 2.6 million, respectively.

Hailemariam Kebede (PhD), a lecturer at Addis Abeba University’s School of Commerce, believes that having enough cash counting machines will make the service easier and saves customers from being frustrated by unnecessary waiting at the customer service windows.

“Having its own brand is a good thing, because it will take the customer service and physical appearance of the Bank one step forward,” said Hailemariam.

Hailemariam also recommends that the Bank work on system infrastructure like ATM terminals in an effort to boost customer service.

What Keeps AfDB’s President up at Night?

The African Development Bank (AfDB) recently published its flagship annual report, the African Economic Outlook 2020, in time for the African Union Summit of Heads of State, where it testified to the promising rate of growth by African countries as well as challenges such as economic inequality. Tamrat G. Giorgis, Fortune’s managing editor, sat down with Akinwumi Adesina (PhD), president of the half-century-old Bank to opine on new opportunities for employment, income inequality, debt structure and how GDP is not edible.

Fortune: How much of that injection of new capital worth 115 billion dollars into the AfDB, doubling the Bank’s capital base, will shift the bank from its traditional focus on financing infrastructure in Africa into private sector support or other areas that are crucial for the economy of Africa?

Akinwumi Adesina: I am very delighted with the tremendous increase in the capital of the Bank. Our shareholders expressed tremendous confidence in us. The capital increase of the Bank went from 93 billion dollars to 208 billion dollars. It is the largest increase in capital since the bank was established in 1964. I am delighted by that.

I am also delighted for African countries. But it is not just the capital of the Bank itself. We also have a concessional arm of the Bank called the African Development Fund that allows us to invest in low-income countries and fragile states. We replenish it every three years. It was replenished in December of last year with a total amount of 7.6 billion dollars, which is an increase of 32pc compared with what we used to have.

Q: Any change in focus or priority for years to come?

We are not going to do more new things. We are just going to do more of what we have been doing best. And those areas have been set. It is called the “high-fives” of the Bank. It is about helping to light up and power Africa; to feed Africa; to industrialise Africa; to integrate Africa and to improve the quality of life for the people of Africa.

In the last four years, we have been able to finance and to connect 18 million people to electricity. That is massive. And we’ve been able to provide access for 140 million people to [utilise] agricultural technologies for enhanced food security. That is incredible. We have given 13 million people access to finance, most of those actually small and middle-sized enterprises.

Through our investment in infrastructure, we have 101 million people with access to transport. When you take water and sanitation, which is important for the quality of life, we provide 16 million people with access to water and sanitation. Those are all the things we are going to do more of.

Now, the exciting critical projects that are going be landmarks as you look down the next three, four or five years, the first one is going to be in energy. It is going to be in the Sahara. It is called the “Desert to Power,” which is across 11 countries. That will provide 250 million people with access to electricity, and 90 million of those are going to be off-grid.

The second one you are going to see us spend a lot of money on is the empowerment of women. I launched the initiative called “Affirmative Finance Action for Women in Africa”, to help mobilise three billion dollars of financing only for businesses of women.

The other one is going to be on youth. We’re going to spend a tremendous amount of money on the youth, because I do not believe that the youth are the future of Africa. They are the present of Africa. They need to have access to finance. We have started talking about how we will help establish what is called Youth Entrepreneurship Investment Banks that are going to be banks supporting or working for young people in the continent.

Of course, we will continue to invest in infrastructure. You cannot have development without infrastructure. You need rail, ports, ICT infrastructure. These are bread and butter stuff for us, which we do every time and we will continue to do. Especially, given that the African Continental Free Trade Area, which has opened tremendous opportunities for Africa. All of that just to say that we have quantum capital. We will continue to do more of what we are doing but at a greater scale. We will identify some of the areas that are going to be landmarked going forward. We are all set.

Q: The goal is to bring economic growth to Africa and somehow lift people from poverty. Largely, this is being measured by gross domestic product (GDP). Last week, you said in a statement that “you can’t eat GDP”. But what else do you have other than GDP to measure an economy?

It is not about what you measure. GDP is the standard thing that we use in economies to measure growth. When you say that you are growing and that is okay … but people do not eat it.

If I say GDP per capita is 15,000 dollars, what does that mean for you? Are you going to take that to the bank and use it as security to get a loan?

