Viewpoints | Jun 18,2022
Dec 10 , 2022
By Diane Coyle ( Professor of Public Policy at the University of Cambridge, is the author, most recently, of Cogs and Monsters: What Economics Is, and What It Should be. )
The world's advanced economies are amid dual structural transformations that will change every aspect of our lives, from how we work and do business to how we regulate markets.
The most notable of these transformations is digitalization, which has been so ubiquitous over the past 25 years that referring to the "digital economy" today sounds as odd as talking about the "electricity economy." To be sure, the digital shift is not complete. Relatively few companies, for example, currently use cutting-edge artificial intelligence technologies. But billions worldwide already use AI-powered tools like chatbots and online translation.
The other transformation is the shift to a carbon-neutral economy, which will upend the energy, construction, transport, and manufacturing industries, as well as numerous other sectors. The fall in renewable prices, already faster than the declines in computer prices in previous decades, is a strong indicator that this transition is well underway. Decarbonization is set to accelerate with renewable power now significantly cheaper than fossil-fuel energy.
These technological shifts raise many policy questions, especially concerning antitrust enforcement.
For four decades, the prevailing view among economists has been that the roles of the private and public sectors could be clearly defined. According to this view, the state sets the legal framework, builds infrastructure, and funds basic research, while the private sector innovates and creates wealth. One core tenet of this approach, manifested in the privatization wave of the 1980s, was the assumption that the state should leave it to individual innovators, businesses, and consumers to decide what the future should look like.
But the world has changed since the 1980s.
The war in Ukraine and the threat of climate catastrophe have led Western governments to embrace industrial policies for the first time in decades. Even among mainstream economists, there is growing recognition that the state has a crucial role to play in ensuring the net-zero transition through policies that subsidize, among other things, chip fabrication and battery manufacturing.
Less attention has been paid to the competitive implications of this transition. A spate of reports published by regulatory agencies in recent years – such as the UK government report that I co-authored as part of an expert panel chaired by Jason Furman – have shown that existing antitrust-enforcement frameworks are ill-equipped to address the challenges posed by winner-takes-all digital markets. New laws regulating digital platforms, such as the European Union's Digital Markets Act, are a direct result of this reckoning, as is the anti-monopoly movement's resurgence in the United States.
The net-zero transition will underscore the radical competition-policy implications of the digital transformation, making it impossible for regulators to keep operating as they have in the past few decades.
Data sharing is a case in point. Competition policy typically opposes companies sharing information with each other – and for a good reason. But major disruptions will force antitrust-enforcement agencies to adapt. During the pandemic, for example, supermarkets sought to suspend competition laws to ensure that limited stocks of essential goods remained available.
Sharing data among firms is essential to reducing waste, increasing energy efficiency across supply chains, enabling autonomous-vehicle adoption and efficient transport management, and reducing entry barriers in digital markets. In the coming years, it will be up to competition authorities to decide which data companies may share, which data they must share, and how to monitor their compliance.
Regulators must also deepen their understanding of which technologies must be widely shared to enable competition and accelerate the shift to a carbon-neutral economy. Some past technological standards have slugged it out in the market – the battle between Betamax and VHS for home-video supremacy in the early 1980s comes to mind. In other cases, regulators have set standards, paving the way for rapid scaling and substantial cost reductions. The rapid spread of the GSM mobile standard during the 1990s, for example, made cell phones more affordable in low-income countries.
The latter model is more suitable for the net-zero transition. But first, regulators must move on from the Chicago School philosophy that has underpinned competition and supply-side policies around the world since the 1980s. The Chicago approach presumes an absence of radical structural change. Markets are presumed to be dynamic, but only up to a point. An analysis aiming to understand the impact of five to 10pc price increases in clearly defined markets is useless when the prices of some technologies plunge, and entirely new markets emerge. It is akin to relying on old maps of terrain since reshaped by earthquakes and volcanoes.
In short, policymakers must be careful when weighing the strategic benefits of technocratic competition and industrial policies. To enable the net-zero transition and foster a dynamic and inclusive digital economy, competition authorities must recognize the scale of the task they face and shake off outdated modes of thinking – the sooner, the better.
PUBLISHED ON Dec 10,2022 [ VOL 23 , NO 1180]
Viewpoints | Jun 18,2022
Radar | Jun 22,2019
Radar | Jul 13,2020
Editorial | Nov 12,2022
Viewpoints | Oct 09,2021
Editorial | Jun 27,2020
Viewpoints | Jul 24,2021
Fortune News | Sep 06,2020
Fortune News | Mar 07,2020
Fortune News | Aug 07,2021
Photo Gallery | 63966 Views | May 06,2019
Photo Gallery | 55846 Views | Apr 26,2019
Fortune News | 50926 Views | Jul 18,2020
Fortune News | 50508 Views | Sep 01,2021
Commentaries | Jan 21,2023
Life Matters | Jan 21,2023
My Opinion | Jan 21,2023
Sunday with Eden | Jan 21,2023
Agenda | Jan 21,2023
Editorial | Jan 21,2023
Dec 24 , 2022
Biniam Mikru heads the department of cabinet affairs under Mayor Adanech Abiebie. But...
Jul 2 , 2022 . By RUTH TAYE
On a rainy afternoon last week, a coffee processing facility in the capital's Akaki-Qality District was abuzz with activ...
Nov 27 , 2021
Against my will, I have witnessed the most terrible defeat of reason and the most sa...
Nov 13 , 2021
Plans and reality do not always gel. They rarely do in a fast-moving world. Every act...
Leaders of the National Election Board are in a charm offensive mood, of a sort. Last week, they organised a rare tour for members of the me...
When the country's most senior diplomats and envoys return back to their posts after two-week debriefings, they leave behind a point or two...
Jan 21 , 2023
Eyob Tekalign, state minister for Finance, took to social media platforms last week t...
Jan 14 , 2023
The longing for normalcy and a semblance of individual and collective security in Eth...
Jan 7 , 2023
The hallmark of Ethiopia's contemporary leaders could be a fascination with grandeur...
Dec 31 , 2022
A change of guards in 2018 gave Ethiopians hope for better circumstances from the pre...
I found myself in an awkward situation one of the days last week. The plan was to have lunch with two of my friends, but one of them was fas...
Jan 21 , 2023
Fewer couples tied the knot in 2022 than the year before; the post-pandemic environment could be attributed to over 12,000 more married coup...
A women's rehabilitation and skill development centre foresees construction as Mayor Adanech Abiebie laid...
Contractors are apprehensive about buying a policy from insurance companies as the requisite for collateral is half the performance bond. Af...
Jan 21 , 2023
Two federal offices of the highest stature saw newly appointed young leaders installed last week. Parliam...
Or see contact page