We have got to look beyond the numbers. We have got to look at what they mean in the lives of people. You want to make sure that it is not just good numbers that we are talking about. It is how many people have access to health, to water and sanitation, how many young people are getting jobs.

How are you going to make sure that the quality of life is going up?

That is what really matters. Growth is only meaningful to the extent to which it impacts the lives of people. That is my point, and I will continue to make that point. Growth must be inclusive, but growth must be at a faster level. Africa is doing well; do not get me wrong.

If you take a look at our growth projections for this year: it is about 3.9pc and next year is about 4.1pc. But we need to go double-digit so that you have a quantum growth that can actually lift hundreds of millions of people out of poverty. And we must make sure that the growth is targeted.

Take a look at rural areas in Africa, where we are investing as AfDB. We are investing for over 10 years, 25 billion dollars in agriculture. Why? Because 75pc of the poor are actually living in rural areas. We want to make sure that we turn agriculture into a big business that works for them, not just for the big guys. We want to help. African countries develop special agro-industrial processing zones. Whether you are processing tea, coffee or cocoa, you will add value to it, because you will have the infrastructure in rural areas that allows food and agro-businesses to process and add value to food.

That will create new results of economic prosperity that the youth and the poor in the rural areas will have their [quality of] life go up significantly.

Q: The AfDB has a growing concern of inequality in Africa. If that is the case, are you not alarmed by the impact of liberalisation in African economies that the Bank itself is advocating?

The issue of inequality will always continue to be very important. How you share resources is really going to determine who benefits from growth. How do women benefit from growth if they do not have access, for example, to property rights, access to land? How do young people benefit from growth if they do not have financial ecosystems that allow them to have the finance they need to turn their ideas into real businesses? Those are the real issues.

I grew out of poverty. For me, poverty is not theoretical at all. You talk about Gini Coefficients; I was part of those people they used to measure. We have got to be practical. We have got to make sure that we are doing things that impact the lives of people. And that is what the AfDB continues to do.

Let us even take the case of what it means in terms of economies-to-economies. Look at some other countries that are growing today; you have countries that are doing so well. Rwanda is at about 8.2pc. You look at Tanzania, Ethiopia, Senegal, Côte d’Ivoire. These are some of the top-performing countries that we have.

But what happens to the fragile countries? What happens to the smaller states like Mali and Niger? Because they are landlocked countries and they are facing fragility, which actually makes their growth recede. We have got to make sure that growth is not just total growth but also inclusive growth. On this, I think Africa is actually doing well according to the numbers that we have. If you look at the growth number, yes 3.9pc is what we see for the continent for this year. But do not forget 20 countries in Africa are growing at three percent to five percent and 20 countries above five percent. We just have to make sure that growth is more even. Even across regions and countries.

Q: When it comes to the best performers in Africa, their growth is driven by public expenditure that is largely financed by loans from the likes of China. But you do not seem too worried about the prospect of a debt crisis. Why?

Why do I have to worry when we do not have a crisis? If you look at the mean debt-to-GDP ratio of Africa by 2018, it is about 56pc. Yes, it has gone up from roughly about 38pc from where it used to be in 10 years. But do not forget that the debt-to-GDP ratio of Africa today is still within the manageable level, almost at about 34pc. We do not have a systemic debt problem in Africa. We do have particular countries that are over-extended in terms of debt. And so, they may be at risk of debt distress.

Q: Does that include Ethiopia?

It is one of the countries that I admire the most. Ethiopia’s economic growth has constantly been very high over more than 15 years. The question you have to ask yourself is, why? Ethiopia takes debt, but Ethiopia is not taking debt for consumption.

You have got two kinds of debt that you can take. If you have a credit card, you can go take your credit card and buy hamburgers. That is one kind of debt. Call it “hamburger debt”. You take the second credit card and you invest in real estate. Now, are they the same kind of debt? The quality of debt matters. What are you spending the debt on?

If you are taking debt to invest in quality infrastructure that is going to allow you to unlock growth and income streams in the future, that is good debt. But if you are taking debt to pay for economic expenditure, that is what I call “hamburger debt”.

But that is not what Ethiopia is doing. Ethiopia is investing massively in infrastructure. We are supporting Ethiopia, for example, to construct the road, the highway that links Addis Abeba to Nairobi, all the way to Mombasa. One thousand kilometres. The African Development Bank invested a billion dollars in that. Look at what it has done.

It has increased the trade between Ethiopia and Kenya by 400pc. And you are a land-locked country, so it gives you access to the Mombasa port very fast. The second one we are working on right now with the Prime Minister is designing the standard gauge that will link Ethiopia back to Sudan, among other things that we are doing. The challenge of Ethiopia has to do more with the revenue profile, it has to do more with exports and the ability to salvage some of that debt.

Q: The expenditure and domestic mobilisation should be a source of worry. Do you not agree?

There are issues across many countries. When you look at the whole debt profile, a lot of the debt that has been taken is … the composition is changing.

Take, for example, 35pc of the debt is coming out of domestic debt. That is coming out of the private sector. The other part of it is that, as countries have done well in terms of the macro-economic environment, they are able to get ratings. They can actually easily go to Europe to boost their own bonds to raise money on international capital markets.

You take, for example, also the increased importance of bilateral debt, and that’s why you mentioned the case of China, a non-Paris Club debt, and that is rising. But Africa does not have a systemic debt crisis at all. I do not want any kind of news that is not based on data.

However, we need to be better disciplined in terms of public expenditures. You spend within what you have. And that is very important – the efficiency of public expenditure. Secondly, a lot needs to be done in mobilising domestic financing. If you have, for example, tax-to-GDP ratios that are quite low in many countries, you have a lot of room to mobilise more taxes and improve the tax administration. And the effectiveness of that in countries is very important.

Thirdly, it is the size of the institutional investors that we have. Pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, insurance pools of funds. In Africa, total, 1.8 trillion dollars. If we actually do a good job at that, leveraging a lot of that to go into investment in power, in water, in roads, in rail, do you not think we are going to be making faster progress without getting in debt? It is how you actually do that.

Q: You spend a lot of money on infrastructure hoping that the economy will shift from being agriculture-led to manufacturing-led. That did not happen.

Well, that is what needs to continue to change. For example, Ethiopia is, and I want to commend the Prime Minister for opening up the economy, making it easier for the private sector, not just the government. This is also part of the problem there. In Africa, more generally, and not just Ethiopia, most of the infrastructure expenditures are covered by the government. Thirty-percent of all the infrastructure expenditure in Africa is done by the government.

But for quite a lot of them, they can be done through PPP [public-private partnership] arrangements. Ethiopia has done a very good job of liberalising some of the service sectors – the financial services, the telecom sector. Those are very good things that will bring in private capital; the government does not always have to bear the whole load.

Q: We now see the US being quite aggressive in trying to dislodge China from its foothold in Africa. There is a battle between the East and the West for economic dominance over the continent. They say that Africa is the last frontier. To what extent does this worry you?

It does not worry me at all. Africa is not a frontier for anybody to conquer. Africa is an investment destination that everybody wants to pay attention to. Take a look at it: you have the China-Africa summit; the US-Africa summit; the India-Africa summit; the Japan-Africa summit and the Russia-Africa summit. What are they saying?

Q: Africa is the last frontier?

It is not a frontier. It is that Africa presents a tremendous opportunity that everybody has seen. Look at the population that Africa has, which is going to be driving consumption. You look at urbanisation. This is the place to be, right?

Africa chooses its friends; its partners and it develops arrangements with multiple plans, multiple groups of investors or countries that it wants to work with.

Africa is mature enough to determine what it wants to do and who it wants to do it with. What we say in AfDB is this, make sure that any transaction that you do is transparent; you have good governance; you make sure corruption is zero. I do not even think reducing corruption is the issue; we must have a corruption-free Africa. Zero tolerance for that.

And making sure that negotiations with any country is not asymmetric. It is in your interest. You look first for what is in Africa’s interest. Take, for example, what we do at the AfDB. We have got a lot of countries that come into Africa interested in minerals, mining, metals, oil and gas, but it is a very asymmetric negotiation. African countries give away their mines and oil and gas fields and production sharing agreements are not necessarily in their interest. The AfDB has something that is called the African Legal Support Facility, which we use to help countries negotiate even contracts they accepted in the past that are not in their interest.

We helped a particular country to re-negotiate their debt obligation to a very large country. Their debt obligation went down by 94pc, because we helped them to negotiate better.

Some of the countries that are coming to negotiate with you have more tax lawyers than your entire country has. This is our role as AfDB. But when it comes to the issue of the big elephant in the room, China is a very big part of Africa. Bilateral trade between China and Africa is several billion dollars. Bilateral trade with the US is also rising. It is not as big as it is with China, but they all bring different things.

At the end of the day, Africa has to determine what it wants and the terms and conditions of those engagements.

Q: You are well exposed, highly traveled and have dealt with different countries in and outside of Africa. What keeps you up at night? What is your biggest concern?

I have a mindset that is not a problem-focused. I have a mindset of opportunities. How can I help? How can my bank help? How can I work with others and partners, because we do not work alone to unlock opportunities for Africa continually?

There are challenges that one has to pay attention to. One big challenge is the whole issue of youth unemployment. That keeps me awake at night. The biggest challenge that Africa has, the biggest threat – as bad as terrorism is, it is not the biggest threat – the biggest threat is youth unemployment.

At the AfDB, we are now thinking of how we can support our young people. You can say, well, the education system has not prepared them well. We can agree. When they go and get skills, they come back and get no jobs. The financial ecosystem is not designed for young people. The idea dies in their head, they become more discouraged and you create a social crisis.

One of the biggest things that keep me awake at night is, how do we develop a new financial ecosystem that will support the young people and unlock their potential? Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, if he was living in Africa, would not succeed, because he would not have had access to that amount of resources that he had. We are talking now about countries helping to stimulate the creation and establishment of what we call Youth Entrepreneurship Investment Banks. These are going to be banks of young people that will bank on their ideas, that will believe in them, that will help them to grow their business in the life-cycle of their businesses. I want African young people thriving, not going anywhere. Why must they? They must be on this continent. But to do that, you need a financial ecosystem to support them with access to capital that is cheap and can allow them to grow through equity financing.

Q: Are you as much worried about climate change and its adverse impact?

I have been pushing the global community to support Africa’s adaptation to climate change. We, as a bank, are doing our part. We have increased our financing for climate finance from 12.5 billion dollars to 25 billion dollars.

Fifty percent of our financing is going to climate adaptation. We are the first multilateral development bank actually to have that. Climate change and the jobs issue are worrying. Of course, everybody likes to worry about economic headwinds that happen globally.

How do we make sure that we are not on the receiving end of many of these things? The ACFTA offers us a huge opportunity to do that, to make it work so that we can trade a lot more with ourselves and reduce our dependence on external exports of raw commodities that exposes us to commodity price volatility.

Structurally, if we can get the ACFTA to work, do the right things by young people to unlock their potential so that is not demographic crisis management but actually investment management in them but also, at the same time, addressing climate change, I think I will sleep better at night.

Unwary Tribalists

It is hard to forget a teacher who makes an impression on us. I had one of those, and I would never forget his colourful eye-catching slides and PowerPoint notes and the profound remarks he used to make in the classroom.

Once, he discussed tribalism through a peculiarly affecting anecdote. He started by explaining what most people generally know about the term, much of which is relevant to our current political situation. Tribes, formed along religious, cultural or racial fault lines, are created by people organising together through mostly historical circumstances and share a deep sense of loyalty.

The term generally gives a negative connotation by implying that people band together based on inherited or opportunistic physical traits, lifestyles and worldviews they believe are superior to that of others.

My teacher though preferred to explain it differently. Sitting at the back of a taxi, he noticed a lady next to him holding a baby. Right next to her was a girl, and the baby’s shoes were rubbing against her dress. The girl noticed the mud the baby was getting on her and got mad, berating the woman.

At that moment, he decided to interfere. He turned around and said it is just a dress, and the mud can be washed out.

“What is the big deal?” he asked the class. “Why is it that we may not mind the mess our own children or the children of friends or relatives make? We tend to tolerate the irritating things our kids do, but our patience wears thin when it comes to tolerating other people’s children. This is tribalism.”

It is not hard to see where he was coming from. Our tribalistic nature comes out in our outright identification with our kin, which makes every one of us a bad fit for society. But it is hard not to sympathise with our cause as well.

What if we are not around to look after them or provide for them? If everyone is too busy caring for their own children, what would happen to those who do not have someone to look after them?

How tribalism affects our sense of community can also be observed in our relationship with our kin versus that of others. There was a time children were raised by neighbours as well as the parents. When the children behaved badly, they used to be scolded or sometimes disciplined through force; and parents somehow were okay with that decision.

Nowadays, if one was to lightly scold a neighbour’s child for doing something mischievous, that person would be in quite a conundrum. As with most troublesome areas of our society, I trace this to the overpowering Western influence that seems to have us forsaking our own culture. Children are to be treated like adults, and parenting must be conducted at the absolute minimum lest the child become psychologically damaged.

Industrialisation is no less a culprit, destroying communities and reducing individuals living in the same area to social atoms that rarely ever get to see each other. As a result, the neighbour has become a stranger – no longer part of the tribe. Even the babysitters and caregivers who are hired are there for the money at the end of the day and do not care for the child as much as the community used to, however large the salary may be.

As much as we usually like to lambast the tribalism we witness in our politics, we have failed to observe how atomised we are becoming individually as well. This is tribalism in itself and, as in our politics, it is destroying our sense of community.

Liquidity Crisis Hits the Fan

Liquidity problems have hit the banking industry since mid-November of last year. The liquidity crunch has caused glitches in the inter-bank settlement process at the central bank and complicated the withdrawing of large amounts of money from bank branches. To alleviate the problem, the National Bank of Ethiopia (NBE) has recently availed 14.5 billion Br in loans to banks. Furthermore, the regulator demanded commercial banks submit details on their loans and cash flows.

Mild liquidity problems occasionally happen in the industry due to seasonal factors. What makes this time different is the severity of the problem, pushing the regulator to demand the detailed lending activities of the banks. For the cause of the problem, we have to look to none other than poor liquidity management of banks and the passivity of the central bank.

In the past couple of years, there has been a marked increase in loans and advances by private banks. The state-owned Commercial Bank of Ethiopia (CBE) has also operated with tight liquid resources as it financed mega projects for several years. By late June last year, private banks had surpassed the 70pc loan-to-deposit ratio, the ideal mark in normal banking operation. This was despite the fact that their funds, which accounted for 27pc of deposits, were being held in NBE bonds.

The increase in loans and advances was observed across all private banks. It seems that the unusual demand for loans and advances was caused by soaring inflation that drove real interest rates down. The scramble to disburse more loans and advances, without due regard to the level of liquidity, required for expanding branch networks and increasing deposits has drained the banks, resulting in thinning average cash holdings for every branch and squeezing their payment and settlement balances with the central bank.

Between 2018 and 2019, liquid assets (cash in hand and payment settlement accounts with the NBE), which are actively used for day-to-day operations of banks, declined considerably. They went down to 7.6pc from 14.3pc of deposits due to a surge in lending activities. The reduction of the balance of payment and settlement accounts was also sharp enough to have gotten the attention of the bank executives and the regulator, plummeting to 1.7pc from 5.9pc of deposits. The decline was not an isolated case of a few banks, but it happened across the industry.

The decrease in the liquidity level could be observed as early as June 2019.  As economic activity slowed down, and the demand for cash decreased between June and September as always, the problem was not felt. After October when economic activities picked up and demand for cash began to increase (for instance, the money supply outside banks increased by 16.4pc between the first and third quarters of the 2018/19 fiscal year, similar to the same period in the preceding year) due to seasonal factors such as the harvest of crops, payment of taxes and dividends, the liquidity problem started to emerge.

During the preceding years, the industry did not face serious liquidity problems as banks were operating with a liquidity level way above the minimum threshold. But now, the thinning liquidity level due to increased lending coupled with seasonal demand for more cash may have caused the liquidity crunch. In addition, political instability and the economic slowdown may have played its part in non-repayment of loans, which deprived banks of liquid resources.

The liquidity problem could have been solved through the inter-bank money market if the problem affected a few banks only and there was a properly functioning market. But the money market has remained inactive for several years. That is why the central bank stepped in. As much as the injection of massive money into the banking system can address the liquidity crisis, it will also add to the inflationary pressure that is afflicting the economy unless the newly injected money is pulled out as swiftly as possible.

Injection of liquidity is a temporary fix. When banks repay the injected loan, the problem may crop up once more. A measure that will enable banks to build up sufficient liquid resources to run their day-to-day operations smoothly should be the proper policy response.

It has been several years since the current liquidity requirement was set. The current liquidity requirement stands at 15pc of net current liabilities. Out of this, five percent is held in a reserve account, which is not usable for transaction purposes and a significant amount is maintained in foreign currencies. When these two balances are taken out, the minimum liquidity requirement, the liquid funds usable for day-to-day operations, is much smaller.

Operating with such tight liquid resources is difficult considering the fast monetisation of the economy and the increasing financial inclusion that brought millions of small savers that frequent banks for withdrawal into the banking network.

The central bank needs to consider increasing the liquidity requirement. This should be accompanied by setting two tiers of liquidity levels – overall liquidity level as a proportion of net liabilities and a minimum balance of cash in hand and settlement account as a proportion of net liabilities. Breaching these requirements should entail a punitive interest rate. Moreover, activating the inter-banking money market will help to smooth out the functioning of the banking industry.

With Fewer Children Comes Development

Much of the well-trod terrain is covered on the dangers of unconstrained population growth in a recent piece headlined, “Marshall Plan for Africa Now or Doom by 2050,” [Volume 20, No 1026, December 29, 2019], by Yonas Biru, a former World Bank official.

Unmitigated population growth will place a greater burden on already scarce infrastructure and resources; societal unhappiness will soar with more unemployment; dangerous illegal migration will flourish; and the twin degradations of deforestation and global warming will make for a “nuclear cocktail,” in the author’s words.

All of that rings true and lends itself well to his proposal for a significant increase in foreign aid. But buried in the piece is a revolutionary proposal: “Aggressive population control should cut Africa’s population growth rate by more than half in 20 years.”

Sub-Saharan Africa’s population growth rate was 2.7pc in 2018, according to the World Bank, with Ethiopia just a hair below at 2.6pc. This translates to roughly 4.8 births per woman (4.3 in Ethiopia). Cutting the rate in half would mean that by 2040, African and Ethiopian women would have on average closer to two children. This might not be too far off if current trends continue. The birth rate was 7.4 as recently as 1984.

But while much smaller family sizes may be on the horizon, it is not necessary to only focus on the negative consequences of failing to curtail population growth. In fact, the greater reason for this policy is the significant effect smaller family sizes have on economic development.

For decades, development economists have studied the causes of growth to determine what can be done to raise the living standards of developing economies more quickly. In the Solow Growth Model, which has become the standard for most subsequent development models, investment equals the savings rate multiplied by a function of output by each worker. If the savings rate rises, investment rises in tandem and pushes up the overall output of workers.

While most growth models use a static savings rate, China’s one-child policy gives us a real-world experiment about what happens to national savings when the fertility rate is reduced. In 1979 China embarked on a series of reforms that ended up building the economic powerhouse we see today. Chief among them was the Draconian policy of limiting families to having one biological child.

Though this policy does not meet the human rights threshold for many observers, the net effect was drastically increasing the savings rate of Chinese households. This, in turn, allowed the society to significantly increase its investment rate, which helped launch the 1979 to 2009 economic growth trajectory that brought 700 million Chinese out of poverty.

“The investment rate has a significantly positive effect on the growth of GDP per worker,” found researchers Sai Ding and John Knight in a 2009 article in The Journal of Comparative Economics, adding that, besides other factors, China’s success is due in part to low population growth. In a separate 2017 study, titled “The One-Child Policy and Household Saving”,  Taha Choukhmane, et al. find that “Quantitatively, the [one-child] policy can account for at least 30pc of the rise in aggregate saving.”

What this all means in laymen’s terms is that with fewer children to support, and the knowledge that an abundance of sons and daughters would not be around to take care of oneself in old age, Chinese couples began saving more of their salaries.

Those savings, in turn, were used to make investments, either in the quality of education for their only child, investment in their businesses, investment in other Chinese businesses or increased bank deposits. Increased bank deposits then allowed expanded lending to businesses to increase their fixed capital in the form of new machinery or factories.

In line with the Solow Growth Model, output increases with the more capital that is afforded to a worker. In the long run, this should raise wages, and thus aggregate investment, until a developing nation reaches its steady state where it converges with other developed economies.

Many academics find that China fits the 20th-century growth theory quite well. But Robert Lucas famously pointed out that many developing nations do not receive the level of foreign direct investment (FDI) that would be expected by Western growth models. Some blame this on weak institutions and government policies. Others place the blame on risk-averse international capital markets.

What can be said is that only one developing nation has ever taken these development models seriously enough to re-engineer their economy in such a short period. Most plod on in spurts and dribbles, acquiescing to whatever new global development trend becomes the decade’s buzzword.

 

Politics Dominates National Discourse, to the Detriment of the Economy

Senior government officials of African countries recently descended on Addis Abeba to attend the annual African Union (AU) Summit of Heads of State and Government. As was usual with these meetings, there was more fluff than substance. But there was a curious way in how the theme of the session – “Silencing the Guns” – was tackled.

It was an ambitious promise to end all conflicts and achieve peace in a continent blighted by problems that largely stem from the same governments that make up the organisation. In their discussions, the Union’s Commission, as well as the heads of state, gave substantially disproportionate focus to the relationship between instability and underdevelopment.

Even Moussa Faki Mahamat, chairperson of the African Union Commission, did not bring up the effect of lack of socioeconomic progress in fueling conflicts during his closing statement on February 9, 2020. To his credit, he pointed to inter-African trade and job creation for the youth as areas for improvement. But growing economic inequality in Africa received too little attention for a summit that concerned itself with silencing the guns. The growing inequality in the continent is superbly highlighted by the African Economic Outlook 2020, a flagship publication by the African Development Bank (AfDB), whose President, Akinwumi Adesina (PhD), was one of the delegates last week.

The role the economy plays in affecting politics was likewise all but forgotten when Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed (PhD) appeared before parliament on February 3, 2020. Legislators deserved credit in highlighting the increasing instances of the breakdown of law and order across the country in no uncertain terms in what was an uncharacteristic show of disappointment at the performance of the executive.

But not much was raised and discussed on the state of the economy.

Why was it lost on many MPs that the cost of living is escalating and major legislation set to shape the economy for decades was pushed their way by the Council of Ministers?

Coupled with an unabating foreign currency shortage, creeping devaluation of the Birr and rising demand, inflation reached 19.5pc in December. This set a worrying precedent in that it easily outpaces the average inflation rate of the last fiscal year, which stood at 13.7pc.

As inflation ramped up, liquidity levels were also going down at commercial banks as their loan-to-deposit ratios passed the legal threshold set forth by the National Bank of Ethiopia (NBE). But the central bank merely sat back and watched as banks’ liquidity levels reached a level where it was necessary to bail them out with 14.5 billion Br of loans.

MPs were no more worried about the murkiness of the liberalisation push. If they were, they did not show it. Ethiopia’s government has struck a deal with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, the details of which have not been made public, in exchange for the financing of almost six billion dollars. The agreement with the Fund will be the largest that has ever been afforded to Ethiopia since joining the institution as a founding member in 1945.

The administration of Prime Minister Abiy has also resumed its accession process into the World Trade Organisation (WTO) after eight years mainly characterised as lacking the political resolve to join. Ethiopia’s negotiators have offered to cut tariffs on 90pc of traded goods, a move that is sure to complicate the foreign currency crisis and long-held policies toward encouraging the expansion of the domestic manufacturing sector. They hope to conclude the deal within a year.

When an MP brought up Abiy’s “homegrown” economic policy, it was not to address its possible drawbacks. It was to make the political point that Prosperity Party (PP) is not following the economic policy platform the EPRDF was elected on in 2015. It was less about the reform itself but rather the legitimacy question surrounding Prosperity Party as heir to EPRDF’s incumbency.

Legislators’ seeming indifference to the economic malaise is symptomatic of the national discourse. There are few debates or forums that do not touch upon the breakdown of the rule of law, the fault lines on which the federal structure is established or government transparency.

Yet economic policy debates on unemployment, inequality, urbanisation, the cost of living or liberalisation are few. And if any, they are held far apart. There are few political parties in the country whose positions on politically hot-button issues are not explicit. It is in sharp contrast to how rare it is to find a party, outside Prosperity Party, and perhaps TPLF, with a stated economic position.

Politics has overwhelmingly dominated the space in which the national discourse is carried out. Considering the deteriorating state of the rule of law, the privatisation and regularisation of violence is an unavoidable topic of concern that deserves its fair share of attention. But the dearth of debate around the economy is unjustified when economic policies continue to be upended, the cost of living reduces households to poverty and banks are hard-pressed for liquidity.

If there is ever any debate about such issues, it takes in the few and far apart corners of social media platforms. The only time they are brought into the mainstream is when patriotic sentiments are needed to be expressed. Here again, the purpose of the discussion is not substantive debate on the impacts of opening up parts of the economy but whether or not non-nationals should be allowed to own parts of state enterprises such as Ethiopian Airlines.

As policies are devised, and legislations passed without substantive debate outside government offices, Abiy’s administration is getting a free reign in restructuring the economy.

Such political indifference toward the economy is not unprecedented. It is usually a topic left for the government to strain through and structure as it sees fit unless it has direct implications on hot-button topics. An example of this is the attention afforded to Addis Abeba’s recent initiatives to build houses in the inner city compared to middle- and low-housing projects located on the outskirts.

Such a culture stems from the view that Ethiopia’s woes are symptoms of its political dysfunction. And it is. But this ignores that this dysfunction is caused at least partially as much by economic disenfranchisement as it is with lack of representation, exclusion, injustice or the perceived loss of lingo-cultural identities. Growing unemployment, income inequality and lack of basic services and goods create a bleak political atmosphere that contributes to conflict and unrest, as does the absence of political rights.

By fueling social discontent, economic underperformance creates political dysfunction that, in turn, reduces investment, creating a vicious circle. This relationship between the economy and politics is not lost on the political players. They merely lack the responsibility and courage to bring up discussions that cannot be easily packaged to mobilise the masses.

It falls on the shoulders of the centrist voices to call attention to the state of the economy and the hazy direction it is being led toward. They ought to demand the political elites, especially those in the opposition, take positions on how the economy is being administered and draw up policies they believe can address unemployment, the rise in the cost of living and income inequality.

The more space that is provided to political debates in the national discourse at the expense of economic discussions, the likelier that political dysfunction will remain misunderstood and unaddressed.

Glass Actually All Empty

A feeling of doom and gloom casts a long shadow over Ethiopia. People are terrified. They are unnerved by what they see in the country. The threat of violence, disorder and chaos have us appreciating the relative stability we used to experience just a few years back.

Yet, we also find people who are incredibly cheery. Sure, they decry the rising cost of living, the political partisanship and the bad news that comes out almost every other week or month. But they do not seem to be as fazed by it. They claim they see the light at the end of the tunnel, the glass half full, the silver lining hidden in the clouds.

Why?

Because they are positive. They would rather focus on the positive than on the negative. This helps radiate positive energy, they claim, which could aid us greatly in our endeavours. If only every Ethiopian was endowed with a positive mindset, it would be possible to move forward as a nation, according to these people.

They also provide us with anecdotes. They know people who have tried it, they have tried it as well and it works. They were able to turn their lives around by merely developing a positive attitude. For them, correlation is causation. There was a time when they believe they started to become more optimistic and, in that period, their professional and social lives began to improve. Success, to them, must have been caused by their decision to look at the world through rainbow-coloured lenses.

If we showed these people the diagram of ice cream sales increasing in the summer season when there is also a rise in shark attacks, they would swear that ice cream draws sharks to humans.

It is rare to find people down the socioeconomic ladder who see life in the same way. These are people who are accused of being too pessimistic and negative about life.

How can the kids on the streets see life positively? Would we believe our own words when we tell them that if they dusted themselves up every time life threw them a curveball and worked hard, they could pick themselves up?

It is for this reason that the theory of meritocracy falls flat on its face. In a world where the few have had too much of a head start in the form of the wealth and institutional advantages they have inherited, people cannot be asked to compete on the same playing field.

It should not come as a surprise that it is these same people, who have had a running start, that want us to be positive. From their perspective, one has a choice whether or not to see the glass half full. They do not realise that from the perspective of the rest of us, the glass is actually all empty.

“I believe we ought to do all we can and seek to lift ourselves by our own bootstraps,” said Martin Luther King, the great civil rights activist said, “but it’s a cruel jest to say to a bootless man that he ought to lift himself by his own bootstraps.”

It is a powerful indictment against the argument that all a person needs to succeed is ambition, courage, commitment, integrity and optimism. Such a view is an insult to all those who were robbed of the education, networking and minimum starting capital for self-investment, and as a result failed to catch up.

Our personal, social and economic achievements are the sources of our success. To assume that it is the other way around is to endorse the regressive view that assigns blame to victims of history and institutions.